Nida Abed, Vanessa Ribeiro Neves, Valerie Matarredona Perez, Daniel Monasor Ortola, Virginia Ferrer García, Bojana Knezevic, Paulo Sousa, Reinhard Strametz, Mercedes Guilabert, José Joaquín Mira
{"title":"Consensus-Based Safety Recommendations for Informal Home Care: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Nida Abed, Vanessa Ribeiro Neves, Valerie Matarredona Perez, Daniel Monasor Ortola, Virginia Ferrer García, Bojana Knezevic, Paulo Sousa, Reinhard Strametz, Mercedes Guilabert, José Joaquín Mira","doi":"10.1002/nur.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As home-based care expands globally, informal caregivers are responsible for medical and nursing responsibilities, raising serious concerns about safety and risk management. This study proposes expert-informed, safety recommendations tailored to informal caregiving in home settings. The study used a six-phase mixed methods design combining a Consensus Development Conference (CDC) process with elements of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In the first five phases, 13 healthcare professionals, hereafter referred to as \"the professionals\" (10 nurses, one physician, one occupational therapist, and one social worker), engaged in deliberations and risk assessments. The professionals agreed on 15 caregiving domains such as medication administration, mobility, and caregiver well-being, mapped them to 53 home caregiving procedures, identified 160 potential failure modes (errors), and rated the effect severity of each failure mode. This process led to the development of an initial set of 450 safety recommendations. In the final phase, a multidisciplinary expert review conducted by the research team merged overlapping items, eliminating redundancies and ensuring accuracy, confirming 53 procedures, 147 distinct failure modes (errors), refining 213 procedure failure mode effect associations, and consolidating the corpus to 288 recommendations. The resulting recommendations are intended to guide the development of safety guidance for informal caregiving in home settings. These recommendations are considered expert-derived guidance, since end users did not participate in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"543-552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As home-based care expands globally, informal caregivers are responsible for medical and nursing responsibilities, raising serious concerns about safety and risk management. This study proposes expert-informed, safety recommendations tailored to informal caregiving in home settings. The study used a six-phase mixed methods design combining a Consensus Development Conference (CDC) process with elements of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). In the first five phases, 13 healthcare professionals, hereafter referred to as "the professionals" (10 nurses, one physician, one occupational therapist, and one social worker), engaged in deliberations and risk assessments. The professionals agreed on 15 caregiving domains such as medication administration, mobility, and caregiver well-being, mapped them to 53 home caregiving procedures, identified 160 potential failure modes (errors), and rated the effect severity of each failure mode. This process led to the development of an initial set of 450 safety recommendations. In the final phase, a multidisciplinary expert review conducted by the research team merged overlapping items, eliminating redundancies and ensuring accuracy, confirming 53 procedures, 147 distinct failure modes (errors), refining 213 procedure failure mode effect associations, and consolidating the corpus to 288 recommendations. The resulting recommendations are intended to guide the development of safety guidance for informal caregiving in home settings. These recommendations are considered expert-derived guidance, since end users did not participate in the study.
期刊介绍:
Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.