Perspectives of OB-GYN Residents and Faculty on Resident Simulation Curricula: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Monet Lane, Morgan Briggs, Christine Pando, Susan Duyar-Ayerdi, Kristina Kaljo, Kathryn Dielentheis
{"title":"Perspectives of OB-GYN Residents and Faculty on Resident Simulation Curricula: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Monet Lane, Morgan Briggs, Christine Pando, Susan Duyar-Ayerdi, Kristina Kaljo, Kathryn Dielentheis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation training facilitates skill development in low-risk environments and is increasingly widespread in residency programs. Recent simulation models have been developed for obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN). Simulation curricula can include a wide range of training methods. To optimize the effectiveness and acceptability of simulation curriculum, key stakeholders' (ie, residents and faculty) perspectives should be obtained before implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used convergent-parallel mixed methods. Electronic surveys were completed by 19 of 32 OB-GYN residents (59%) and 18 of 53 OB-GYN faculty (34%). Two focus groups were conducted, one with residents (n = 12/32, 38%) and one with faculty (n = 6/53, 11%). Focus group transcripts were inductively coded independently and then collaboratively by 3 coders. Codes were categorically analyzed to elicit themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus group themes included (1) important simulation topics and content, (2) optimal timing of simulation activities, (3) ideal simulation curriculum structure, (4) barriers to education, (5) factors that shape participants' perspectives, and (6) using simulation to improve resident education. Survey responses supported these themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study elucidates resident and faculty perspectives on simulation training. Both groups endorsed key ideas, including the need for a structured and standardized curriculum. Currently, no simulation curriculum standards exist. Findings demonstrate the importance of communication between residents and faculty to create an effective training curriculum that addresses the unique needs and barriers of both trainers and trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"125 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation training facilitates skill development in low-risk environments and is increasingly widespread in residency programs. Recent simulation models have been developed for obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN). Simulation curricula can include a wide range of training methods. To optimize the effectiveness and acceptability of simulation curriculum, key stakeholders' (ie, residents and faculty) perspectives should be obtained before implementation.

Methods: This study used convergent-parallel mixed methods. Electronic surveys were completed by 19 of 32 OB-GYN residents (59%) and 18 of 53 OB-GYN faculty (34%). Two focus groups were conducted, one with residents (n = 12/32, 38%) and one with faculty (n = 6/53, 11%). Focus group transcripts were inductively coded independently and then collaboratively by 3 coders. Codes were categorically analyzed to elicit themes.

Results: Focus group themes included (1) important simulation topics and content, (2) optimal timing of simulation activities, (3) ideal simulation curriculum structure, (4) barriers to education, (5) factors that shape participants' perspectives, and (6) using simulation to improve resident education. Survey responses supported these themes.

Conclusions: This study elucidates resident and faculty perspectives on simulation training. Both groups endorsed key ideas, including the need for a structured and standardized curriculum. Currently, no simulation curriculum standards exist. Findings demonstrate the importance of communication between residents and faculty to create an effective training curriculum that addresses the unique needs and barriers of both trainers and trainees.

妇产科住院医师和教师对住院医师模拟课程的看法:一项混合方法研究。
简介:模拟训练有助于低风险环境中的技能发展,并且在住院医师计划中越来越普遍。最近的模拟模型已经开发用于妇产科(OB-GYN)。模拟课程可以包括各种各样的训练方法。为了优化模拟课程的有效性和可接受性,在实施之前应该获得关键利益相关者(即住院医生和教师)的观点。方法:本研究采用收敛-平行混合方法。32名妇产科住院医师中的19名(59%)和53名妇产科教师中的18名(34%)完成了电子调查。进行了两个焦点小组,一个是住院医师(n = 12/32, 38%),一个是教师(n = 6/53, 11%)。焦点小组转录本分别由3名编码员独立进行归纳编码,然后协同编码。对代码进行分类分析以引出主题。结果:焦点小组主题包括(1)重要的模拟主题和内容,(2)模拟活动的最佳时机,(3)理想的模拟课程结构,(4)教育障碍,(5)塑造参与者观点的因素,以及(6)利用模拟改善居民教育。调查答复支持这些主题。结论:本研究阐明了住院医师和教师对模拟训练的看法。这两个团体都赞同一些关键观点,包括需要一个结构化和标准化的课程。目前还没有模拟课程标准。研究结果表明,住院医师和教师之间的沟通对于创建有效的培训课程,解决培训师和学员的独特需求和障碍的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书