Navigating Cetacean Mitochondrial Genome Data: Identifying Coverage and Deficiencies in Public Repositories.

IF 5.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Luís Afonso, Alessandro Lagrotteria, Ana Sofia Lavrador, Paula Suarez-Bregua, Miguel Álvarez-González, Raul Valente, Mads Reinholdt Jensen, Camilo Saavedra, Daniel Kumazawa Morais, Isabel Sousa-Pinto, Graham J Pierce, Catarina Magalhães, Ana Mafalda Correia
{"title":"Navigating Cetacean Mitochondrial Genome Data: Identifying Coverage and Deficiencies in Public Repositories.","authors":"Luís Afonso, Alessandro Lagrotteria, Ana Sofia Lavrador, Paula Suarez-Bregua, Miguel Álvarez-González, Raul Valente, Mads Reinholdt Jensen, Camilo Saavedra, Daniel Kumazawa Morais, Isabel Sousa-Pinto, Graham J Pierce, Catarina Magalhães, Ana Mafalda Correia","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic reference databases underpin a wide range of molecular approaches used to study cetacean biodiversity, including environmental DNA (eDNA), yet their reliability depends critically on data completeness, taxonomic accuracy, and metadata quality. Here, we present the first global assessment of mitochondrial sequence availability for cetaceans, evaluating taxonomic coverage, geographic representation, metadata completeness, and the distribution of five commonly targeted mitochondrial markers (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, D-loop, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b). We retrieved 17,569 cetacean accessions from the NCBI Nucleotide database and an additional 259 COI-only records from BOLD Systems. Sequence availability was strongly biased toward Delphinidae and Balaenopteridae, whereas several families, notably Ziphiidae, were markedly underrepresented. We also identified discrepancies between database records and currently accepted cetacean taxonomy (e.g., outdated genera, non-accepted species, and collapsed higher-level taxa). Among markers, the D-loop dominated database representation, largely as standalone sequences (12,437 records), reflecting historical and current sequencing priorities and underscoring its continued relevance for population-level studies and eDNA marker development. Only 38% of accessions included geographic metadata, with georeferenced records concentrated primarily in the Americas and the Northwest Pacific, while large regions, including much of Africa, remained poorly represented. Although broad geographic patterns mirrored known family distributions, pronounced regional and taxonomic gaps persist. Our results highlight critical deficiencies in mitochondrial reference databases for cetaceans and emphasise the need for improved metadata standards, targeted sequencing of underrepresented taxa and regions, and open data sharing to enhance the effectiveness and global applicability of eDNA-based cetacean monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 3","pages":"e70141"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13087493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic reference databases underpin a wide range of molecular approaches used to study cetacean biodiversity, including environmental DNA (eDNA), yet their reliability depends critically on data completeness, taxonomic accuracy, and metadata quality. Here, we present the first global assessment of mitochondrial sequence availability for cetaceans, evaluating taxonomic coverage, geographic representation, metadata completeness, and the distribution of five commonly targeted mitochondrial markers (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, D-loop, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b). We retrieved 17,569 cetacean accessions from the NCBI Nucleotide database and an additional 259 COI-only records from BOLD Systems. Sequence availability was strongly biased toward Delphinidae and Balaenopteridae, whereas several families, notably Ziphiidae, were markedly underrepresented. We also identified discrepancies between database records and currently accepted cetacean taxonomy (e.g., outdated genera, non-accepted species, and collapsed higher-level taxa). Among markers, the D-loop dominated database representation, largely as standalone sequences (12,437 records), reflecting historical and current sequencing priorities and underscoring its continued relevance for population-level studies and eDNA marker development. Only 38% of accessions included geographic metadata, with georeferenced records concentrated primarily in the Americas and the Northwest Pacific, while large regions, including much of Africa, remained poorly represented. Although broad geographic patterns mirrored known family distributions, pronounced regional and taxonomic gaps persist. Our results highlight critical deficiencies in mitochondrial reference databases for cetaceans and emphasise the need for improved metadata standards, targeted sequencing of underrepresented taxa and regions, and open data sharing to enhance the effectiveness and global applicability of eDNA-based cetacean monitoring.

导航鲸类线粒体基因组数据:确定公共存储库的覆盖范围和缺陷。
遗传参考数据库是研究鲸类生物多样性的广泛分子方法的基础,包括环境DNA (eDNA),但其可靠性主要取决于数据完整性、分类准确性和元数据质量。本文首次对鲸类动物线粒体序列的可用性进行了全球评估,评估了五种常见的线粒体标记(12S rRNA、16S rRNA、D-loop、细胞色素氧化酶I和细胞色素b)的分类覆盖范围、地理代表性、元数据完整性和分布。我们从NCBI Nucleotide数据库中检索了17,569条鲸类条目,并从BOLD Systems中检索了259条COI-only记录。序列可用性偏向于飞燕科和Balaenopteridae,而一些科(尤其是Ziphiidae)的代表性明显不足。我们还发现了数据库记录与目前公认的鲸类分类之间的差异(例如,过时的属,未被接受的物种和崩溃的高级分类群)。在标记中,d环主导数据库表示,主要作为独立序列(12,437条记录),反映了历史和当前的测序优先级,并强调其与人群水平研究和eDNA标记开发的持续相关性。只有38%的数据库包含地理元数据,地理参考记录主要集中在美洲和西北太平洋,而包括非洲大部分地区在内的大区域仍然缺乏代表性。虽然广泛的地理格局反映了已知的家庭分布,但明显的区域和分类差距仍然存在。我们的研究结果强调了鲸类线粒体参考数据库的关键缺陷,并强调需要改进元数据标准,对代表性不足的分类群和地区进行有针对性的测序,以及开放数据共享,以提高基于edna的鲸类监测的有效性和全球适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书