Shared Decision-Making Theories, Conceptual Models, and Frameworks Within Oral Healthcare: A Theory Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International journal of dental hygiene Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-16 DOI:10.1111/idh.70074
Jessica Persson Kylén, Dawn Stacey, Inger Wårdh, Krystina B Lewis
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making Theories, Conceptual Models, and Frameworks Within Oral Healthcare: A Theory Analysis.","authors":"Jessica Persson Kylén, Dawn Stacey, Inger Wårdh, Krystina B Lewis","doi":"10.1111/idh.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To appraise the quality of theories, conceptual models, and theoretical frameworks about SDM for oral healthcare practices.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial to person-centred care. Yet little is known about how (and if) patient engagement in SDM is conceptualised in oral healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a theory analysis of theories, conceptual models, and frameworks. We searched Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible theories/conceptual models/frameworks had to specifically focus on SDM in oral healthcare. Eligible papers were analysed using Walker and Avant's theory analysis steps and mapped onto the 8 core elements of SDM.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>Of 195 citations, two conceptual models specific to oral healthcare were identified. The SDM System on Dental Restorations (SDMS-DR; South Korea) focuses on decisions between dentists and patients about restorative treatment. The Four + one Habits Model for dental visits (4 + 1 HB; Norway) is an approach for SDM across oral healthcare decisions, more broadly. Both conceptual models focus on the patient-professional encounter and met 4 (SDMS-DR) and 6 (4 + 1HB) of the 8 core elements of SDM. The SDMS-DR provided no reference to the patients' expertise. The 4 + 1HB presented SDM as a standardised linear process rather than a dynamic process. Neither has been empirically tested, and they do not acknowledge the broader healthcare system within which the encounters take place.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified two conceptual models that incorporated some elements of SDM for oral healthcare. Neither was evaluated, and both focus exclusively on the patient-oral healthcare professional encounter, without consideration of intersectional, multidisciplinary healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"797-807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13622928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To appraise the quality of theories, conceptual models, and theoretical frameworks about SDM for oral healthcare practices.

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial to person-centred care. Yet little is known about how (and if) patient engagement in SDM is conceptualised in oral healthcare.

Methods: We conducted a theory analysis of theories, conceptual models, and frameworks. We searched Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible theories/conceptual models/frameworks had to specifically focus on SDM in oral healthcare. Eligible papers were analysed using Walker and Avant's theory analysis steps and mapped onto the 8 core elements of SDM.

Main findings: Of 195 citations, two conceptual models specific to oral healthcare were identified. The SDM System on Dental Restorations (SDMS-DR; South Korea) focuses on decisions between dentists and patients about restorative treatment. The Four + one Habits Model for dental visits (4 + 1 HB; Norway) is an approach for SDM across oral healthcare decisions, more broadly. Both conceptual models focus on the patient-professional encounter and met 4 (SDMS-DR) and 6 (4 + 1HB) of the 8 core elements of SDM. The SDMS-DR provided no reference to the patients' expertise. The 4 + 1HB presented SDM as a standardised linear process rather than a dynamic process. Neither has been empirically tested, and they do not acknowledge the broader healthcare system within which the encounters take place.

Conclusion: We identified two conceptual models that incorporated some elements of SDM for oral healthcare. Neither was evaluated, and both focus exclusively on the patient-oral healthcare professional encounter, without consideration of intersectional, multidisciplinary healthcare services.

口腔保健中的共享决策理论、概念模型和框架:一个理论分析。
目的:评价口腔保健实践中SDM的理论、概念模型和理论框架的质量。背景:共同决策(SDM)对以人为本的护理至关重要。然而,对于如何(以及是否)将患者参与SDM概念化在口腔保健中知之甚少。方法:对理论、概念模型和框架进行理论分析。我们检索了Medline, Scopus和CINAHL。合格的理论/概念模型/框架必须特别关注口腔保健中的SDM。采用Walker和Avant的理论分析步骤对符合条件的论文进行分析,并将其映射到SDM的8个核心要素上。主要发现:在195个引用中,确定了两个特定于口腔保健的概念模型。牙科修复体SDM系统(SDMS-DR;韩国)侧重于牙医和患者之间关于修复治疗的决策。牙科就诊的4 + 1习惯模型(4 + 1 HB;挪威)是一种更广泛地用于口腔卫生保健决策的SDM方法。这两个概念模型都关注患者与专业人员的接触,并满足SDM 8个核心要素中的4 (SDMS-DR)和6 (4 + 1HB)。SDMS-DR没有提供患者专业知识的参考。4 + 1HB将SDM呈现为一个标准化的线性过程,而不是一个动态过程。两者都没有经过经验检验,而且他们不承认发生这种情况的更广泛的医疗体系。结论:我们确定了两个概念模型,这些模型结合了口腔保健中SDM的一些元素。两者都没有被评估,并且都只关注患者-口腔保健专业人员的接触,而没有考虑交叉的,多学科的保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of dental hygiene
International journal of dental hygiene DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities. The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书