Push Notifications Can Be Used for Safe and Timely Communication of Critical Lab Results in the Emergency Department

IF 3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dhara P. Amin MD (is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.), Matthew Bonomo MD (is Emergency Medicine Administration Fellow, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.), Lorena Chesebro MBA (is Director of Laboratory Quality, Compliance and Safety, University of Chicago Medical Center.), Charlotte Farley MD (is Resident Physician, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.), Melissa S. Pessin MD, PhD (is Medical Director, Hyde Park Clinical Laboratories and Alternative Site Testing, and Professor, Department of Pathology, University of Chicago. Please address correspondence to Dhara P. Amin)
{"title":"Push Notifications Can Be Used for Safe and Timely Communication of Critical Lab Results in the Emergency Department","authors":"Dhara P. Amin MD (is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.),&nbsp;Matthew Bonomo MD (is Emergency Medicine Administration Fellow, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.),&nbsp;Lorena Chesebro MBA (is Director of Laboratory Quality, Compliance and Safety, University of Chicago Medical Center.),&nbsp;Charlotte Farley MD (is Resident Physician, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago.),&nbsp;Melissa S. Pessin MD, PhD (is Medical Director, Hyde Park Clinical Laboratories and Alternative Site Testing, and Professor, Department of Pathology, University of Chicago. Please address correspondence to Dhara P. Amin)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2026.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prompt notification of critical results is important for both patient safety and laboratory and hospital accreditation. Although many institutions still rely on manual pages and phone calls to notify care teams of critical results, automation could improve the efficacy of this process. Some electronic health records offer the ability to configure automatic push notifications to a provider’s secure text pager or clinical application that allows for a closed-loop result acknowledgment. It is not known if push notifications for critical results can successfully reach providers, improve acknowledgment times, or allow for sufficiently high acknowledgment rates to meet accreditation standards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors conducted a continuous quality improvement initiative to develop a pathway that uses initial push notifications for critical results for patients in the emergency department (ED).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A prior pathway of using solely phone calls for critical result notifications had a mean acknowledgment time of 2.93 minutes, and 97.5% of results were acknowledged within 30 minutes. The new pathway that used an initial push notification had a longer mean acknowledgment time (8.20 minutes), and fewer results acknowledged within 30 minutes (93.3%). Though the new pathway was slower than only using phone calls, it maintained an acknowledgment rate greater than 90%, in line with some accreditation standards. It also saved the medical laboratory scientist previously making these calls roughly 8.5 hours of phone calls over the five-month study period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There are additional opportunities to iterate on this process. For the ED setting, push notifications represent a promising innovation for critical result notifications, but the best way to deploy them remains unknown and is likely clinical context dependent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"52 5","pages":"Pages 225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725026000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prompt notification of critical results is important for both patient safety and laboratory and hospital accreditation. Although many institutions still rely on manual pages and phone calls to notify care teams of critical results, automation could improve the efficacy of this process. Some electronic health records offer the ability to configure automatic push notifications to a provider’s secure text pager or clinical application that allows for a closed-loop result acknowledgment. It is not known if push notifications for critical results can successfully reach providers, improve acknowledgment times, or allow for sufficiently high acknowledgment rates to meet accreditation standards.

Methods

The authors conducted a continuous quality improvement initiative to develop a pathway that uses initial push notifications for critical results for patients in the emergency department (ED).

Results

A prior pathway of using solely phone calls for critical result notifications had a mean acknowledgment time of 2.93 minutes, and 97.5% of results were acknowledged within 30 minutes. The new pathway that used an initial push notification had a longer mean acknowledgment time (8.20 minutes), and fewer results acknowledged within 30 minutes (93.3%). Though the new pathway was slower than only using phone calls, it maintained an acknowledgment rate greater than 90%, in line with some accreditation standards. It also saved the medical laboratory scientist previously making these calls roughly 8.5 hours of phone calls over the five-month study period.

Conclusion

There are additional opportunities to iterate on this process. For the ED setting, push notifications represent a promising innovation for critical result notifications, but the best way to deploy them remains unknown and is likely clinical context dependent.
推送通知可用于急诊科安全及时地沟通关键实验室结果。
背景:及时通知关键结果对患者安全以及实验室和医院认证都很重要。尽管许多机构仍然依靠手册页和电话来通知护理团队关键结果,但自动化可以提高这一过程的效率。一些电子健康记录提供了配置自动推送通知到提供者的安全文本寻呼机或临床应用程序的功能,从而允许闭环结果确认。目前尚不清楚关键结果的推送通知是否能够成功送达提供商、改善确认时间或允许足够高的确认率以满足认证标准。方法:作者开展了一项持续的质量改进倡议,以开发一种途径,对急诊科(ED)患者的关键结果使用初始推送通知。结果:先前仅使用电话进行关键结果通知的途径平均确认时间为2.93分钟,97.5%的结果在30分钟内得到确认。使用初始推送通知的新路径平均确认时间更长(8.20分钟),30分钟内确认的结果较少(93.3%)。虽然新途径比只使用电话要慢,但它保持了超过90%的确认率,符合一些认证标准。在五个月的研究期间,这也为医学实验室的科学家节省了大约8.5个小时的打电话时间。结论:在这个过程中有更多的迭代机会。对于急诊科来说,推送通知代表了关键结果通知的一种有前途的创新,但部署它们的最佳方式仍然未知,并且可能取决于临床环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书