Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lorrany Larisse Costa Rodrigues, Lara de Holanda Jucá Silveira, Luiz Felipe C de Almeida, Bianca Gonzaga de Freitas, Valbert Oliveira Costa Filho, Mariana Macambira Noronha, Angela Theresa Zuffo Yabrude, Rodolfo Garza Morales, Andréia Cristina de Melo, Jessé Lopes da Silva, Paolo Tarantino, Felipe Batalini
{"title":"Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lorrany Larisse Costa Rodrigues, Lara de Holanda Jucá Silveira, Luiz Felipe C de Almeida, Bianca Gonzaga de Freitas, Valbert Oliveira Costa Filho, Mariana Macambira Noronha, Angela Theresa Zuffo Yabrude, Rodolfo Garza Morales, Andréia Cristina de Melo, Jessé Lopes da Silva, Paolo Tarantino, Felipe Batalini","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-07962-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The development of endocrine resistance is frequent in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR + /HER2-ABC), particularly after CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure. Next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have been developed to improve estrogen receptor blockade; however, randomized trials have yielded heterogeneous results with uncertain clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA 2020 compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with PROSPERO registration was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2025 for phase II-III randomized trials comparing oral SERDs with standard endocrine therapy (ET) in HR + /HER2-ABC after prior ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Treatment effects were pooled using random effects models with prespecified subgroup analyses by ESR1 mutation status and key clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized trials, including 2808 patients, were analyzed. Oral SERDs improved PFS versus standard ET in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.89). ORR was higher with oral SERDs (odds ratio [OR] 1.67; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.28), corresponding to absolute response rates of approximately 21% versus 14%. An OS improvement was observed (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90), although follow-up was limited. Benefit was concentrated in ESR1-mutated tumors (PFS, HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.67) with no significant PFS advantage in ESR1 wild-type disease. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with oral SERDs compared with the control ET.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pooled randomized evidence supports a clinically meaningful benefit of oral SERDs over standard ET after endocrine progression in HR + /HER2-ABC, with the strongest and most consistent efficacy observed in ESR1-mutated disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"217 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-07962-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The development of endocrine resistance is frequent in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR + /HER2-ABC), particularly after CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure. Next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have been developed to improve estrogen receptor blockade; however, randomized trials have yielded heterogeneous results with uncertain clinical benefit.

Methods: A PRISMA 2020 compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with PROSPERO registration was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2025 for phase II-III randomized trials comparing oral SERDs with standard endocrine therapy (ET) in HR + /HER2-ABC after prior ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Treatment effects were pooled using random effects models with prespecified subgroup analyses by ESR1 mutation status and key clinical characteristics.

Results: Six randomized trials, including 2808 patients, were analyzed. Oral SERDs improved PFS versus standard ET in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.89). ORR was higher with oral SERDs (odds ratio [OR] 1.67; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.28), corresponding to absolute response rates of approximately 21% versus 14%. An OS improvement was observed (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90), although follow-up was limited. Benefit was concentrated in ESR1-mutated tumors (PFS, HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.67) with no significant PFS advantage in ESR1 wild-type disease. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with oral SERDs compared with the control ET.

Conclusions: Pooled randomized evidence supports a clinically meaningful benefit of oral SERDs over standard ET after endocrine progression in HR + /HER2-ABC, with the strongest and most consistent efficacy observed in ESR1-mutated disease.

口服选择性雌激素受体降解剂治疗激素受体阳性、her2阴性的晚期乳腺癌:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:内分泌抵抗在激素受体阳性、her2阴性的晚期乳腺癌(HR + /HER2-ABC)中很常见,特别是在CDK4/6抑制剂暴露后。新一代口服选择性雌激素受体降解剂(SERDs)已被开发用于改善雌激素受体阻断;然而,随机试验产生了不确定临床益处的异质结果。方法:采用PROSPERO注册,进行符合PRISMA 2020标准的系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL检索了截至2025年10月的II-III期随机试验,比较口服serd与标准内分泌治疗(ET)在先前ET后HR + /HER2-ABC的疗效。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。采用随机效应模型,根据ESR1突变状态和关键临床特征进行预先指定的亚组分析,汇总治疗效果。结果:共分析6项随机试验,共2808例患者。与标准ET相比,口服serd改善了总体人群的PFS(风险比[HR] 0.79; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.70至0.89)。口服serd的ORR更高(优势比[OR] 1.67; 95% CI 1.23至2.28),对应于绝对缓解率约为21%对14%。尽管随访有限,但观察到OS改善(HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57至0.90)。获益主要集中在ESR1突变的肿瘤中(PFS, HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.48 - 0.67),而在ESR1野生型疾病中PFS无显著优势。与对照组ET相比,口服serd的胃肠道不良事件更频繁。结论:综合随机证据支持,在HR + /HER2-ABC内分泌进展后,口服serd比标准ET有临床意义的益处,在esr1突变疾病中观察到最强且最一致的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书