Artificial Intelligence in Human Participant Research: Ethical Risks and Institutional Policy Considerations.

IF 1.1
Melissa Singer Pressman
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Human Participant Research: Ethical Risks and Institutional Policy Considerations.","authors":"Melissa Singer Pressman","doi":"10.1177/15562646261437187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into research presents emerging ethical and governance challenges for institutions overseeing human research. While existing frameworks provide general protections, they offer limited guidance for addressing AI-specific risks related to informed consent, transparency, data privacy, and fairness. This commentary synthesizes key ethical concerns associated with AI-enabled research and examines some implications for institutional policy development and research ethics review. Rather than proposing a comprehensive evaluative framework, this invited commentary examines governance and procedural gaps that complicate implementation of existing AI oversight resources and emphasizes institution-level policy approaches to support consistent, responsible research ethics review. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate how the absence of clear policy guidance can create ambiguity in research ethics review and researcher practice. The ethical considerations discussed apply broadly to research ethics review systems internationally, including Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and Ethics Review Committees (ERCs).</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646261437187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into research presents emerging ethical and governance challenges for institutions overseeing human research. While existing frameworks provide general protections, they offer limited guidance for addressing AI-specific risks related to informed consent, transparency, data privacy, and fairness. This commentary synthesizes key ethical concerns associated with AI-enabled research and examines some implications for institutional policy development and research ethics review. Rather than proposing a comprehensive evaluative framework, this invited commentary examines governance and procedural gaps that complicate implementation of existing AI oversight resources and emphasizes institution-level policy approaches to support consistent, responsible research ethics review. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate how the absence of clear policy guidance can create ambiguity in research ethics review and researcher practice. The ethical considerations discussed apply broadly to research ethics review systems internationally, including Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and Ethics Review Committees (ERCs).

人类参与者研究中的人工智能:伦理风险和制度政策考虑。
人工智能(AI)与研究的快速融合给监督人类研究的机构带来了新的伦理和治理挑战。虽然现有框架提供了一般保护,但它们为解决与知情同意、透明度、数据隐私和公平性相关的人工智能特定风险提供了有限的指导。本评论综合了与人工智能研究相关的关键伦理问题,并探讨了对机构政策制定和研究伦理审查的一些影响。这篇特邀评论没有提出一个全面的评估框架,而是审查了治理和程序上的差距,这些差距使现有人工智能监督资源的实施复杂化,并强调了机构层面的政策方法,以支持一致的、负责任的研究伦理审查。提供了一个说明性的例子来说明缺乏明确的政策指导如何在研究伦理审查和研究人员实践中造成歧义。所讨论的伦理考虑广泛适用于国际上的研究伦理审查系统,包括机构审查委员会(irb)、研究伦理委员会(RECs)和伦理审查委员会(ERCs)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书