Early multidimensional mobility assessments for discriminating discharge-level ambulation and functional independence in subacute stroke inpatients: a retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Early multidimensional mobility assessments for discriminating discharge-level ambulation and functional independence in subacute stroke inpatients: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Seung Heun An, Eun Joo Kim, Jun Min Lee","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v58.45503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether early multidimensional mobility assessments discriminate independent ambulation and functional independence on discharge in subacute stroke inpatients with supervised walking ability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Fifty subacute stroke inpatients (≤ 5 months post-stroke).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Independent ambulation and functional independence were defined as Functional Ambulation Category ≥ 4 and Modified Barthel Index 75 on discharge, respectively. Discriminative ability of admission assessments was evaluated using univariate binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Berg Balance Scale and the modified Four Square Step Test demonstrated the highest discriminative performance. For independent ambulation, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 40.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.88) with 82% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 31.52 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.78 (0.64-0.91) with 80% accuracy. For functional independence, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 42.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (0.60-0.88) with 74% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 32.88 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.71 (0.57-0.86) with 70% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early balance and multidirectional stepping performance may be useful for screening to support goal-setting and discharge planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"58 ","pages":"jrm45503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13093134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether early multidimensional mobility assessments discriminate independent ambulation and functional independence on discharge in subacute stroke inpatients with supervised walking ability.
Methods: Independent ambulation and functional independence were defined as Functional Ambulation Category ≥ 4 and Modified Barthel Index 75 on discharge, respectively. Discriminative ability of admission assessments was evaluated using univariate binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results: The Berg Balance Scale and the modified Four Square Step Test demonstrated the highest discriminative performance. For independent ambulation, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 40.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.88) with 82% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 31.52 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.78 (0.64-0.91) with 80% accuracy. For functional independence, the Berg Balance Scale (≥ 42.5) yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (0.60-0.88) with 74% accuracy, and the modified Four Square Step Test (≤ 32.88 s) yielded an area under the curve of 0.71 (0.57-0.86) with 70% accuracy.
Conclusion: Early balance and multidirectional stepping performance may be useful for screening to support goal-setting and discharge planning.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year.
Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.