Nadia Aissaoui, Clement Delmas, Hamid Merdji, Guillaume Schurtz, Guillaume Baudry, Antoine Beurton, Florence Boissier, Laurent Bonello, Bernard Cholley, Nicolas Combaret, Alain Combes, Charles-Henri David, Daniel De Backer, Pierre Grégoire Guinot, Olfa Hamzaoui, Brahim Harbaoui, Julien Imbault, Nicolas Nesseler, Antoine Kimmoun, Michel Kindo, Guillaume Lebreton, Guillaume Leurent, Bruno Levy, Stéphane Manzo-Silberman, Anne-Céline Martin, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Imane Adda, Joy Mootien, Alexandre Ouattara, Matteo Pozzi, Etienne Puymirat, Francois Roubille, Antonin Trimaille, Aurore Ughetto, Eric Van Belle, Eric Bonnefoy, Khaldoun Kuteifan
{"title":"Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Nadia Aissaoui, Clement Delmas, Hamid Merdji, Guillaume Schurtz, Guillaume Baudry, Antoine Beurton, Florence Boissier, Laurent Bonello, Bernard Cholley, Nicolas Combaret, Alain Combes, Charles-Henri David, Daniel De Backer, Pierre Grégoire Guinot, Olfa Hamzaoui, Brahim Harbaoui, Julien Imbault, Nicolas Nesseler, Antoine Kimmoun, Michel Kindo, Guillaume Lebreton, Guillaume Leurent, Bruno Levy, Stéphane Manzo-Silberman, Anne-Céline Martin, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Imane Adda, Joy Mootien, Alexandre Ouattara, Matteo Pozzi, Etienne Puymirat, Francois Roubille, Antonin Trimaille, Aurore Ughetto, Eric Van Belle, Eric Bonnefoy, Khaldoun Kuteifan","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last specific international European recommendations regarding the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) regardless of the etiology were issued over 10 years ago. We present herein recommendations for the management of CS in adults, developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system by an expert group of from the French Intensive Care Society [Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)] and the French Society of Cardiology [Société Française de Cardiologie (SFC)], with the participation of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)], and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardio-Vasculaire (SFCTCV)]. The recommendations covered six fields of application: CS teams and expert centers, symptomatic medical management, etiological management, organ support, temporary circulatory support and de-escalation and early post-CS management. Twenty-three \"Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome\" (PICO) questions were identified, leading to 41 recommendations regarding management of CS in adult patients. Seven recommendations were scored with high level of evidence (Grade 1), 11 with moderate level of evidence (Grade 2) and 17 with low level of evidence (Expert opinion). In 6 cases, the experts were not able to give an answer. All of the recommendations obtained strong agreement from the expert committee. The experts highlight the fact that optimal management of CS requires organization including a structured, multidisciplinary shock team and regional referral network, applying standardized protocols for diagnosis and staging. Early etiological treatment-such as culprit-lesion revascularization or urgent valve intervention-is central to improve outcomes. Hemodynamic support should prioritize norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor and privilege selective inotrope use. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (Impella, VA-ECMO) should be reserved for carefully selected patients following discussion by the expert team.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100038"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13081668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The last specific international European recommendations regarding the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) regardless of the etiology were issued over 10 years ago. We present herein recommendations for the management of CS in adults, developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system by an expert group of from the French Intensive Care Society [Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)] and the French Society of Cardiology [Société Française de Cardiologie (SFC)], with the participation of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)], and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardio-Vasculaire (SFCTCV)]. The recommendations covered six fields of application: CS teams and expert centers, symptomatic medical management, etiological management, organ support, temporary circulatory support and de-escalation and early post-CS management. Twenty-three "Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome" (PICO) questions were identified, leading to 41 recommendations regarding management of CS in adult patients. Seven recommendations were scored with high level of evidence (Grade 1), 11 with moderate level of evidence (Grade 2) and 17 with low level of evidence (Expert opinion). In 6 cases, the experts were not able to give an answer. All of the recommendations obtained strong agreement from the expert committee. The experts highlight the fact that optimal management of CS requires organization including a structured, multidisciplinary shock team and regional referral network, applying standardized protocols for diagnosis and staging. Early etiological treatment-such as culprit-lesion revascularization or urgent valve intervention-is central to improve outcomes. Hemodynamic support should prioritize norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor and privilege selective inotrope use. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (Impella, VA-ECMO) should be reserved for carefully selected patients following discussion by the expert team.
关于心源性休克(CS)管理的最后一项具体国际欧洲建议是在10多年前发布的,而不考虑病因。我们在此提出成人CS管理的建议,由法国重症监护学会(sociacermedicare de raise (SRLF))和法国心脏病学会(sociaclesfranaise de Cardiologie (SFC))的专家组根据建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)系统制定。在法国麻醉和重症监护学会[法国医疗器械与外科手术学会(SFAR)]和法国胸心血管外科学会[法国医疗器械与外科学会(sctcv)]的参与下。这些建议涵盖六个应用领域:CS小组和专家中心、症状医疗管理、病因管理、器官支持、临时循环支持以及降级和CS后早期管理。确定了23个“患者干预比较结果”(PICO)问题,得出41条关于成人CS患者管理的建议。7项建议被评为高证据水平(1级),11项建议被评为中等证据水平(2级),17项建议被评为低证据水平(专家意见)。在6个案例中,专家无法给出答案。所有的建议都得到了专家委员会的强烈同意。专家们强调,CS的最佳管理需要组织,包括一个结构化的、多学科的休克小组和区域转诊网络,应用标准化的诊断和分期方案。早期病因治疗——如罪魁祸首病变血运重建术或紧急瓣膜介入治疗——是改善预后的关键。血流动力学支持应优先考虑去甲肾上腺素作为一线血管加压药,并优先选择使用正性肌力。临时机械循环支持(Impella, VA-ECMO)应保留给经过专家小组讨论后精心挑选的患者。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.