Rethinking delivery routes: oral administration of plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles reduces the toxicity of intravenous injection.

IF 8.5
Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.20517/evcna.2025.164
Li Chen, Bo Xiao
{"title":"Rethinking delivery routes: oral administration of plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles reduces the toxicity of intravenous injection.","authors":"Li Chen, Bo Xiao","doi":"10.20517/evcna.2025.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles (PELNs), as an emerging \"green\" nanoplatform, exhibit broad pharmacological activities, low immunogenicity, and inherent advantages as natural drug carriers. They show great potential in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and health supplement sectors. The clinical application of PELNs is heavily contingent on their safety profile, which is intricately linked to the administration route. This opinion compares the safety implications of the two primary routes: oral administration versus intravenous injection. Current evidence indicates that intravenous administration of PELNs triggers complement activation, immune responses, and hepatorenal toxicity; even surface engineering modifications cannot completely eliminate these risks. In contrast, oral administration of PELNs may achieve superior safety by leveraging the gastrointestinal tract's ability to effectively reduce the immunogenic components. Based on these findings, we advocate for the prioritization of oral delivery in the future development of PELNs, given its superior safety profile for realizing their potential as natural therapeutics and drug delivery systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":520322,"journal":{"name":"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids","volume":"7 1","pages":"441-447"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13074265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2025.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles (PELNs), as an emerging "green" nanoplatform, exhibit broad pharmacological activities, low immunogenicity, and inherent advantages as natural drug carriers. They show great potential in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and health supplement sectors. The clinical application of PELNs is heavily contingent on their safety profile, which is intricately linked to the administration route. This opinion compares the safety implications of the two primary routes: oral administration versus intravenous injection. Current evidence indicates that intravenous administration of PELNs triggers complement activation, immune responses, and hepatorenal toxicity; even surface engineering modifications cannot completely eliminate these risks. In contrast, oral administration of PELNs may achieve superior safety by leveraging the gastrointestinal tract's ability to effectively reduce the immunogenic components. Based on these findings, we advocate for the prioritization of oral delivery in the future development of PELNs, given its superior safety profile for realizing their potential as natural therapeutics and drug delivery systems.

重新思考给药途径:口服植物来源的外泌体样纳米囊泡减少静脉注射的毒性。
植物源性外泌体样纳米囊泡(PELNs)作为一种新兴的“绿色”纳米平台,具有广泛的药理活性、低免疫原性和作为天然药物载体的固有优势。它们在制药、化妆品和保健品领域显示出巨大的潜力。peln的临床应用在很大程度上取决于它们的安全性,这与给药途径密切相关。本意见比较了两种主要途径的安全性影响:口服给药与静脉注射。目前的证据表明,静脉注射PELNs可触发补体激活、免疫反应和肝肾毒性;即使是地面工程改造也不能完全消除这些风险。相比之下,口服peln可能通过利用胃肠道有效减少免疫原性成分的能力而获得更高的安全性。基于这些发现,我们主张在未来的peln开发中优先考虑口服给药,因为口服给药具有优越的安全性,可以实现其作为自然疗法和药物给药系统的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书