External validation of PREDICT Breast v3.1 for overall survival in international cohorts, including young and invasive lobular subgroups.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Elfi M Verheul, Frank Doornkamp, Iurii Petrov, Sabine Siesling, Hester F Lingsma, Linetta B Koppert, Lara W A Vreven, Adri C Voogd, Maria Margarete Karsten, Lea Doppelbauer, Pimrapat Gebert, Narsis Kiani, Simona Borstnar, Paul D P Pharoah, Elham Hedayati, Ewout W Steyerberg, David van Klaveren
{"title":"External validation of PREDICT Breast v3.1 for overall survival in international cohorts, including young and invasive lobular subgroups.","authors":"Elfi M Verheul, Frank Doornkamp, Iurii Petrov, Sabine Siesling, Hester F Lingsma, Linetta B Koppert, Lara W A Vreven, Adri C Voogd, Maria Margarete Karsten, Lea Doppelbauer, Pimrapat Gebert, Narsis Kiani, Simona Borstnar, Paul D P Pharoah, Elham Hedayati, Ewout W Steyerberg, David van Klaveren","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-07958-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>PREDICT Breast is an online tool that provides survival predictions for patients with early-stage breast cancer, for different treatments after surgery. External validation is essential to assess model performance across populations and healthcare settings. We aimed to externally validate PREDICT using clinical practice data from the Netherlands, Sweden, and Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We validated PREDICT in national populations (Netherlands, N = 221,636; Sweden, N = 84,928) and in two specific subgroups: patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) (Netherlands, N = 26,834; Sweden, N = 10,563; Slovenia, N = 341) and patients aged ≤ 40 years (Netherlands, N = 9995; Sweden, N = 2694). We assessed discrimination with the 10-year area under the curve (AUC) and calibration of 10-year mortality predictions through calibration plots, intercepts and slopes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PREDICT v3.1 discriminated well in the national populations (Netherlands AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76), with similar discrimination in ILC patients (Netherlands 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77; Slovenia 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.83). Calibration showed slight underestimation of mortality risk in the Netherlands (intercept 0.13; slope 1.01), and was near perfect in the Swedish population (intercept 0.04; slope 1.05). Amongst ILC patients, we observed some underestimation of mortality (Netherlands intercept 0.20; Sweden intercept 0.10; Slovenia intercept 0.02). In young patients, miscalibration was observed (Netherlands, intercept 0.21, slope 0.79; Sweden, intercept 0.08, slope 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREDICT v3.1 is generally well calibrated and suitable for clinical use in the evaluated European populations. Efforts to improve PREDICT should focus on more accurate predictions for younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"217 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13086695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-07958-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: PREDICT Breast is an online tool that provides survival predictions for patients with early-stage breast cancer, for different treatments after surgery. External validation is essential to assess model performance across populations and healthcare settings. We aimed to externally validate PREDICT using clinical practice data from the Netherlands, Sweden, and Slovenia.

Methods: We validated PREDICT in national populations (Netherlands, N = 221,636; Sweden, N = 84,928) and in two specific subgroups: patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) (Netherlands, N = 26,834; Sweden, N = 10,563; Slovenia, N = 341) and patients aged ≤ 40 years (Netherlands, N = 9995; Sweden, N = 2694). We assessed discrimination with the 10-year area under the curve (AUC) and calibration of 10-year mortality predictions through calibration plots, intercepts and slopes.

Results: PREDICT v3.1 discriminated well in the national populations (Netherlands AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76), with similar discrimination in ILC patients (Netherlands 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.76; Sweden 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77; Slovenia 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.83). Calibration showed slight underestimation of mortality risk in the Netherlands (intercept 0.13; slope 1.01), and was near perfect in the Swedish population (intercept 0.04; slope 1.05). Amongst ILC patients, we observed some underestimation of mortality (Netherlands intercept 0.20; Sweden intercept 0.10; Slovenia intercept 0.02). In young patients, miscalibration was observed (Netherlands, intercept 0.21, slope 0.79; Sweden, intercept 0.08, slope 0.85).

Conclusion: PREDICT v3.1 is generally well calibrated and suitable for clinical use in the evaluated European populations. Efforts to improve PREDICT should focus on more accurate predictions for younger patients.

在包括年轻和浸润性小叶亚组在内的国际队列中,对PREDICT Breast v3.1总体生存率的外部验证。
目的:PREDICT Breast是一个在线工具,为早期乳腺癌患者提供手术后不同治疗方法的生存预测。外部验证对于评估模型在人群和医疗保健环境中的性能至关重要。我们的目的是使用来自荷兰、瑞典和斯洛文尼亚的临床实践数据对PREDICT进行外部验证。方法:我们在国家人群(荷兰,N = 221,636;瑞典,N = 84,928)和两个特定亚组中验证了PREDICT:浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)患者(荷兰,N = 26,834;瑞典,N = 10,563;斯洛文尼亚,N = 341)和年龄≤40岁的患者(荷兰,N = 9995;瑞典,N = 2694)。我们用10年曲线下面积(AUC)评估了判别性,并通过校准图、截距和斜率对10年死亡率预测进行了校准。结果:PREDICT v3.1在全国人群中有很好的鉴别性(荷兰AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.75-0.76;瑞典0.75,95% CI 0.75-0.76),在ILC患者中也有类似的鉴别性(荷兰0.76,95% CI 0.74-0.76;瑞典0.75,95% CI 0.73-0.77;斯洛文尼亚0.78,95% CI 0.71-0.83)。校正结果显示,荷兰人群的死亡率风险被轻微低估(截距0.13,斜率1.01),瑞典人群的死亡率风险被几乎完全低估(截距0.04,斜率1.05)。在ILC患者中,我们观察到一些对死亡率的低估(荷兰的截距为0.20;瑞典的截距为0.10;斯洛文尼亚的截距为0.02)。在年轻患者中,观察到误校准(荷兰,截距0.21,斜率0.79;瑞典,截距0.08,斜率0.85)。结论:PREDICT v3.1总体上校准良好,适合在评估的欧洲人群中临床使用。改善PREDICT的努力应该集中在对年轻患者更准确的预测上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书