Evaluating the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project in Hong Kong: a longitudinal mixed methods study from the perspective of service providers.

IF 3.3
Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Dorothy Yingxuan Wang, Nelson Chun-Yiu Yeung, Phoenix Kit-Han Mo, Per Nilsen, Carol Ka-Po Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh
{"title":"Evaluating the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project in Hong Kong: a longitudinal mixed methods study from the perspective of service providers.","authors":"Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Dorothy Yingxuan Wang, Nelson Chun-Yiu Yeung, Phoenix Kit-Han Mo, Per Nilsen, Carol Ka-Po Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh","doi":"10.1186/s43058-026-00920-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intergenerational programmes improve older adults' cognitive, emotional, social, and health outcomes. However, their long-term sustainability remains unclear, which is important for ongoing effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project and the underlying facilitators and barriers from service providers' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A longitudinal, mixed-methods approach was applied. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT), consisting of eight domains, was used to assess the project's sustainability capacity, which is the ability of a programme to maintain its operations, benefits and impacts over time. Barriers and facilitators in PSAT domains were determined by the mean value of each domain. Semi-structured interviews were further administered to identify implementation determinants. A total of 28 managerial and front-line staff responsible for the programme were recruited from three local non-profit organisations. They completed baseline and three rounds PSAT survey and three focus-group interviews across the three-year project. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were conducted for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sustainability scores during the three-year implementation of the programme were 5.16 ± 0.65 in baseline, 5.66 ± 0.54 in Year 1, 5.62 ± 0.67 in Year 2, and 5.18 ± 0.48 in Year 3. Domains as consistent facilitators across the three-year implementation were organisational capacity and programme evaluation, while domains as consistent barriers were partnerships and strategic planning. Environmental support, funding stability, programme adaptation, and communications were found as mixed impacts during three years of implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Service providers perceived the overall sustainability of the community-based intergenerational programme as acceptable. Fluctuations in sustainability reflected the life cycle of the programme. Factors affecting the long-term implementation are common practical issues for community-based programme and need to be addressed, especially in the aspects of funding stability, partnerships, and strategic planning, as well as those specific to intergenerational relationship and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00920-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Intergenerational programmes improve older adults' cognitive, emotional, social, and health outcomes. However, their long-term sustainability remains unclear, which is important for ongoing effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project and the underlying facilitators and barriers from service providers' perspectives.

Research design and methods: A longitudinal, mixed-methods approach was applied. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT), consisting of eight domains, was used to assess the project's sustainability capacity, which is the ability of a programme to maintain its operations, benefits and impacts over time. Barriers and facilitators in PSAT domains were determined by the mean value of each domain. Semi-structured interviews were further administered to identify implementation determinants. A total of 28 managerial and front-line staff responsible for the programme were recruited from three local non-profit organisations. They completed baseline and three rounds PSAT survey and three focus-group interviews across the three-year project. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were conducted for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively.

Results: The total sustainability scores during the three-year implementation of the programme were 5.16 ± 0.65 in baseline, 5.66 ± 0.54 in Year 1, 5.62 ± 0.67 in Year 2, and 5.18 ± 0.48 in Year 3. Domains as consistent facilitators across the three-year implementation were organisational capacity and programme evaluation, while domains as consistent barriers were partnerships and strategic planning. Environmental support, funding stability, programme adaptation, and communications were found as mixed impacts during three years of implementation.

Discussion and implications: Service providers perceived the overall sustainability of the community-based intergenerational programme as acceptable. Fluctuations in sustainability reflected the life cycle of the programme. Factors affecting the long-term implementation are common practical issues for community-based programme and need to be addressed, especially in the aspects of funding stability, partnerships, and strategic planning, as well as those specific to intergenerational relationship and communication.

评估香港一个为期三年的社区跨代计划的可持续性:从服务提供者的角度进行纵向混合方法研究。
背景和目的:代际规划改善老年人的认知、情感、社会和健康结果。然而,它们的长期可持续性仍不清楚,这对持续的有效性很重要。本研究旨在从服务提供者的角度评估一个为期三年的社区代际项目的可持续性以及潜在的促进因素和障碍。研究设计和方法:采用纵向混合方法。项目可持续性评估工具(PSAT)由八个领域组成,用于评估项目的可持续性能力,即项目在一段时间内保持其运营、效益和影响的能力。PSAT域的障碍和促进因素由每个域的平均值确定。进一步进行半结构化访谈,以确定实施决定因素。负责该计划的28名管理及前线人员,是由三间本地非牟利机构招聘而来。在为期三年的项目中,他们完成了基线调查和三轮PSAT调查,以及三次焦点小组访谈。定量数据进行描述性统计,定性数据进行内容分析。结果:项目实施三年的可持续性总得分基线为5.16±0.65,第一年为5.66±0.54,第二年为5.62±0.67,第三年为5.18±0.48。在三年的实施过程中,组织能力和方案评估是始终如一的促进因素,而伙伴关系和战略规划是始终如一的障碍。在三年的执行过程中,环境支持、资金稳定性、方案适应和沟通被认为是混合影响。讨论和影响:服务提供者认为以社区为基础的代际方案的总体可持续性是可以接受的。可持续性的波动反映了方案的生命周期。影响长期执行的因素是社区方案的共同实际问题,需要加以处理,特别是在资金稳定、伙伴关系和战略规划方面,以及代际关系和交流方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书