Longitudinal survey of UK anaesthetists progression in training: initial results.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lewis Hendon-John,Sophie Winter,Tom Gale,Gergo Pinter,Chris Carey
{"title":"Longitudinal survey of UK anaesthetists progression in training: initial results.","authors":"Lewis Hendon-John,Sophie Winter,Tom Gale,Gergo Pinter,Chris Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is a paucity of data relating to progression of trainees, and their wellbeing, during the 7-year UK anaesthesia training programme. We have established a longitudinal survey of the progression and wellbeing of the 2024 cohort of anaesthetists in training.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn July 2024, all UK doctors commencing anaesthesia training in August 2024 (n=548) were invited to complete an online questionnaire, gathering baseline quantitative data on demographics, wellbeing, career intentions and the application process, and qualitative data on concerns about training.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe response rate was 62% (n=338 participants). Mean participant age was 29 (range 24-46) yr, 50.3% were female and 97.6% were UK graduates. Physical (11.9%) and mental (5.8%) health conditions, specific learning difficulty (7.8%) and self-identification as neurodivergent (6.7%) were reported. Enjoying procedural skills and the quality of anaesthetic training were the most frequent motivations for choosing anaesthesia. Proximity to friends, family and partner, and current location, were the most frequently cited factors determining training post selection. Regarding career intentions, 76% intended to undertake part-time training and 38% planned to apply for dual training in intensive care medicine. Nearly two in three participants reported a negative imbalance between effort and reward of their work, and nearly one in three reported high levels of stress.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study offers insight into the characteristics and experiences of incoming anaesthetists in training. The information gained from longitudinal follow-up will facilitate the development of strategies to reduce stress, facilitate progression, and make optimal use of training capacity.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data relating to progression of trainees, and their wellbeing, during the 7-year UK anaesthesia training programme. We have established a longitudinal survey of the progression and wellbeing of the 2024 cohort of anaesthetists in training. METHODS In July 2024, all UK doctors commencing anaesthesia training in August 2024 (n=548) were invited to complete an online questionnaire, gathering baseline quantitative data on demographics, wellbeing, career intentions and the application process, and qualitative data on concerns about training. RESULTS The response rate was 62% (n=338 participants). Mean participant age was 29 (range 24-46) yr, 50.3% were female and 97.6% were UK graduates. Physical (11.9%) and mental (5.8%) health conditions, specific learning difficulty (7.8%) and self-identification as neurodivergent (6.7%) were reported. Enjoying procedural skills and the quality of anaesthetic training were the most frequent motivations for choosing anaesthesia. Proximity to friends, family and partner, and current location, were the most frequently cited factors determining training post selection. Regarding career intentions, 76% intended to undertake part-time training and 38% planned to apply for dual training in intensive care medicine. Nearly two in three participants reported a negative imbalance between effort and reward of their work, and nearly one in three reported high levels of stress. CONCLUSIONS This study offers insight into the characteristics and experiences of incoming anaesthetists in training. The information gained from longitudinal follow-up will facilitate the development of strategies to reduce stress, facilitate progression, and make optimal use of training capacity.
英国麻醉师培训进展的纵向调查:初步结果。
背景:在为期7年的英国麻醉培训计划中,缺乏与受训人员的发展和他们的健康有关的数据。我们已经建立了一个纵向调查的进展和福祉的2024年队列麻醉师在培训。方法于2024年7月,邀请所有于2024年8月开始接受麻醉培训的英国医生(n=548)完成一份在线问卷,收集人口统计学、幸福感、职业意向和申请流程的基线定量数据,以及培训关注点的定性数据。结果有效率为62% (n=338)。参与者平均年龄为29岁(24-46岁),50.3%为女性,97.6%为英国毕业生。报告了身体(11.9%)和精神(5.8%)健康状况、特定学习困难(7.8%)和自我认同为神经发散性(6.7%)。享受手术技巧和麻醉训练的质量是选择麻醉的最常见动机。与朋友、家人和伴侣的距离以及当前位置是决定培训岗位选择的最常见因素。在职业意向方面,76%的人打算参加兼职培训,38%的人计划申请重症监护医学的双重培训。近三分之二的参与者表示,他们的努力和工作回报之间存在负平衡,近三分之一的人表示压力很大。结论本研究揭示了麻醉师入职培训的特点和经验。从纵向随访中获得的信息将有助于制定减轻压力、促进进步和最佳利用培训能力的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书