Moulage safety practice around the world: a framework for best practice.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jessica Stokes-Parish, Daniel Bauer, Cecile Fourie, Maritza Harvey, Samantha McCormack, Jyotsna Rimal, David Shablak, Naomi Shiner, Janice Sinoski
{"title":"Moulage safety practice around the world: a framework for best practice.","authors":"Jessica Stokes-Parish, Daniel Bauer, Cecile Fourie, Maritza Harvey, Samantha McCormack, Jyotsna Rimal, David Shablak, Naomi Shiner, Janice Sinoski","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00438-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Moulage is ubiquitous with simulated participant (SP) practice. Moulage presents a physical and psychological risk to SPs, due to the application of active products, ingredients, and the creation of highly realistic wounds, which could evoke emotional distress or overidentification. METHODS: The Moulage international Virtual Community of Practice convened in 2023 to commence standards of best practice in relation to moulage use with SPs. Using consensus methodology, the 9 authors catalogued their usual practice, reviewed relevant literature and standards to iteratively develop a conceptual framework and checklist. RESULTS: As a result, a conceptual framework and checklist were developed for safe moulage practice for pre-simulation, during-simulation, and post-simulation phases. The framework highlights key roles and corporate governance to achieve risk mitigation regardless of the simulation setting. To augment the framework, the authors developed the Moulage Application Safety Checklist, a 17-item tool for moulage in use. CONCLUSION: The conceptual framework and checklist provide an evidence-informed tool for considering moulage safety with SPs. Safe use of moulage should not be an afterthought. </p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13188686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00438-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Moulage is ubiquitous with simulated participant (SP) practice. Moulage presents a physical and psychological risk to SPs, due to the application of active products, ingredients, and the creation of highly realistic wounds, which could evoke emotional distress or overidentification. METHODS: The Moulage international Virtual Community of Practice convened in 2023 to commence standards of best practice in relation to moulage use with SPs. Using consensus methodology, the 9 authors catalogued their usual practice, reviewed relevant literature and standards to iteratively develop a conceptual framework and checklist. RESULTS: As a result, a conceptual framework and checklist were developed for safe moulage practice for pre-simulation, during-simulation, and post-simulation phases. The framework highlights key roles and corporate governance to achieve risk mitigation regardless of the simulation setting. To augment the framework, the authors developed the Moulage Application Safety Checklist, a 17-item tool for moulage in use. CONCLUSION: The conceptual framework and checklist provide an evidence-informed tool for considering moulage safety with SPs. Safe use of moulage should not be an afterthought.

世界各地的模压安全实践:最佳实践框架。
背景:模塑在模拟参与者(SP)实践中无处不在。由于使用活性产品和成分,以及制造高度逼真的伤口,可能引起情绪困扰或过度认同,因此对SPs存在生理和心理风险。方法:moage国际虚拟实践社区于2023年召开会议,开始制定与SPs使用moage相关的最佳实践标准。采用共识方法,9位作者对他们的惯例进行了分类,回顾了相关文献和标准,迭代地开发了一个概念框架和清单。结果:因此,开发了一个概念框架和检查表,用于模拟前、模拟中和模拟后阶段的安全模印实践。该框架突出了关键角色和公司治理,以实现风险缓解,而不管模拟设置如何。为了扩大框架,作者开发了模塑应用安全检查表,这是一个17项工具,用于使用模塑。结论:概念框架和检查表为考虑SPs的压模安全性提供了一个循证的工具。安全使用石膏不应该是事后才想到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书