{"title":"Data-driven cluster analysis of adults with prediabetes: Findings from the Japan diabetes prevention study","authors":"Naoki Sakane, Kaoru Takahashi, Akiko Suganuma, Masayuki Domichi, Kazuyo Tsushita, Hideshi Kuzuya","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To identify distinct metabolic subtypes among Japanese adults with prediabetes and examine their association with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and response to lifestyle interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from 295 adults with impaired glucose tolerance (mean age 50.4 ± 14.6 years) enrolled in the Japanese Diabetes Prevention Program, a randomized controlled trial with up to 6 years of follow-up, were analyzed. Participants with a history of diabetes, gastrectomy, or exercise contraindications were excluded from the study. <i>K</i>-means clustering (<i>k</i> = 2–5) was applied to baseline indices, including HbA1c, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, and HDL-cholesterol. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for interpretation. Incident T2D was defined as a repeat 75-g OGTT. Kaplan–Meier and Cox models were adjusted for baseline HbA1c estimated cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three clusters emerged at <i>k</i> = 3, and PCA (two components explaining 68.0% of the variance) clearly separated the clusters based on insulin resistance and glycemic indices. Cluster 1, Metabolically Resilient Prediabetes (<i>n</i> = 127, MRP), showed the most favorable metabolic profile and lowest T2D risk. Cluster 2, Insulin-Insufficient Prediabetes (<i>n</i> = 109, IIP), exhibited reduced β-cell function and the highest T2D risk, but derived the greatest benefit from lifestyle intervention (adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.95, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Cluster 3, Severe Insulin-Resistant Prediabetes (SIRP; <i>n</i> = 59), displayed obesity-related insulin resistance and an intermediate risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Unsupervised clustering identified three biologically distinct prediabetic subtypes that differed in diabetes risk and intervention responsiveness, supporting a precision prevention framework for Japanese adults with prediabetes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"17 6","pages":"961-969"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.70302","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.70302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To identify distinct metabolic subtypes among Japanese adults with prediabetes and examine their association with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and response to lifestyle interventions.
Methods
Data from 295 adults with impaired glucose tolerance (mean age 50.4 ± 14.6 years) enrolled in the Japanese Diabetes Prevention Program, a randomized controlled trial with up to 6 years of follow-up, were analyzed. Participants with a history of diabetes, gastrectomy, or exercise contraindications were excluded from the study. K-means clustering (k = 2–5) was applied to baseline indices, including HbA1c, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, and HDL-cholesterol. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for interpretation. Incident T2D was defined as a repeat 75-g OGTT. Kaplan–Meier and Cox models were adjusted for baseline HbA1c estimated cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs).
Results
Three clusters emerged at k = 3, and PCA (two components explaining 68.0% of the variance) clearly separated the clusters based on insulin resistance and glycemic indices. Cluster 1, Metabolically Resilient Prediabetes (n = 127, MRP), showed the most favorable metabolic profile and lowest T2D risk. Cluster 2, Insulin-Insufficient Prediabetes (n = 109, IIP), exhibited reduced β-cell function and the highest T2D risk, but derived the greatest benefit from lifestyle intervention (adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.95, P < 0.05). Cluster 3, Severe Insulin-Resistant Prediabetes (SIRP; n = 59), displayed obesity-related insulin resistance and an intermediate risk.
Conclusions
Unsupervised clustering identified three biologically distinct prediabetic subtypes that differed in diabetes risk and intervention responsiveness, supporting a precision prevention framework for Japanese adults with prediabetes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).