Framing Primary Care Clinicians' Experiences Managing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Insights From an Educational Intervention.

Tammi Albrecht, Tamara J LeCaire, Molly Schroeder, Jonathan Stone, Uriel Paniagua, Sylvia Peng, Jennifer Landeta Vidal, Stephanie Houston, Sarina Schrager, Cynthia M Carlsson, Art Walaszek
{"title":"Framing Primary Care Clinicians' Experiences Managing Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: Insights From an Educational Intervention.","authors":"Tammi Albrecht, Tamara J LeCaire, Molly Schroeder, Jonathan Stone, Uriel Paniagua, Sylvia Peng, Jennifer Landeta Vidal, Stephanie Houston, Sarina Schrager, Cynthia M Carlsson, Art Walaszek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Approximately 90% of persons with dementia experience behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Primary care clinicians often are the main health care professionals managing the care of persons with dementia who exhibit BPSD, yet many lack training and resources needed for management. DETAILD (Dementia Educational Techniques: Academic detaILing and DICE) is an educational intervention designed to enhance clinicians' knowledge, confidence, and implementation of evidence-based practices for recognizing and managing BPSD.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify clinician-level factors that influence the reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of the DETAILD intervention in supporting primary care clinicians in managing BPSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 clinicians. A framework-guided analysis was used to identify knowledge and practice gaps in BPSD management and factors that affect engagement with the DETAILD program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinicians identified gaps in knowledge and self-efficacy related to recognizing and managing BPSD, particularly in applying nonpharmacologic strategies and care planning. Eleven themes emerged that influenced DETAILD's reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness, including the need for personalized care approaches, team-wide buy-in, applied learning methods, and training logistics. Clinicians emphasized the benefits of case-based learning and the need for flexible formats and foundational knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight significant gaps in knowledge, confidence, and resources related to BPSD management among primary care clinicians. Identified barriers and facilitators informed adaptations to the DETAILD intervention aimed at enhancing clinician engagement, supporting practice change, and ultimately improving dementia care within primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"125 1","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 90% of persons with dementia experience behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Primary care clinicians often are the main health care professionals managing the care of persons with dementia who exhibit BPSD, yet many lack training and resources needed for management. DETAILD (Dementia Educational Techniques: Academic detaILing and DICE) is an educational intervention designed to enhance clinicians' knowledge, confidence, and implementation of evidence-based practices for recognizing and managing BPSD.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify clinician-level factors that influence the reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of the DETAILD intervention in supporting primary care clinicians in managing BPSD.

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 clinicians. A framework-guided analysis was used to identify knowledge and practice gaps in BPSD management and factors that affect engagement with the DETAILD program.

Results: Clinicians identified gaps in knowledge and self-efficacy related to recognizing and managing BPSD, particularly in applying nonpharmacologic strategies and care planning. Eleven themes emerged that influenced DETAILD's reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness, including the need for personalized care approaches, team-wide buy-in, applied learning methods, and training logistics. Clinicians emphasized the benefits of case-based learning and the need for flexible formats and foundational knowledge.

Conclusions: Findings highlight significant gaps in knowledge, confidence, and resources related to BPSD management among primary care clinicians. Identified barriers and facilitators informed adaptations to the DETAILD intervention aimed at enhancing clinician engagement, supporting practice change, and ultimately improving dementia care within primary care settings.

框架初级保健临床医生管理痴呆行为和心理症状的经验:来自教育干预的见解。
导读:大约90%的痴呆症患者会出现痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。初级保健临床医生通常是主要的卫生保健专业人员,负责管理表现为BPSD的痴呆症患者的护理,但许多人缺乏管理所需的培训和资源。detail(痴呆教育技术:学术细节和DICE)是一种教育干预,旨在提高临床医生的知识,信心和实施基于证据的实践,以识别和管理BPSD。目的:本研究旨在确定影响DETAILD干预的范围、采用、实施和有效性的临床层面因素,以支持初级保健临床医生管理BPSD。方法:对14名临床医生进行半结构化定性访谈。框架导向分析用于确定BPSD管理中的知识和实践差距以及影响参与DETAILD计划的因素。结果:临床医生发现了与认知和管理BPSD相关的知识和自我效能的差距,特别是在应用非药物策略和护理计划方面。11个主题影响了DETAILD的范围、采用、实施和有效性,包括个性化护理方法的需求、团队范围的支持、应用学习方法和培训后勤。临床医生强调了基于案例的学习的好处,以及对灵活格式和基础知识的需求。结论:研究结果突出了初级保健临床医生在BPSD管理方面的知识、信心和资源方面的显著差距。确定的障碍和促进因素为适应detail干预措施提供了信息,旨在加强临床医生的参与,支持实践变革,并最终改善初级保健机构中的痴呆症护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书