Jessica Persson Kylén, Dawn Stacey, Inger Wårdh, Krystina B Lewis
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making Theories, Conceptual Models, and Frameworks Within Oral Healthcare: A Theory Analysis.","authors":"Jessica Persson Kylén, Dawn Stacey, Inger Wårdh, Krystina B Lewis","doi":"10.1111/idh.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To appraise the quality of theories, conceptual models, and theoretical frameworks about SDM for oral healthcare practices.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial to person-centred care. Yet little is known about how (and if) patient engagement in SDM is conceptualised in oral healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a theory analysis of theories, conceptual models, and frameworks. We searched Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible theories/conceptual models/frameworks had to specifically focus on SDM in oral healthcare. Eligible papers were analysed using Walker and Avant's theory analysis steps and mapped onto the 8 core elements of SDM.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>Of 195 citations, two conceptual models specific to oral healthcare were identified. The SDM System on Dental Restorations (SDMS-DR; South Korea) focuses on decisions between dentists and patients about restorative treatment. The Four + one Habits Model for dental visits (4 + 1 HB; Norway) is an approach for SDM across oral healthcare decisions, more broadly. Both conceptual models focus on the patient-professional encounter and met 4 (SDMS-DR) and 6 (4 + 1HB) of the 8 core elements of SDM. The SDMS-DR provided no reference to the patients' expertise. The 4 + 1HB presented SDM as a standardised linear process rather than a dynamic process. Neither has been empirically tested, and they do not acknowledge the broader healthcare system within which the encounters take place.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified two conceptual models that incorporated some elements of SDM for oral healthcare. Neither was evaluated, and both focus exclusively on the patient-oral healthcare professional encounter, without consideration of intersectional, multidisciplinary healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"797-807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13622928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To appraise the quality of theories, conceptual models, and theoretical frameworks about SDM for oral healthcare practices.
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial to person-centred care. Yet little is known about how (and if) patient engagement in SDM is conceptualised in oral healthcare.
Methods: We conducted a theory analysis of theories, conceptual models, and frameworks. We searched Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible theories/conceptual models/frameworks had to specifically focus on SDM in oral healthcare. Eligible papers were analysed using Walker and Avant's theory analysis steps and mapped onto the 8 core elements of SDM.
Main findings: Of 195 citations, two conceptual models specific to oral healthcare were identified. The SDM System on Dental Restorations (SDMS-DR; South Korea) focuses on decisions between dentists and patients about restorative treatment. The Four + one Habits Model for dental visits (4 + 1 HB; Norway) is an approach for SDM across oral healthcare decisions, more broadly. Both conceptual models focus on the patient-professional encounter and met 4 (SDMS-DR) and 6 (4 + 1HB) of the 8 core elements of SDM. The SDMS-DR provided no reference to the patients' expertise. The 4 + 1HB presented SDM as a standardised linear process rather than a dynamic process. Neither has been empirically tested, and they do not acknowledge the broader healthcare system within which the encounters take place.
Conclusion: We identified two conceptual models that incorporated some elements of SDM for oral healthcare. Neither was evaluated, and both focus exclusively on the patient-oral healthcare professional encounter, without consideration of intersectional, multidisciplinary healthcare services.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities.
The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.