Rethinking flood resilience: systemic risk, governance failures, and the social production of vulnerability in the Himalayan-Indus region.

Abdur Rahim Hamidi, James D Ford, Paula Novo, Jouni Paavola, Ishfaq Hussain Malik
{"title":"Rethinking flood resilience: systemic risk, governance failures, and the social production of vulnerability in the Himalayan-Indus region.","authors":"Abdur Rahim Hamidi, James D Ford, Paula Novo, Jouni Paavola, Ishfaq Hussain Malik","doi":"10.1007/s44367-026-00032-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flood disasters in the Himalayan-Indus Basin are increasing in frequency, scale, and impact, driven by glacial melt, erratic monsoons, and changing land-use patterns. Yet their effects are unevenly distributed, and their causes extend beyond climatic or environmental factors. Using the 2022 Pakistan floods as a case study, this paper argues that such disasters are not isolated anomalies but emerge from the intersection of climate extremes, systemic risk, social vulnerability, and governance failure. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in disaster studies, hydropolitics, and critical development, this study employs a qualitative, exploratory research design, analysing published papers, technical and policy reports, and grey literature. A critical social science perspective frames the analysis, highlighting how historical and political processes-including colonial-era infrastructure, socio-political exclusion, and institutional dysfunction-have produced and distributed systemic flood risk in Pakistan. We argue that flood crises stem not only from climate extremes but are systemically produced by historical and political processes, shaped by intersecting hierarchies of social, economic, and political marginalization. The paper critiques dominant hazard-centric and technocratic responses and calls for reimagining resilience as a transformative process-one that involves overhauling governance, dismantling exclusion, rebuilding socio-ecological relations, and embedding equity and justice in disaster risk strategies. The paper advocates for just, participatory, and ecologically grounded approaches to resilience. While focused on Pakistan, the findings offer broader insights for understanding and addressing systemic flood risk across the Himalayan-Indus region and comparable climate-vulnerable contexts. The paper contributes to ongoing debates on disaster governance and resilience in climate-vulnerable regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":521120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of disaster science and management","volume":"2 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of disaster science and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44367-026-00032-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flood disasters in the Himalayan-Indus Basin are increasing in frequency, scale, and impact, driven by glacial melt, erratic monsoons, and changing land-use patterns. Yet their effects are unevenly distributed, and their causes extend beyond climatic or environmental factors. Using the 2022 Pakistan floods as a case study, this paper argues that such disasters are not isolated anomalies but emerge from the intersection of climate extremes, systemic risk, social vulnerability, and governance failure. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in disaster studies, hydropolitics, and critical development, this study employs a qualitative, exploratory research design, analysing published papers, technical and policy reports, and grey literature. A critical social science perspective frames the analysis, highlighting how historical and political processes-including colonial-era infrastructure, socio-political exclusion, and institutional dysfunction-have produced and distributed systemic flood risk in Pakistan. We argue that flood crises stem not only from climate extremes but are systemically produced by historical and political processes, shaped by intersecting hierarchies of social, economic, and political marginalization. The paper critiques dominant hazard-centric and technocratic responses and calls for reimagining resilience as a transformative process-one that involves overhauling governance, dismantling exclusion, rebuilding socio-ecological relations, and embedding equity and justice in disaster risk strategies. The paper advocates for just, participatory, and ecologically grounded approaches to resilience. While focused on Pakistan, the findings offer broader insights for understanding and addressing systemic flood risk across the Himalayan-Indus region and comparable climate-vulnerable contexts. The paper contributes to ongoing debates on disaster governance and resilience in climate-vulnerable regions.

重新思考洪水恢复力:喜马拉雅山-印度河地区的系统性风险、治理失败和脆弱性的社会生产。
在冰川融化、不稳定的季风和土地利用模式变化的驱动下,喜马拉雅-印度河流域的洪水灾害在频率、规模和影响上都在增加。然而,它们的影响分布不均,其原因超出了气候或环境因素。本文以2022年巴基斯坦洪灾为例,认为此类灾害并非孤立的异常现象,而是极端气候、系统性风险、社会脆弱性和治理失败等因素共同作用的结果。本研究借鉴了灾害研究、水文政治和关键发展领域的跨学科研究成果,采用定性的探索性研究设计,分析了已发表的论文、技术和政策报告以及灰色文献。批判性的社会科学视角构建了分析框架,强调历史和政治进程——包括殖民时代的基础设施、社会政治排斥和制度功能失调——如何在巴基斯坦产生和分配系统性洪水风险。我们认为,洪水危机不仅源于极端气候,而且是由历史和政治过程系统地产生的,由社会、经济和政治边缘化的交叉等级形成。本文批评了主流的以灾害为中心和技术官僚主义的应对措施,并呼吁将恢复力重新定义为一个变革过程——一个涉及彻底改革治理、消除排斥、重建社会生态关系以及在灾害风险战略中嵌入公平和正义的过程。本文提倡采用公正的、参与式的和基于生态的方法来处理复原力。虽然这些发现的重点是巴基斯坦,但它们为理解和解决喜马拉雅-印度河地区以及类似的气候脆弱地区的系统性洪水风险提供了更广泛的见解。这篇论文为正在进行的关于气候脆弱地区灾害治理和复原力的辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书