Elfi M Verheul, Frank Doornkamp, Iurii Petrov, Sabine Siesling, Hester F Lingsma, Linetta B Koppert, Lara W A Vreven, Adri C Voogd, Maria Margarete Karsten, Lea Doppelbauer, Pimrapat Gebert, Narsis Kiani, Simona Borstnar, Paul D P Pharoah, Elham Hedayati, Ewout W Steyerberg, David van Klaveren
{"title":"External validation of PREDICT Breast v3.1 for overall survival in international cohorts, including young and invasive lobular subgroups.","authors":"Elfi M Verheul, Frank Doornkamp, Iurii Petrov, Sabine Siesling, Hester F Lingsma, Linetta B Koppert, Lara W A Vreven, Adri C Voogd, Maria Margarete Karsten, Lea Doppelbauer, Pimrapat Gebert, Narsis Kiani, Simona Borstnar, Paul D P Pharoah, Elham Hedayati, Ewout W Steyerberg, David van Klaveren","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-07958-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>PREDICT Breast is an online tool that provides survival predictions for patients with early-stage breast cancer, for different treatments after surgery. External validation is essential to assess model performance across populations and healthcare settings. We aimed to externally validate PREDICT using clinical practice data from the Netherlands, Sweden, and Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We validated PREDICT in national populations (Netherlands, N = 221,636; Sweden, N = 84,928) and in two specific subgroups: patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) (Netherlands, N = 26,834; Sweden, N = 10,563; Slovenia, N = 341) and patients aged ≤ 40 years (Netherlands, N = 9995; Sweden, N = 2694). We assessed discrimination with the 10-year area under the curve (AUC) and calibration of 10-year mortality predictions through calibration plots, intercepts and slopes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PREDICT v3.1 discriminated well in the national populations (Netherlands AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76), with similar discrimination in ILC patients (Netherlands 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77; Slovenia 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.83). Calibration showed slight underestimation of mortality risk in the Netherlands (intercept 0.13; slope 1.01), and was near perfect in the Swedish population (intercept 0.04; slope 1.05). Amongst ILC patients, we observed some underestimation of mortality (Netherlands intercept 0.20; Sweden intercept 0.10; Slovenia intercept 0.02). In young patients, miscalibration was observed (Netherlands, intercept 0.21, slope 0.79; Sweden, intercept 0.08, slope 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREDICT v3.1 is generally well calibrated and suitable for clinical use in the evaluated European populations. Efforts to improve PREDICT should focus on more accurate predictions for younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"217 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13086695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-07958-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: PREDICT Breast is an online tool that provides survival predictions for patients with early-stage breast cancer, for different treatments after surgery. External validation is essential to assess model performance across populations and healthcare settings. We aimed to externally validate PREDICT using clinical practice data from the Netherlands, Sweden, and Slovenia.
Methods: We validated PREDICT in national populations (Netherlands, N = 221,636; Sweden, N = 84,928) and in two specific subgroups: patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) (Netherlands, N = 26,834; Sweden, N = 10,563; Slovenia, N = 341) and patients aged ≤ 40 years (Netherlands, N = 9995; Sweden, N = 2694). We assessed discrimination with the 10-year area under the curve (AUC) and calibration of 10-year mortality predictions through calibration plots, intercepts and slopes.
Results: PREDICT v3.1 discriminated well in the national populations (Netherlands AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76), with similar discrimination in ILC patients (Netherlands 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77; Slovenia 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.83). Calibration showed slight underestimation of mortality risk in the Netherlands (intercept 0.13; slope 1.01), and was near perfect in the Swedish population (intercept 0.04; slope 1.05). Amongst ILC patients, we observed some underestimation of mortality (Netherlands intercept 0.20; Sweden intercept 0.10; Slovenia intercept 0.02). In young patients, miscalibration was observed (Netherlands, intercept 0.21, slope 0.79; Sweden, intercept 0.08, slope 0.85).
Conclusion: PREDICT v3.1 is generally well calibrated and suitable for clinical use in the evaluated European populations. Efforts to improve PREDICT should focus on more accurate predictions for younger patients.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.