Patterns and Drivers of Packaged (Fortified) Maize Flour Purchase in Urban and Peri-Urban Kenya.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Semeni Ngozi, Ayala Wineman, Mywish K Maredia, David Tschirley, Ian Fisher, Nahian Bin Khaled
{"title":"Patterns and Drivers of Packaged (Fortified) Maize Flour Purchase in Urban and Peri-Urban Kenya.","authors":"Semeni Ngozi, Ayala Wineman, Mywish K Maredia, David Tschirley, Ian Fisher, Nahian Bin Khaled","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large-scale food fortification is a widely applied strategy to address micronutrient deficiencies, and in Kenya, all industrially processed and packaged maize flour is mandated to be fortified with micronutrients. However, policymakers lack information regarding the population's readiness to procure fortified foods. This study aims to measure the purchase rate of packaged (and presumably fortified) maize flour among households in two Kenyan cities and assess how food environment, household characteristics, and individual shopper perceptions influence consumption of this product.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey of 1,507 households in urban and peri-urban Kisumu and Nairobi from May to June 2022 to gather information on food purchases, food-shopping behavior, awareness of fortification, and household demographics and socioeconomic status. Between June and August 2022, we conducted a census of food outlets to characterize the households' home food environment. To analyze the data, we first conducted a descriptive analysis with statistics disaggregated by study-region, household poverty status, and/or status as a consumer of packaged maize flour. We then used a probit regression to determine the differential influence of various factors on the households' likelihood of purchasing packaged (presumably fortified) maize flour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across Kisumu and Nairobi, 67% of households purchased packaged maize flour, with higher rates seen in urban and peri-urban Nairobi (68% and 70%, respectively) and lower rates seen in urban and peri-urban Kisumu (50% and 34%, respectively). While almost 100% of households had some access to packaged maize flour in their home food environment, the density of outlets that sell this product varied from 12/km<sup>2</sup> in peri-urban Kisumu to 54/km<sup>2</sup> in urban Nairobi. Moreover, households that purchased packaged maize flour resided in neighborhoods with approximately 11 more outlets/km<sup>2</sup>, on average, than other households. The local price premium charged for packaged maize flour compared to unpackaged maize flour was a negative and statistically significant driver of the purchase decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If the goal is to enhance the population's uptake of fortified maize meal, the government should encourage the private sector to invest more in food outlets that sell packaged maize flour; reduce the retail cost of packaged maize flour; raise awareness of the benefits of fortification (particularly in peri-urban Kisumu); and make relevant technologies available at the scale of smaller mills.</p>","PeriodicalId":12692,"journal":{"name":"Global Health: Science and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large-scale food fortification is a widely applied strategy to address micronutrient deficiencies, and in Kenya, all industrially processed and packaged maize flour is mandated to be fortified with micronutrients. However, policymakers lack information regarding the population's readiness to procure fortified foods. This study aims to measure the purchase rate of packaged (and presumably fortified) maize flour among households in two Kenyan cities and assess how food environment, household characteristics, and individual shopper perceptions influence consumption of this product.

Methods: We conducted a survey of 1,507 households in urban and peri-urban Kisumu and Nairobi from May to June 2022 to gather information on food purchases, food-shopping behavior, awareness of fortification, and household demographics and socioeconomic status. Between June and August 2022, we conducted a census of food outlets to characterize the households' home food environment. To analyze the data, we first conducted a descriptive analysis with statistics disaggregated by study-region, household poverty status, and/or status as a consumer of packaged maize flour. We then used a probit regression to determine the differential influence of various factors on the households' likelihood of purchasing packaged (presumably fortified) maize flour.

Results: Across Kisumu and Nairobi, 67% of households purchased packaged maize flour, with higher rates seen in urban and peri-urban Nairobi (68% and 70%, respectively) and lower rates seen in urban and peri-urban Kisumu (50% and 34%, respectively). While almost 100% of households had some access to packaged maize flour in their home food environment, the density of outlets that sell this product varied from 12/km2 in peri-urban Kisumu to 54/km2 in urban Nairobi. Moreover, households that purchased packaged maize flour resided in neighborhoods with approximately 11 more outlets/km2, on average, than other households. The local price premium charged for packaged maize flour compared to unpackaged maize flour was a negative and statistically significant driver of the purchase decision.

Conclusions: If the goal is to enhance the population's uptake of fortified maize meal, the government should encourage the private sector to invest more in food outlets that sell packaged maize flour; reduce the retail cost of packaged maize flour; raise awareness of the benefits of fortification (particularly in peri-urban Kisumu); and make relevant technologies available at the scale of smaller mills.

肯尼亚城市和城郊地区包装(强化)玉米粉购买模式和驱动因素。
背景:大规模食品强化是解决微量营养素缺乏症的一种广泛应用的策略,在肯尼亚,所有工业加工和包装的玉米粉都必须添加微量营养素。然而,决策者缺乏关于人们是否愿意购买强化食品的信息。本研究旨在衡量肯尼亚两个城市家庭中包装玉米粉(可能是强化玉米粉)的购买率,并评估食品环境、家庭特征和个人购物者观念如何影响该产品的消费。方法:我们于2022年5月至6月在基苏木和内罗毕的城市和城郊对1,507户家庭进行了调查,收集食品购买、食品购物行为、强化意识、家庭人口统计和社会经济状况等信息。在2022年6月至8月期间,我们对食品网点进行了普查,以表征家庭的家庭食品环境。为了分析数据,我们首先进行了描述性分析,根据研究地区、家庭贫困状况和/或作为包装玉米粉消费者的身份进行了统计分类。然后,我们使用概率回归来确定各种因素对家庭购买包装(可能是强化)玉米粉的可能性的差异影响。结果:在基苏木和内罗毕,67%的家庭购买了包装好的玉米粉,内罗毕城市和城郊的比例较高(分别为68%和70%),而基苏木城市和城郊的比例较低(分别为50%和34%)。虽然几乎100%的家庭都能在家庭食品环境中获得包装玉米粉,但销售该产品的网点密度从基苏木城郊的12个/平方公里到内罗毕城郊的54个/平方公里不等。此外,购买包装玉米粉的家庭居住的社区平均每平方公里的销售点比其他家庭多约11个。与未包装玉米粉相比,包装玉米粉在当地收取的价格溢价是一个负的、统计上显著的购买决定驱动因素。结论:如果目标是提高人口对强化玉米粉的吸收,政府应鼓励私营部门加大对销售包装玉米粉的食品店的投资;降低包装玉米粉的零售成本;提高对防御工事效益的认识(特别是在基苏木城郊);并在较小的工厂规模上提供相关技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health: Science and Practice
Global Health: Science and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
178
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP) is a no-fee, open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal aimed to improve health practice, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Our goal is to reach those who design, implement, manage, evaluate, and otherwise support health programs. We are especially interested in advancing knowledge on practical program implementation issues, with information on what programs entail and how they are implemented. GHSP is currently indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, POPLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS,. the Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index, and the USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC). TOPICS: Issued four times a year, GHSP will include articles on all global health topics, covering diverse programming models and a wide range of cross-cutting issues that impact and support health systems. Examples include but are not limited to: Health: Addiction and harm reduction, Child Health, Communicable and Emerging Diseases, Disaster Preparedness and Response, Environmental Health, Family Planning/Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternal Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases, Non-Communicable Diseases/Injuries, Nutrition, Tuberculosis, Water and Sanitation. Cross-Cutting Issues: Epidemiology, Gender, Health Communication/Healthy Behavior, Health Policy and Advocacy, Health Systems, Human Resources/Training, Knowledge Management, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Management and Governance, mHealth/eHealth/digital health, Monitoring and Evaluation, Scale Up, Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书