Lessons Learned in the Early Adoption of Method of Detection Reporting.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Michelle V Lee, Sarah M Pittman, Eric Rosen, Luther W Meyer, Peter Eby, Sujata V Ghate, Lars J Grimm
{"title":"Lessons Learned in the Early Adoption of Method of Detection Reporting.","authors":"Michelle V Lee, Sarah M Pittman, Eric Rosen, Luther W Meyer, Peter Eby, Sujata V Ghate, Lars J Grimm","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbag001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until recently, no breast cancer database in the United States records how breast cancers are initially detected, and, therefore, current data lack the fundamental ability to link breast cancer outcomes to screening directly. Consequently, the magnitude and relative contributions that screening and treatment play in the reduction of breast cancer mortality are unknown, and the debate over breast cancer screening continues. To address these shortcomings, advocates have proposed that the Method of Detection (MOD) be documented with every breast cancer diagnosis. MOD data can then be abstracted to cancer registries to provide direct evidence of the impact of screening on breast cancer diagnoses and subsequent outcomes and thereby resolve the debate about the benefits of screening. Given the widespread support of MOD reporting, there is also great potential to improve and facilitate its clinical implementation. Barriers to MOD adoption include a lack of an organized national breast cancer screening program, the cost of implementation, a lack of radiologist MOD training, and technical lapses, among others. The American College of Radiology and the Society of Breast Imaging have addressed barriers to MOD implementation through educational opportunities and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 6th Edition provides comprehensive education on the MOD program. However, consistent and accurate MOD reporting and linkage to tumor registries on a national level will require a multifaceted approach to achieve success. Ultimately, the information gained from the direct role of MOD will result in breast cancer screening recommendations built on science-based policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbag001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until recently, no breast cancer database in the United States records how breast cancers are initially detected, and, therefore, current data lack the fundamental ability to link breast cancer outcomes to screening directly. Consequently, the magnitude and relative contributions that screening and treatment play in the reduction of breast cancer mortality are unknown, and the debate over breast cancer screening continues. To address these shortcomings, advocates have proposed that the Method of Detection (MOD) be documented with every breast cancer diagnosis. MOD data can then be abstracted to cancer registries to provide direct evidence of the impact of screening on breast cancer diagnoses and subsequent outcomes and thereby resolve the debate about the benefits of screening. Given the widespread support of MOD reporting, there is also great potential to improve and facilitate its clinical implementation. Barriers to MOD adoption include a lack of an organized national breast cancer screening program, the cost of implementation, a lack of radiologist MOD training, and technical lapses, among others. The American College of Radiology and the Society of Breast Imaging have addressed barriers to MOD implementation through educational opportunities and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 6th Edition provides comprehensive education on the MOD program. However, consistent and accurate MOD reporting and linkage to tumor registries on a national level will require a multifaceted approach to achieve success. Ultimately, the information gained from the direct role of MOD will result in breast cancer screening recommendations built on science-based policy.

早期采用检测报告方法的经验教训。
直到最近,美国还没有乳腺癌数据库记录乳腺癌最初是如何被发现的,因此,目前的数据缺乏将乳腺癌结果与筛查直接联系起来的基本能力。因此,筛查和治疗在降低乳腺癌死亡率方面的作用的大小和相对贡献是未知的,关于乳腺癌筛查的争论仍在继续。为了解决这些缺点,倡导者建议在每次乳腺癌诊断时记录检测方法(MOD)。然后可以将MOD数据提取到癌症登记处,为筛查对乳腺癌诊断和后续结果的影响提供直接证据,从而解决关于筛查益处的争论。鉴于MOD报告的广泛支持,改进和促进其临床实施的潜力也很大。采用MOD的障碍包括缺乏有组织的国家乳腺癌筛查计划、实施成本、缺乏放射科医生MOD培训以及技术失误等。美国放射学院和乳腺成像学会通过教育机会解决了MOD实施的障碍,乳腺成像报告和数据系统第6版提供了关于MOD计划的全面教育。然而,在国家层面上,一致和准确的MOD报告以及与肿瘤登记的联系将需要采取多方面的方法才能取得成功。最终,从MOD的直接作用中获得的信息将导致建立在科学政策基础上的乳腺癌筛查建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书