Analysis of inter-brain synchrony in group-based electroencephalography to assess task-dependent interactions.

IF 3.1 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Frontiers in neuroergonomics Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnrgo.2026.1774423
Alex Kennedy, Nathan Shields, Sean Farrell, Alejandro Lopez Valdes
{"title":"Analysis of inter-brain synchrony in group-based electroencephalography to assess task-dependent interactions.","authors":"Alex Kennedy, Nathan Shields, Sean Farrell, Alejandro Lopez Valdes","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2026.1774423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social interaction and cooperative behavior are inherent and important aspects of daily life. Neuroscience research has demonstrated that neural activity synchronizes during cooperative group behavior. Hyperscanning, a method of simultaneously recording neural activity from two or more subjects, allows insight into the underpinnings of neural dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involves a triadic 24-channel EEG hyperscanning experiment, using a cooperative card game to elicit group interaction and cognitive puzzle games as individual control tasks. The study was split into two separate experiments. Experiment One, where two groups repeatedly performed experimental blocks and Experiment Two where 10 individual groups participated in one block, where an adversary was randomly introduced to determine if negative social behavior changed neural synchrony. After removing artefactual contributions of muscle and eyeblink components and task duration discrepancies that may affect the group's synchrony, the neural correlation between subjects was examined via Inter-Subject Correlation (ISC). Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the magnitude of differences in ISC, unadjusted, and adjusted trial-duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Similar neural synchrony levels were observed in the group members in Experiment One (unadjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.286 ± 0.013, individual ISC = 0.267 ± 0.02, baseline ISC = 0.219 ± 0.008, duration-adjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.225 ± 0.015, individual ISC = 0.278 ± 0.017, baseline ISC = 0.23 ± 0.007) and Experiment Two (unadjusted and duration-adjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.186 ± 0.009, individual ISC = 0.177 ± 0.01, baseline ISC = 0.157 ± 0.005).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While no statistically significant differences were found between cooperative and non-cooperative tasks, task-based synchrony was higher than resting state synchrony. Furthermore, significantly higher brain synchrony was observed in cooperative tasks when there were no adversaries present in the group. This study highlights the importance of analysis parameters like the analysis time window and task contrasts avoiding similarities in cognitive demands when evaluating brain synchronization in naturalistic environments for group-based interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":517413,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","volume":"7 ","pages":"1774423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2026.1774423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social interaction and cooperative behavior are inherent and important aspects of daily life. Neuroscience research has demonstrated that neural activity synchronizes during cooperative group behavior. Hyperscanning, a method of simultaneously recording neural activity from two or more subjects, allows insight into the underpinnings of neural dynamics.

Methods: This study involves a triadic 24-channel EEG hyperscanning experiment, using a cooperative card game to elicit group interaction and cognitive puzzle games as individual control tasks. The study was split into two separate experiments. Experiment One, where two groups repeatedly performed experimental blocks and Experiment Two where 10 individual groups participated in one block, where an adversary was randomly introduced to determine if negative social behavior changed neural synchrony. After removing artefactual contributions of muscle and eyeblink components and task duration discrepancies that may affect the group's synchrony, the neural correlation between subjects was examined via Inter-Subject Correlation (ISC). Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the magnitude of differences in ISC, unadjusted, and adjusted trial-duration.

Results: Similar neural synchrony levels were observed in the group members in Experiment One (unadjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.286 ± 0.013, individual ISC = 0.267 ± 0.02, baseline ISC = 0.219 ± 0.008, duration-adjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.225 ± 0.015, individual ISC = 0.278 ± 0.017, baseline ISC = 0.23 ± 0.007) and Experiment Two (unadjusted and duration-adjusted: cooperative ISC = 0.186 ± 0.009, individual ISC = 0.177 ± 0.01, baseline ISC = 0.157 ± 0.005).

Discussion: While no statistically significant differences were found between cooperative and non-cooperative tasks, task-based synchrony was higher than resting state synchrony. Furthermore, significantly higher brain synchrony was observed in cooperative tasks when there were no adversaries present in the group. This study highlights the importance of analysis parameters like the analysis time window and task contrasts avoiding similarities in cognitive demands when evaluating brain synchronization in naturalistic environments for group-based interactions.

基于群体的脑电图评估任务依赖相互作用的脑间同步分析。
社会互动和合作行为是日常生活中固有的重要方面。神经科学研究表明,在合作群体行为中,神经活动是同步的。超扫描是一种同时记录两个或多个受试者的神经活动的方法,可以深入了解神经动力学的基础。方法:采用三合一24通道脑电图超扫描实验,以合作纸牌游戏诱导群体互动,认知益智游戏作为个体控制任务。这项研究分为两个独立的实验。实验一,两组重复进行实验块实验二,10组单独参与一个块,随机引入一个对手来确定消极的社会行为是否会改变神经同步性。在去除肌肉和眨眼成分的人为贡献以及可能影响组同步的任务持续时间差异后,通过主体间相关性(ISC)检查受试者之间的神经相关性。使用线性混合效应模型来评估ISC、未调整和调整的试验持续时间的差异程度。结果:实验一(未调整:合作ISC = 0.286±0.013,个体ISC = 0.267±0.02,基线ISC = 0.219±0.008,持续时间调整:合作ISC = 0.225±0.015,个体ISC = 0.278±0.017,基线ISC = 0.23±0.007)和实验二(未调整和持续时间调整:合作ISC = 0.186±0.009,个体ISC = 0.177±0.01,基线ISC = 0.157±0.005)各组成员的神经同动性水平相似。讨论:虽然在合作任务和非合作任务之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但基于任务的同步性高于静息状态的同步性。此外,当小组中没有对手时,在合作任务中观察到明显更高的大脑同步性。本研究强调了分析参数的重要性,如分析时间窗口和任务对比,避免了在评估基于群体互动的自然环境中大脑同步时认知需求的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书