Behavioral Domain-Specific Effects of Positive Modulation of α5 and α6 GABAA Receptors in a Rat Double-Hit Stress Model.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Đorđe Đorović, Jovana Aranđelović, Jana Ivanović, Kristina Jezdić, Bojan Batinić, Dishary Sharmin, Prithu Mondal, James M Cook, Miroslav M Savić
{"title":"Behavioral Domain-Specific Effects of Positive Modulation of α5 and α6 GABA<sub>A</sub> Receptors in a Rat Double-Hit Stress Model.","authors":"Đorđe Đorović, Jovana Aranđelović, Jana Ivanović, Kristina Jezdić, Bojan Batinić, Dishary Sharmin, Prithu Mondal, James M Cook, Miroslav M Savić","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impulsivity is an understudied area of post-traumatic stress disorder, a debilitating disorder specifically associated with stress. We examined reward-related impulsive behavior, anxiety-like behavior, locomotor activity and social behavior in the absence and presence of protracted pharmacological positive modulation of α5- and α6-GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors (GL-II-73 and DK-I-56-1, respectively) in male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to a combination of maternal deprivation (MD) and single prolonged stress (SPS). While locomotor and anxiety-like behavior were not affected in the SPS and MD+SPS groups, the double-hit group treated with DK-I-56-1 exhibited a higher locomotor distance compared with MD+SPS and a higher percentage of open-arm time in the elevated plus maze compared with the control group. In the variable delay-to-signal task of impulsivity, the total number of successful trials and premature responses (PR) in the first stage of the test day were reduced in all groups exposed to stress compared with the controls. Based on PR rates in the first and second set of trials, motor impulsivity was apparently suppressed in all stressed groups, while delay intolerance was suppressed only in the MD+SPS+GL-II-73 group, respectively. In the three-chamber test, social interaction was completely normal, while social recognition was preserved in the MD+SPS+GL-II-73 group. In the resident-intruder test, social play was reduced only in the SPS group. The evaluation of impulsive behavior in the used complex task was hindered by the lack of motivation of stressed rats, which in the case of omission percentage was ameliorated by positive modulation of α5 and α6 GABA<sub>A</sub> receptors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"14 3","pages":"e70245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13088882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impulsivity is an understudied area of post-traumatic stress disorder, a debilitating disorder specifically associated with stress. We examined reward-related impulsive behavior, anxiety-like behavior, locomotor activity and social behavior in the absence and presence of protracted pharmacological positive modulation of α5- and α6-GABAA receptors (GL-II-73 and DK-I-56-1, respectively) in male Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to a combination of maternal deprivation (MD) and single prolonged stress (SPS). While locomotor and anxiety-like behavior were not affected in the SPS and MD+SPS groups, the double-hit group treated with DK-I-56-1 exhibited a higher locomotor distance compared with MD+SPS and a higher percentage of open-arm time in the elevated plus maze compared with the control group. In the variable delay-to-signal task of impulsivity, the total number of successful trials and premature responses (PR) in the first stage of the test day were reduced in all groups exposed to stress compared with the controls. Based on PR rates in the first and second set of trials, motor impulsivity was apparently suppressed in all stressed groups, while delay intolerance was suppressed only in the MD+SPS+GL-II-73 group, respectively. In the three-chamber test, social interaction was completely normal, while social recognition was preserved in the MD+SPS+GL-II-73 group. In the resident-intruder test, social play was reduced only in the SPS group. The evaluation of impulsive behavior in the used complex task was hindered by the lack of motivation of stressed rats, which in the case of omission percentage was ameliorated by positive modulation of α5 and α6 GABAA receptors.

大鼠双击应激模型中α5和α6 GABAA受体正调节的行为域特异性作用
冲动是创伤后应激障碍的一个研究不足的领域,这是一种与压力特别相关的衰弱性障碍。我们研究了暴露于母性剥夺(MD)和单一长时间应激(SPS)的雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠,在α5-和α6-GABAA受体(分别为GL-II-73和DK-I-56-1)长期药物阳性调节缺失和存在的情况下,与奖励相关的冲动行为、焦虑样行为、运动活动和社交行为。虽然在SPS和MD+SPS组中,运动和焦虑样行为没有受到影响,但与MD+SPS相比,DK-I-56-1治疗的双击组表现出更高的运动距离,并且与对照组相比,在高架加迷宫中张开手臂的时间百分比更高。在冲动性的可变延迟-信号任务中,应激组在测试日第一阶段的成功试验总数和过早反应(PR)均比对照组减少。根据第一组和第二组试验的PR率,所有应激组的运动冲动性明显受到抑制,而延迟不耐受分别仅在MD+SPS+GL-II-73组受到抑制。在三室测试中,社会互动完全正常,而社会认知在MD+SPS+GL-II-73组保持不变。在居住者-入侵者测试中,只有SPS组的社交活动减少。应激大鼠在复杂任务中冲动行为的评价受到动机缺乏的阻碍,而在遗漏率情况下,α5和α6 GABAA受体的正调节可改善其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书