Recurrent Acute Tonsillitis: Re-evaluating Surgical Indications Through Long-Term Outcome Assessment.

Hannah Inez Houborg, Tejs Ehlers Klug
{"title":"Recurrent Acute Tonsillitis: Re-evaluating Surgical Indications Through Long-Term Outcome Assessment.","authors":"Hannah Inez Houborg, Tejs Ehlers Klug","doi":"10.1177/00034894261437481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether current tonsillectomy (TE) guidelines for adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis (RT) are too restrictive, potentially excluding patients who would benefit from surgery, and to explore predictive factors of improved postoperative Throat-Related Quality of Life (TR-QoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing TE were stratified into 3 groups based on increasingly stringent criteria: G1 (not meeting the Danish National Guidelines (DNG) or the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN]/Paradise criteria), G2 (meeting only DNG), and G3 (meeting both DNG and SIGN/Paradise criteria). The effects of TE were assessed using the Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory 14 (TOI-14) and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). TOI-14 scores, GBI scores, patient satisfaction and postoperative sore throat episodes were evaluated after 12, 24 and 36 months. Predictive factors of improved TR-QOL were identified using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 65 patients (G1: n = 21, G2: n = 33, G3: n = 11) were analyzed. Response rates ranged from 65% to 86% at follow-ups. All groups demonstrated significant, sustained improvements in TOI-14 and GBI scores. TOI-14 total scores improved from 45.0 at baseline to 8.1-10.2 at follow-ups, GBI total scores ranged from 34.9-40.1, satisfaction rates were high (96%-98%), and sore throat episodes were infrequent postoperatively. Group differences were minimal. The preoperative TOI-14 score was the strongest predictor of improved TR-QOL (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.723).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TE provided sustained benefits and significantly improved TR-QoL across a broad range of RT patients, including those who did not meet current guideline criteria, suggesting that guidelines may be too restrictive. The preoperative TOI-14 score was the strongest predictor of TR-QoL improvement. Integrating such a patient-centered tool to select patients for TE may enhance RT patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"673-685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894261437481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether current tonsillectomy (TE) guidelines for adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis (RT) are too restrictive, potentially excluding patients who would benefit from surgery, and to explore predictive factors of improved postoperative Throat-Related Quality of Life (TR-QoL).

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing TE were stratified into 3 groups based on increasingly stringent criteria: G1 (not meeting the Danish National Guidelines (DNG) or the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN]/Paradise criteria), G2 (meeting only DNG), and G3 (meeting both DNG and SIGN/Paradise criteria). The effects of TE were assessed using the Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory 14 (TOI-14) and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). TOI-14 scores, GBI scores, patient satisfaction and postoperative sore throat episodes were evaluated after 12, 24 and 36 months. Predictive factors of improved TR-QOL were identified using multiple linear regression.

Results: At baseline, 65 patients (G1: n = 21, G2: n = 33, G3: n = 11) were analyzed. Response rates ranged from 65% to 86% at follow-ups. All groups demonstrated significant, sustained improvements in TOI-14 and GBI scores. TOI-14 total scores improved from 45.0 at baseline to 8.1-10.2 at follow-ups, GBI total scores ranged from 34.9-40.1, satisfaction rates were high (96%-98%), and sore throat episodes were infrequent postoperatively. Group differences were minimal. The preoperative TOI-14 score was the strongest predictor of improved TR-QOL (adjusted R2 = 0.723).

Conclusions: TE provided sustained benefits and significantly improved TR-QoL across a broad range of RT patients, including those who did not meet current guideline criteria, suggesting that guidelines may be too restrictive. The preoperative TOI-14 score was the strongest predictor of TR-QoL improvement. Integrating such a patient-centered tool to select patients for TE may enhance RT patient management.

复发性急性扁桃体炎:通过长期预后评估重新评估手术指征。
目的:探讨目前针对复发性急性扁桃体炎(RT)的成人扁桃体切除术(TE)指南是否过于严格,可能会排除可能从手术中获益的患者,并探讨术后喉咙相关生活质量(TR-QoL)改善的预测因素。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,接受TE治疗的患者根据越来越严格的标准分为3组:G1(不符合丹麦国家指南(DNG)或苏格兰校际指南网络[SIGN]/Paradise标准),G2(仅符合DNG), G3(同时符合DNG和SIGN/Paradise标准)。使用扁桃体切除术结局量表14 (TOI-14)和格拉斯哥获益量表(GBI)评估TE的效果。12、24和36个月后分别评估TOI-14评分、GBI评分、患者满意度和术后喉咙痛发作情况。采用多元线性回归确定改善TR-QOL的预测因素。结果:在基线时,共分析65例患者(G1: n = 21, G2: n = 33, G3: n = 11)。回复率从65%到86%不等。所有组在TOI-14和GBI评分上都表现出显著的、持续的改善。TOI-14总分从基线时的45.0分提高到随访时的8.1-10.2分,GBI总分为34.9-40.1分,满意率高(96%-98%),术后喉咙痛发作较少。组间差异很小。术前TOI-14评分是改善TR-QOL的最强预测因子(校正R2 = 0.723)。结论:TE在广泛的RT患者中提供了持续的益处并显著改善了TR-QoL,包括那些不符合现行指南标准的患者,这表明指南可能过于严格。术前TOI-14评分是TR-QoL改善的最强预测因子。整合这样一个以患者为中心的工具来选择TE患者可能会提高RT患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书