Immediate Loading on Tapered Versus Straight Multiple Implants: A 3-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 4
Young Woo Song, Seung-Hyun Park, Franz J Strauss, Sung Jin Yoo, Jin-Young Park, Jae-Kook Cha, Ui-Won Jung
{"title":"Immediate Loading on Tapered Versus Straight Multiple Implants: A 3-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Young Woo Song, Seung-Hyun Park, Franz J Strauss, Sung Jin Yoo, Jin-Young Park, Jae-Kook Cha, Ui-Won Jung","doi":"10.1111/cid.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at 3 years following immediate loading of tapered implants (TI) versus straight implants (SI) from a randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of the 41 patients who received 93 implants in the original RCT (TI group: 23 patients, 50 implants; SI group: 18 patients, 43 implants), those who completed 3-year follow-up were included in this analysis. Implant survival and success rates, as well as changes in marginal bone loss (MBL), were assessed and compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards models, and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients with 61 implants were evaluated (TI group: 15 patients, 32 implants; SI group: 13 patients, 29 implants). At 3 years post-immediate loading, cumulative survival rates at the patient level were 95.8% for the TI group and 78.3% for the SI group (intergroup p = 0.109). At the implant level, survival rates were 96.2% for TI and 90.0% for SI (intergroup p = 0.351). All implant failures occurred within the first year (1 implant in TI; 5 implants in SI), and no further losses were recorded thereafter. However, two TI implants in a single patient exhibited progressive peri-implantitis during follow-up. Mean MBL values were 0.61 ± 1.70 mm for the TI group and 0.53 ± 0.53 mm for the SI group, with no statistically significant differences between groups (intergroup p = 0.428).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It could be cautiously concluded that the TI rather than the SI might be a more predictable option in terms of achieving an optimized initial stability for immediate loading in the posterior region. Once osseointegration was successfully achieved, however, the macro-design of the implant might not have an influence on the clinical and radiographic outcomes including the osseointegrated state during the 3 years of observational period.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>KCT0002489; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&focus=reset_12&search_page=L&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=19032&status=5&seq_group=8332.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":"28 2","pages":"e70147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13080229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at 3 years following immediate loading of tapered implants (TI) versus straight implants (SI) from a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Materials and methods: Of the 41 patients who received 93 implants in the original RCT (TI group: 23 patients, 50 implants; SI group: 18 patients, 43 implants), those who completed 3-year follow-up were included in this analysis. Implant survival and success rates, as well as changes in marginal bone loss (MBL), were assessed and compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards models, and linear mixed-effects models.

Results: A total of 28 patients with 61 implants were evaluated (TI group: 15 patients, 32 implants; SI group: 13 patients, 29 implants). At 3 years post-immediate loading, cumulative survival rates at the patient level were 95.8% for the TI group and 78.3% for the SI group (intergroup p = 0.109). At the implant level, survival rates were 96.2% for TI and 90.0% for SI (intergroup p = 0.351). All implant failures occurred within the first year (1 implant in TI; 5 implants in SI), and no further losses were recorded thereafter. However, two TI implants in a single patient exhibited progressive peri-implantitis during follow-up. Mean MBL values were 0.61 ± 1.70 mm for the TI group and 0.53 ± 0.53 mm for the SI group, with no statistically significant differences between groups (intergroup p = 0.428).

Conclusion: It could be cautiously concluded that the TI rather than the SI might be a more predictable option in terms of achieving an optimized initial stability for immediate loading in the posterior region. Once osseointegration was successfully achieved, however, the macro-design of the implant might not have an influence on the clinical and radiographic outcomes including the osseointegrated state during the 3 years of observational period.

Trail registration: KCT0002489; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&focus=reset_12&search_page=L&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=19032&status=5&seq_group=8332.

锥形与直型多种植体即刻负荷:一项3年随访的随机临床试验。
目的:从一项随机对照试验(RCT)中评估锥形种植体(TI)与直种植体(SI)即刻加载后3年的临床和影像学结果。材料和方法:在原始RCT中接受93个种植体的41例患者中(TI组:23例,50个种植体;SI组:18例,43个种植体),完成3年随访的患者纳入本分析。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线、Cox比例风险模型和线性混合效应模型评估和比较种植体存活率和成功率以及边际骨质流失(MBL)的变化。结果:共评估28例患者61个种植体(TI组15例,32个种植体;SI组13例,29个种植体)。即刻加载后3年,TI组的累积生存率为95.8%,SI组为78.3%(组间p = 0.109)。在种植体水平上,TI和SI的存活率分别为96.2%和90.0%(组间p = 0.351)。所有的植入失败都发生在第一年(1个植入TI, 5个植入SI),此后没有进一步的损失记录。然而,在随访期间,单个患者的两个TI植入物表现出进行性植入物周围炎。TI组平均MBL为0.61±1.70 mm, SI组平均MBL为0.53±0.53 mm,组间差异无统计学意义(组间p = 0.428)。结论:可以谨慎地得出结论,在获得最佳的初始稳定性以立即在后区加载方面,TI比SI可能是一个更可预测的选择。然而,一旦成功实现骨整合,种植体的宏观设计可能不会影响临床和影像学结果,包括3年观察期间的骨整合状态。试验注册:KCT0002489;https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&focus=reset_12&search_page=L&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=19032&status=5&seq_group=8332。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书