[Feasibility Study of Rapid Single-Voxel Point-Resolved Spectroscopy in 3.0 T Brain MRI].

Q4 Medicine
Wei Wang, Jiahao Hu, Weinan Xu, Shengjie Hu
{"title":"[Feasibility Study of Rapid Single-Voxel Point-Resolved Spectroscopy in 3.0 T Brain MRI].","authors":"Wei Wang, Jiahao Hu, Weinan Xu, Shengjie Hu","doi":"10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.250398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the feasibility of the 3.0 T brain magnetic resonance single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS SV) fast imaging sequence under different parameter conditions and to compare it with the conventional PRESS sequence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospectively, 200 patients who underwent brain magnetic resonance scans at the Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from September 2022 to August 2024 were selected, including 114 males and 86 females, with an average age of (47.12±11.47) years. Based on three parameter combinations-measured linewidth, total number of scans, and echo time (TE)-the patients were retrospectively divided into 5 groups: ①Control groups: small linewidth conventional short TE PRESS group (39 cases); ②Observation groups: large linewidth fast short TE PRESS group (39 cases), large linewidth fast long TE PRESS group (38 cases), small linewidth fast short TE PRESS group (40 cases), small linewidth fast long TE PRESS group (44 cases). To verify the influence of parameter variables, the control group underwent two conventional PRESS SV sequence scans; the observation groups underwent fast PRESS SV scans followed by an additional conventional PRESS SV scan as a control. The differences in metabolite SNR values and semi-quantitative values obtained from the two scans in each group were analyzed; Logistic regression analysis was performed on the parameters affecting image interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>①The differences in metabolite semi-quantitative values between the two scans in all 5 groups were not statistically significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05). ②The mean Cr SNR of the fast PRESS SV sequence was approximately (57.11±4.07)% of that of the conventional sequence, and the difference was statistically significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). ③For the large linewidth fast PRESS SV sequence with a voxel size of 4.5 cm <sup>3</sup>, the image quality was poor, the rate of uninterpretable spectra was 1.5 to 2 times that of the conventional sequence. ④Logistic regression analysis showed that when the voxel size decreased from 8 cm <sup>3</sup> to 4.5 cm <sup>3</sup>, the risk of uninterpretable images increased by 3.45 times; when the linewidth was ≥9 Hz, the risk increased by 2.09 times; and when TE=144 ms, the risk increased by 2.08 times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3.0 T brain fast PRESS SV sequence can replace the conventional PRESS SV sequence for clinical scanning, shortening the scan time; when the linewidth is ≥9 Hz, it is recommended to use a voxel size of 8 cm <sup>3</sup> or a TE of 35 ms to improve the success rate of imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":"50 2","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.250398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the feasibility of the 3.0 T brain magnetic resonance single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS SV) fast imaging sequence under different parameter conditions and to compare it with the conventional PRESS sequence.

Methods: Retrospectively, 200 patients who underwent brain magnetic resonance scans at the Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from September 2022 to August 2024 were selected, including 114 males and 86 females, with an average age of (47.12±11.47) years. Based on three parameter combinations-measured linewidth, total number of scans, and echo time (TE)-the patients were retrospectively divided into 5 groups: ①Control groups: small linewidth conventional short TE PRESS group (39 cases); ②Observation groups: large linewidth fast short TE PRESS group (39 cases), large linewidth fast long TE PRESS group (38 cases), small linewidth fast short TE PRESS group (40 cases), small linewidth fast long TE PRESS group (44 cases). To verify the influence of parameter variables, the control group underwent two conventional PRESS SV sequence scans; the observation groups underwent fast PRESS SV scans followed by an additional conventional PRESS SV scan as a control. The differences in metabolite SNR values and semi-quantitative values obtained from the two scans in each group were analyzed; Logistic regression analysis was performed on the parameters affecting image interpretation.

Results: ①The differences in metabolite semi-quantitative values between the two scans in all 5 groups were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). ②The mean Cr SNR of the fast PRESS SV sequence was approximately (57.11±4.07)% of that of the conventional sequence, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). ③For the large linewidth fast PRESS SV sequence with a voxel size of 4.5 cm 3, the image quality was poor, the rate of uninterpretable spectra was 1.5 to 2 times that of the conventional sequence. ④Logistic regression analysis showed that when the voxel size decreased from 8 cm 3 to 4.5 cm 3, the risk of uninterpretable images increased by 3.45 times; when the linewidth was ≥9 Hz, the risk increased by 2.09 times; and when TE=144 ms, the risk increased by 2.08 times.

Conclusion: The 3.0 T brain fast PRESS SV sequence can replace the conventional PRESS SV sequence for clinical scanning, shortening the scan time; when the linewidth is ≥9 Hz, it is recommended to use a voxel size of 8 cm 3 or a TE of 35 ms to improve the success rate of imaging.

[快速单体素点分辨光谱在3.0 T脑MRI中的可行性研究]
目的:探讨3.0 T脑磁共振单体素点分辨光谱(PRESS SV)快速成像序列在不同参数条件下的可行性,并与常规PRESS序列进行比较。方法:回顾性选择2022年9月至2024年8月在温州医科大学中西医结合医院行脑磁共振扫描的患者200例,其中男性114例,女性86例,平均年龄(47.12±11.47)岁。根据测量线宽、总扫描次数、回声时间(TE) 3个参数组合,将患者回顾性分为5组:①对照组:小线宽常规短TE按压组(39例);②观察组:大线宽快短TE PRESS组(39例)、大线宽快长TE PRESS组(38例)、小线宽快短TE PRESS组(40例)、小线宽快长TE PRESS组(44例)。为了验证参数变量的影响,对照组进行了两次常规PRESS SV序列扫描;观察组进行快速PRESS SV扫描,然后进行常规PRESS SV扫描作为对照。分析各组两次扫描所得代谢物信噪比值和半定量值的差异;对影响图像解译的参数进行Logistic回归分析。结果:①5组患者两次扫描代谢物半定量值差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。②快速PRESS SV序列的平均Cr信噪比约为常规序列的(57.11±4.07)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③对于体素尺寸为4.5 cm 3的大线宽fast PRESS SV序列,图像质量较差,光谱不可解释率是常规序列的1.5 ~ 2倍。④Logistic回归分析表明,当体素大小从8 cm 3减小到4.5 cm 3时,图像不可解释的风险增加了3.45倍;当线宽≥9 Hz时,风险增加2.09倍;当TE=144 ms时,风险增加2.08倍。结论:3.0 T脑快速PRESS SV序列可替代常规PRESS SV序列用于临床扫描,缩短扫描时间;线宽≥9hz时,建议采用8cm3的体素尺寸或35ms的TE,以提高成像成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医疗器械杂志
中国医疗器械杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8086
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation mainly reports on the development, progress, research and development, production, clinical application, management, and maintenance of medical devices and biomedical engineering. Its aim is to promote the exchange of information on medical devices and biomedical engineering in China and turn the journal into a high-quality academic journal that leads academic directions and advocates academic debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书