Determining Ethical Incentives in Biomedical HIV Research: Insights from Researchers, Regulators, and People Living with HIV.

IF 1.1
Karah Y Greene, Brandon Brown, Jerome T Galea, Jasmine L Lopez, Karine Dubé, Jeff Taylor, Christopher Christensen, Andrea N Polonijo
{"title":"Determining Ethical Incentives in Biomedical HIV Research: Insights from Researchers, Regulators, and People Living with HIV.","authors":"Karah Y Greene, Brandon Brown, Jerome T Galea, Jasmine L Lopez, Karine Dubé, Jeff Taylor, Christopher Christensen, Andrea N Polonijo","doi":"10.1177/15562646261441345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incentives are crucial for recruiting and retaining participants in research studies, yet researchers and regulators often struggle to determine appropriate incentives due to ethical concerns and a lack of clear guidelines. We conducted interviews and focus groups with three stakeholder groups-biomedical HIV researchers (n = 12), institutional review board (IRB) members (n = 12), and people living with HIV (PLWH) (n = 69)-to explore their perspectives on incentives and ethical decision-making in biomedical HIV research. Our findings revealed disparities in perspectives; researchers and IRB members were most concerned about offering high incentives, while PLWH were most concerned about incentives being too low. Consensus highlighted the need for diverse incentive options, transparency, standardized guidelines, and community engagement to address both ethical and practical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"210-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13250273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646261441345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incentives are crucial for recruiting and retaining participants in research studies, yet researchers and regulators often struggle to determine appropriate incentives due to ethical concerns and a lack of clear guidelines. We conducted interviews and focus groups with three stakeholder groups-biomedical HIV researchers (n = 12), institutional review board (IRB) members (n = 12), and people living with HIV (PLWH) (n = 69)-to explore their perspectives on incentives and ethical decision-making in biomedical HIV research. Our findings revealed disparities in perspectives; researchers and IRB members were most concerned about offering high incentives, while PLWH were most concerned about incentives being too low. Consensus highlighted the need for diverse incentive options, transparency, standardized guidelines, and community engagement to address both ethical and practical challenges.

确定生物医学HIV研究中的伦理激励:来自研究人员、监管机构和HIV感染者的见解。
激励对于招募和留住研究参与者至关重要,然而由于伦理问题和缺乏明确的指导方针,研究人员和监管机构常常难以确定适当的激励措施。我们对三个利益相关者群体——生物医学HIV研究人员(n = 12)、机构审查委员会(IRB)成员(n = 12)和艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH) (n = 69)——进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论,以探讨他们对生物医学HIV研究中的激励和伦理决策的看法。我们的发现揭示了观点上的差异;研究人员和IRB成员最关心的是提供高激励,而PLWH最关心的是激励过低。共识强调需要多样化的激励方案、透明度、标准化的指导方针和社区参与,以应对道德和实际挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书