Sacituzumab-induced severe or febrile neutropenia and G-CSF utilization and cost for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Grace Tam, Donald Waddell, Jincong Q Freeman, Nan Chen, Heng Yang
{"title":"Sacituzumab-induced severe or febrile neutropenia and G-CSF utilization and cost for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.","authors":"Grace Tam, Donald Waddell, Jincong Q Freeman, Nan Chen, Heng Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10549-026-07971-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Severe neutropenia (SN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) are clinically significant safety concerns of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG). We sought to compare the rates of SN and FN from clinical trials to real-world experience, correlate factors with SN and FN, and quantify granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use in HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with SG for advanced HER2- BC at a single US institution with a diverse patient population. The rates of SN and FN, stratified by receptor status, were compared to their respective phase III clinical trials. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with SN and FN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 87 patients treated with SG, 10 patients received primary prophylaxis. Of the 77 patients who didn't receive primary G-CSF prophylaxis, 49% and 3.9% patients developed SN and FN, respectively. SN and FN rates did not differ in the HR + /HER- mBC or mTNBC subgroups compared to clinical trials. Factors evaluated in this study were not shown to be associated with SN. Overall, 44% (38/87) required a dose interruption or reduction due to SN or FN. 11% (10/87) and 60% (52/87) received G-CSF as primary and secondary prophylaxis respectively, with a total G-CSF drug cost of $2.1 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG-induced SN and FN rates were similar to those reported in clinical trials, both in the HR + /HER- mBC and mTNBC groups. Due to small sample size, we did not identify any statistically significant risk factors of SG-associated SN. Our study provided insights into G-CSF use patterns and costs in real-world SG therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":"217 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13086668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-07971-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Severe neutropenia (SN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) are clinically significant safety concerns of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG). We sought to compare the rates of SN and FN from clinical trials to real-world experience, correlate factors with SN and FN, and quantify granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use in HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with SG for advanced HER2- BC at a single US institution with a diverse patient population. The rates of SN and FN, stratified by receptor status, were compared to their respective phase III clinical trials. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with SN and FN.
Results: Of 87 patients treated with SG, 10 patients received primary prophylaxis. Of the 77 patients who didn't receive primary G-CSF prophylaxis, 49% and 3.9% patients developed SN and FN, respectively. SN and FN rates did not differ in the HR + /HER- mBC or mTNBC subgroups compared to clinical trials. Factors evaluated in this study were not shown to be associated with SN. Overall, 44% (38/87) required a dose interruption or reduction due to SN or FN. 11% (10/87) and 60% (52/87) received G-CSF as primary and secondary prophylaxis respectively, with a total G-CSF drug cost of $2.1 million.
Conclusions: SG-induced SN and FN rates were similar to those reported in clinical trials, both in the HR + /HER- mBC and mTNBC groups. Due to small sample size, we did not identify any statistically significant risk factors of SG-associated SN. Our study provided insights into G-CSF use patterns and costs in real-world SG therapy.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.