Thymectomy or partial thymectomy, that is the question: surgical considerations for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review.

Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) Pub Date : 2026-03-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.21037/med-2025-1-47
Koichi Fukumoto, Reo Kondo, Madoka Goto, Shoji Okado, Yasuhisa Ichikawa, Mika Uchiyama, Shoichi Mori
{"title":"Thymectomy or partial thymectomy, that is the question: surgical considerations for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review.","authors":"Koichi Fukumoto, Reo Kondo, Madoka Goto, Shoji Okado, Yasuhisa Ichikawa, Mika Uchiyama, Shoichi Mori","doi":"10.21037/med-2025-1-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and other international guidelines, thymectomy is the standard surgical procedure for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. Recent evidence suggests that partial thymectomy, which preserves part of the thymus, may achieve outcomes comparable to thymectomy in the short- and long-term. This review aims to compare perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes between complete and partial thymectomy in early-stage TETs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PubMed search for English-language studies published from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2025 that reported perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with early-stage TETs who underwent either thymectomy or partial thymectomy.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Initial single-institution retrospective studies with limited cases were followed by larger multicenter investigations, national database analyses, and two meta-analyses. Partial thymectomy was frequently associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and, in some studies, lower complication rates. Short-term survival outcomes were generally similar between the two procedures. Recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were broadly comparable, although some studies indicated slightly better OS with thymectomy in certain subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the currently available retrospective evidence, partial thymectomy may be feasible in carefully selected patients with early-stage thymoma; however, the lack of prospective data precludes definitive conclusions regarding oncologic equivalence. Most existing evidence is based on open approaches, particularly median sternotomy. Whether these findings extend to minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or robot-assisted thoracic surgery remains uncertain. Long-term data beyond 5 years are limited, and evidence regarding thymic malignancies other than thymoma is sparse. Further contemporary studies, particularly of minimally invasive approaches, are needed to clarify the relative benefits of partial thymectomy versus thymectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74139,"journal":{"name":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","volume":"10 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/med-2025-1-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and other international guidelines, thymectomy is the standard surgical procedure for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. Recent evidence suggests that partial thymectomy, which preserves part of the thymus, may achieve outcomes comparable to thymectomy in the short- and long-term. This review aims to compare perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes between complete and partial thymectomy in early-stage TETs.

Methods: We conducted a PubMed search for English-language studies published from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2025 that reported perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with early-stage TETs who underwent either thymectomy or partial thymectomy.

Key content and findings: Initial single-institution retrospective studies with limited cases were followed by larger multicenter investigations, national database analyses, and two meta-analyses. Partial thymectomy was frequently associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and, in some studies, lower complication rates. Short-term survival outcomes were generally similar between the two procedures. Recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were broadly comparable, although some studies indicated slightly better OS with thymectomy in certain subgroups.

Conclusions: Based on the currently available retrospective evidence, partial thymectomy may be feasible in carefully selected patients with early-stage thymoma; however, the lack of prospective data precludes definitive conclusions regarding oncologic equivalence. Most existing evidence is based on open approaches, particularly median sternotomy. Whether these findings extend to minimally invasive techniques such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or robot-assisted thoracic surgery remains uncertain. Long-term data beyond 5 years are limited, and evidence regarding thymic malignancies other than thymoma is sparse. Further contemporary studies, particularly of minimally invasive approaches, are needed to clarify the relative benefits of partial thymectomy versus thymectomy.

胸腺切除术或部分胸腺切除术,这是一个问题:早期胸腺上皮肿瘤的手术考虑:叙述回顾。
背景和目的:根据国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)和其他国际指南,胸腺切除术是早期胸腺上皮肿瘤(TETs)的标准手术方法。然而,最佳切除范围仍有争议。最近的证据表明,保留部分胸腺的部分胸腺切除术在短期和长期可能达到与胸腺切除术相当的结果。本综述旨在比较早期胸腺癌完全切除和部分切除的围手术期和长期肿瘤预后。方法:我们对发表于1980年1月1日至2025年7月31日的英文研究进行了PubMed检索,这些研究报告了接受胸腺切除术或部分胸腺切除术的早期tet患者的围手术期和长期预后。主要内容和发现:最初的单机构回顾性研究,有限的病例,随后是更大的多中心调查,国家数据库分析和两个荟萃分析。部分胸腺切除术通常与较短的手术时间、较少的出血量以及在一些研究中较低的并发症发生率相关。两种手术的短期生存结果大致相似。复发率、无病生存率和总生存率(OS)大致相当,尽管一些研究表明在某些亚组中胸腺切除术的OS稍好。结论:根据现有的回顾性证据,部分胸腺切除术对于精心挑选的早期胸腺瘤患者是可行的;然而,缺乏前瞻性数据妨碍了关于肿瘤等效性的明确结论。大多数现有证据是基于开放入路,特别是正中胸骨切开术。这些发现是否延伸到微创技术,如视频辅助胸腔镜手术或机器人辅助胸外科手术仍不确定。超过5年的长期数据有限,除胸腺瘤以外的胸腺恶性肿瘤的证据很少。需要进一步的当代研究,特别是微创入路,来阐明部分胸腺切除术与胸腺切除术的相对优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书