The Normalisation of Violence Against Workers in Aged Care Facilities: The Views of Managers, Nurses and Personal Care Assistants

IF 8 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Human Resource Management Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-06 Epub Date: 2025-12-09 DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.70026
Timothy Bartram, Jillian Cavanagh, Patricia Pariona-Cabrera, Hannah Meacham
{"title":"The Normalisation of Violence Against Workers in Aged Care Facilities: The Views of Managers, Nurses and Personal Care Assistants","authors":"Timothy Bartram,&nbsp;Jillian Cavanagh,&nbsp;Patricia Pariona-Cabrera,&nbsp;Hannah Meacham","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For nurses and personal care assistants (PCAs), working in aged care facilities, incidents of violence are considered common place and even accepted as part of the job. Importantly, non-physical violence often demonstrated in use of the power through managers' domination over employees, known as symbolic violence, may explain the lack of systematic and efficacious management of workplace violence. We take a qualitative approach to examine violence in aged care facilities in Australia by conducting semi-structured interviews with 60 participants. We employ Bourdieu's theory of practice (1977) and examine the social structure, the use of capital, and rules of the workplace to understand the use of symbolic violence toward nurses and PCAs, and subsequent impact on workplace violence. The study reports that HR departments are fundamentally ineffectual, and managers prioritise fiscal outcomes and fail to support nurses and PCAs, all contributing to symbolic violence. In effect, nurses and particularly PCAs have no choice but to allow managers to perpetuate symbolic violence because of the existential power imbalance. From the perspectives of workers, there is lack of systemic HRM and management responses to prevent and manage the effects of workplace violence. Our theoretical contribution to the HRM literature extends beyond the context of our study to more completely understand the tensions within Bourdieu's theory and the interconnections between the hierarchy, managers, HR departments and workers. By understanding such complexities, we shed new light on the process of how symbolic violence is used to dominate workers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"36 2","pages":"305-316"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.70026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For nurses and personal care assistants (PCAs), working in aged care facilities, incidents of violence are considered common place and even accepted as part of the job. Importantly, non-physical violence often demonstrated in use of the power through managers' domination over employees, known as symbolic violence, may explain the lack of systematic and efficacious management of workplace violence. We take a qualitative approach to examine violence in aged care facilities in Australia by conducting semi-structured interviews with 60 participants. We employ Bourdieu's theory of practice (1977) and examine the social structure, the use of capital, and rules of the workplace to understand the use of symbolic violence toward nurses and PCAs, and subsequent impact on workplace violence. The study reports that HR departments are fundamentally ineffectual, and managers prioritise fiscal outcomes and fail to support nurses and PCAs, all contributing to symbolic violence. In effect, nurses and particularly PCAs have no choice but to allow managers to perpetuate symbolic violence because of the existential power imbalance. From the perspectives of workers, there is lack of systemic HRM and management responses to prevent and manage the effects of workplace violence. Our theoretical contribution to the HRM literature extends beyond the context of our study to more completely understand the tensions within Bourdieu's theory and the interconnections between the hierarchy, managers, HR departments and workers. By understanding such complexities, we shed new light on the process of how symbolic violence is used to dominate workers.

老年护理机构对工人的暴力行为正常化:管理者、护士和个人护理助理的观点
对于在老年护理机构工作的护士和个人护理助理(PCAs)来说,暴力事件被认为是常见的,甚至被接受为工作的一部分。重要的是,非身体暴力往往表现在使用权力,通过管理者对员工的统治,被称为象征性暴力,可以解释缺乏系统和有效的管理工作场所暴力。我们通过对60名参与者进行半结构化访谈,采用定性方法来检查澳大利亚老年护理机构中的暴力行为。我们采用布迪厄的实践理论(1977),考察社会结构、资本的使用和工作场所的规则,以理解对护士和公共护理人员使用象征性暴力,以及随后对工作场所暴力的影响。该研究报告称,人力资源部门从根本上是无效的,管理者优先考虑财政结果,不支持护士和公共护理师,所有这些都导致了象征性暴力。实际上,由于存在的权力不平衡,护士,特别是pca,别无选择,只能允许管理者延续象征性暴力。从工人的角度来看,缺乏系统的人力资源管理和管理措施来预防和管理工作场所暴力的影响。我们对人力资源管理文献的理论贡献超越了我们的研究背景,更全面地理解了布迪厄理论中的紧张关系,以及等级制度、管理者、人力资源部门和工人之间的相互联系。通过理解这种复杂性,我们对象征性暴力如何被用来支配工人的过程有了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书