[Therapeutic impoverishment in modern anesthesiology-Between safety culture, regulations and loss of clinical diversity : A critical analysis].

IF 1
Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s00101-026-01680-4
Daniel Chappell, Peter Kranke
{"title":"[Therapeutic impoverishment in modern anesthesiology-Between safety culture, regulations and loss of clinical diversity : A critical analysis].","authors":"Daniel Chappell, Peter Kranke","doi":"10.1007/s00101-026-01680-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, anesthesiology has been a discipline with a broad pharmacological spectrum. In recent years, however, there has been a clear trend toward reducing this range of therapeutic options. Numerous well-established agents have lost importance in many hospitals or have disappeared entirely from the routine clinical practice. This decline is only partly based on new evidence, more often, didactic simplification, cultural standardization, ecological discussions and regulatory interventions by authorities play a decisive role. This article analyzes the causes and mechanisms of this therapeutic impoverishment and compares these developments with other medical disciplines. Finally, it outlines ways in which indication-based, evidence-oriented and differentiated pharmacotherapy in anesthesiology can be strengthened once again.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"351-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-026-01680-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, anesthesiology has been a discipline with a broad pharmacological spectrum. In recent years, however, there has been a clear trend toward reducing this range of therapeutic options. Numerous well-established agents have lost importance in many hospitals or have disappeared entirely from the routine clinical practice. This decline is only partly based on new evidence, more often, didactic simplification, cultural standardization, ecological discussions and regulatory interventions by authorities play a decisive role. This article analyzes the causes and mechanisms of this therapeutic impoverishment and compares these developments with other medical disciplines. Finally, it outlines ways in which indication-based, evidence-oriented and differentiated pharmacotherapy in anesthesiology can be strengthened once again.

现代麻醉学的治疗贫乏——在安全文化、规章制度和临床多样性的丧失之间:一项批判性分析。
传统上,麻醉学一直是一门具有广泛药理学谱的学科。然而,近年来,有一种明显的趋势是减少这种治疗选择的范围。许多公认的药物在许多医院已经失去了重要性,或者完全从常规临床实践中消失了。这种下降只是部分基于新的证据,更常见的是,教学简化、文化标准化、生态讨论和当局的监管干预发挥了决定性作用。本文分析了这种治疗贫困的原因和机制,并将其与其他医学学科的发展进行了比较。最后,它概述了以适应证为基础,以证据为导向和差异化的麻醉药物治疗可以再次加强的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书