HR-Led Co-Design for Neuroinclusion: A Critical Pragmatist and Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Transforming Neuronormative Organisations

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Human Resource Management Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-06 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.70018
Mustafa F. Özbilgin, Cihat Erbil, Milena Tekeste, Nur Gundogdu
{"title":"HR-Led Co-Design for Neuroinclusion: A Critical Pragmatist and Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Transforming Neuronormative Organisations","authors":"Mustafa F. Özbilgin,&nbsp;Cihat Erbil,&nbsp;Milena Tekeste,&nbsp;Nur Gundogdu","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite growing interest in neurodiversity in the workplace, most organisational responses remain fragmented, compliance-driven, and disconnected from the lived realities of neurodivergent individuals. This paper addresses the limitations of current approaches by proposing a process model of HR-led co-design for neuroinclusion, grounded in a dual-theoretical framework that combines critical pragmatism and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory. Drawing on an abductive synthesis of literature and practice-based insights, we develop a process model that identifies four interrelated organisational challenges: ignorance and lack of buy-in, legal ambiguity, disclosure dilemmas, and resistance to systemic change. The model offers a set of HR-led co-design interventions and outcomes that centre neurodivergent perspectives in redesigning policies, practices, and organisational systems. Critical pragmatism provides the ethical and epistemological foundation for participatory inquiry and institutional transformation, while STS supports the structural integration of inclusive practices. This paper contributes to HRM theory by repositioning HR as a catalyst for collaborative, recursive, and justice-oriented organisational change. Implications for future research and practice include the need for participatory, cross-contextual, and intersectional studies of neuroinclusion, as well as attention to the design and evaluation of HR systems that enable meaningful co-production.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"36 2","pages":"192-204"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.70018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing interest in neurodiversity in the workplace, most organisational responses remain fragmented, compliance-driven, and disconnected from the lived realities of neurodivergent individuals. This paper addresses the limitations of current approaches by proposing a process model of HR-led co-design for neuroinclusion, grounded in a dual-theoretical framework that combines critical pragmatism and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory. Drawing on an abductive synthesis of literature and practice-based insights, we develop a process model that identifies four interrelated organisational challenges: ignorance and lack of buy-in, legal ambiguity, disclosure dilemmas, and resistance to systemic change. The model offers a set of HR-led co-design interventions and outcomes that centre neurodivergent perspectives in redesigning policies, practices, and organisational systems. Critical pragmatism provides the ethical and epistemological foundation for participatory inquiry and institutional transformation, while STS supports the structural integration of inclusive practices. This paper contributes to HRM theory by repositioning HR as a catalyst for collaborative, recursive, and justice-oriented organisational change. Implications for future research and practice include the need for participatory, cross-contextual, and intersectional studies of neuroinclusion, as well as attention to the design and evaluation of HR systems that enable meaningful co-production.

Abstract Image

以人力资源为主导的神经包容的共同设计:一个关键的实用主义者和社会技术系统方法来改造神经规范性组织
尽管人们对工作场所的神经多样性越来越感兴趣,但大多数组织的反应仍然是碎片化的,服从驱动的,与神经分化个体的生活现实脱节。本文通过提出一个以人力资源为主导的神经包容协同设计过程模型,解决了当前方法的局限性,该模型基于结合了批判实用主义和社会技术系统(STS)理论的双重理论框架。根据文献和基于实践的见解,我们开发了一个过程模型,该模型确定了四个相互关联的组织挑战:无知和缺乏支持、法律模糊、披露困境以及对系统变革的抵制。该模型提供了一套以人力资源为主导的协同设计干预措施和结果,这些干预措施和结果集中在重新设计政策、实践和组织系统的神经分歧观点上。批判实用主义为参与式探究和制度转型提供了伦理和认识论基础,而STS则支持包容性实践的结构性整合。本文通过将人力资源重新定位为协作、递归和公正导向的组织变革的催化剂,为人力资源管理理论做出了贡献。对未来研究和实践的启示包括需要对神经包涵体进行参与性、跨背景和交叉研究,以及关注能够实现有意义的合作生产的人力资源系统的设计和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书