The Effectiveness of Interventions Based on Symptom Clusters for Symptom Burden and Quality of Life Among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1002/nur.70075
Linna Li, Yunhuan Li, Qianwen Yan, Yang Chen, Xiaolin Hu
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Interventions Based on Symptom Clusters for Symptom Burden and Quality of Life Among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Linna Li, Yunhuan Li, Qianwen Yan, Yang Chen, Xiaolin Hu","doi":"10.1002/nur.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer patients suffer severe physical-psychological symptoms presenting as \"symptom clusters,\" causing heavy symptom burden and poor quality of life. Researchers have studied symptom clusters, but whether they could improve symptom burden and quality of life for cancer patients is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions based on symptom clusters for symptom burden of different types of clusters and quality of life among cancer patients. A systematic search was performed across six databases from inception to 17 December 2024. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to check the methodological quality. Data analysis was performed in RStudio, and the intervention effects were explored through a random or fixed effects model. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. We ultimately included nine randomized controlled trials that met the criteria, which were published from 2012 to 2024 and had 998 participants. The results suggested that interventions based on symptom clusters improved symptom burden of mixed symptom clusters (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.04]) and quality of life (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI [0.12, 0.65]), while the relief in symptom burden of physical (SMD = -1.54, 95% CI [-3.34, 0.27]), psychological (SMD = -3.29, 95% CI [-8.09, 1.50]) and gastrointestinal (SMD = -2.24, 95% CI [-4.99, 0.52]) symptom clusters was not significant. To conclude, interventions based on symptom clusters are deemed crucial for improving symptom burden and quality of life among cancer patients. In the future, professionals could tailor interventions considering intervention components and individualized characteristics to further benefit cancer patients. Trial and Protocol Registration: Name: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Number: CRD42023474527.Website link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"529-542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer patients suffer severe physical-psychological symptoms presenting as "symptom clusters," causing heavy symptom burden and poor quality of life. Researchers have studied symptom clusters, but whether they could improve symptom burden and quality of life for cancer patients is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions based on symptom clusters for symptom burden of different types of clusters and quality of life among cancer patients. A systematic search was performed across six databases from inception to 17 December 2024. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to check the methodological quality. Data analysis was performed in RStudio, and the intervention effects were explored through a random or fixed effects model. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. We ultimately included nine randomized controlled trials that met the criteria, which were published from 2012 to 2024 and had 998 participants. The results suggested that interventions based on symptom clusters improved symptom burden of mixed symptom clusters (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.47, -0.04]) and quality of life (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI [0.12, 0.65]), while the relief in symptom burden of physical (SMD = -1.54, 95% CI [-3.34, 0.27]), psychological (SMD = -3.29, 95% CI [-8.09, 1.50]) and gastrointestinal (SMD = -2.24, 95% CI [-4.99, 0.52]) symptom clusters was not significant. To conclude, interventions based on symptom clusters are deemed crucial for improving symptom burden and quality of life among cancer patients. In the future, professionals could tailor interventions considering intervention components and individualized characteristics to further benefit cancer patients. Trial and Protocol Registration: Name: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Number: CRD42023474527.Website link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.

基于症状群的癌症患者症状负担和生活质量干预的有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
癌症患者有严重的生理和心理症状,表现为“症状群”,症状负担重,生活质量差。研究人员已经研究了症状群,但它们是否能改善癌症患者的症状负担和生活质量尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估基于症状聚类的干预措施对不同类型聚类的症状负担和癌症患者生活质量的有效性。从启动到2024年12月17日,对六个数据库进行了系统搜索。采用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具检查方法学质量。在RStudio中进行数据分析,通过随机或固定效应模型探讨干预效果。还进行敏感性分析以评价结果的稳健性。我们最终纳入了9项符合标准的随机对照试验,这些试验发表于2012年至2024年,共有998名参与者。结果表明,基于症状聚类的干预措施改善了混合症状聚类的症状负担(SMD = -0.25, 95% CI[-0.47, -0.04])和生活质量(SMD = 0.38, 95% CI[0.12, 0.65]),而对身体症状聚类(SMD = -1.54, 95% CI[-3.34, 0.27])、心理症状聚类(SMD = -3.29, 95% CI[-8.09, 1.50])和胃肠道症状聚类(SMD = -2.24, 95% CI[-4.99, 0.52])症状负担的缓解效果不显著。综上所述,基于症状群的干预措施对于改善癌症患者的症状负担和生活质量至关重要。在未来,专业人员可以根据干预成分和个体化特征量身定制干预措施,以进一步造福癌症患者。试验与方案注册:名称:国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号:CRD42023474527。网站链接:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书