Lewis Hendon-John,Sophie Winter,Tom Gale,Gergo Pinter,Chris Carey
{"title":"Longitudinal survey of UK anaesthetists progression in training: initial results.","authors":"Lewis Hendon-John,Sophie Winter,Tom Gale,Gergo Pinter,Chris Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is a paucity of data relating to progression of trainees, and their wellbeing, during the 7-year UK anaesthesia training programme. We have established a longitudinal survey of the progression and wellbeing of the 2024 cohort of anaesthetists in training.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn July 2024, all UK doctors commencing anaesthesia training in August 2024 (n=548) were invited to complete an online questionnaire, gathering baseline quantitative data on demographics, wellbeing, career intentions and the application process, and qualitative data on concerns about training.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe response rate was 62% (n=338 participants). Mean participant age was 29 (range 24-46) yr, 50.3% were female and 97.6% were UK graduates. Physical (11.9%) and mental (5.8%) health conditions, specific learning difficulty (7.8%) and self-identification as neurodivergent (6.7%) were reported. Enjoying procedural skills and the quality of anaesthetic training were the most frequent motivations for choosing anaesthesia. Proximity to friends, family and partner, and current location, were the most frequently cited factors determining training post selection. Regarding career intentions, 76% intended to undertake part-time training and 38% planned to apply for dual training in intensive care medicine. Nearly two in three participants reported a negative imbalance between effort and reward of their work, and nearly one in three reported high levels of stress.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study offers insight into the characteristics and experiences of incoming anaesthetists in training. The information gained from longitudinal follow-up will facilitate the development of strategies to reduce stress, facilitate progression, and make optimal use of training capacity.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of data relating to progression of trainees, and their wellbeing, during the 7-year UK anaesthesia training programme. We have established a longitudinal survey of the progression and wellbeing of the 2024 cohort of anaesthetists in training.
METHODS
In July 2024, all UK doctors commencing anaesthesia training in August 2024 (n=548) were invited to complete an online questionnaire, gathering baseline quantitative data on demographics, wellbeing, career intentions and the application process, and qualitative data on concerns about training.
RESULTS
The response rate was 62% (n=338 participants). Mean participant age was 29 (range 24-46) yr, 50.3% were female and 97.6% were UK graduates. Physical (11.9%) and mental (5.8%) health conditions, specific learning difficulty (7.8%) and self-identification as neurodivergent (6.7%) were reported. Enjoying procedural skills and the quality of anaesthetic training were the most frequent motivations for choosing anaesthesia. Proximity to friends, family and partner, and current location, were the most frequently cited factors determining training post selection. Regarding career intentions, 76% intended to undertake part-time training and 38% planned to apply for dual training in intensive care medicine. Nearly two in three participants reported a negative imbalance between effort and reward of their work, and nearly one in three reported high levels of stress.
CONCLUSIONS
This study offers insight into the characteristics and experiences of incoming anaesthetists in training. The information gained from longitudinal follow-up will facilitate the development of strategies to reduce stress, facilitate progression, and make optimal use of training capacity.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.