The Impact of Preoperative Central Sensitization and Novel Mitigation Strategies on Outcomes Following Spinal Surgery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mohsen Karami, Hagay Amster Kahn, Mina Fakhrzadegan, Amir Abdul-Jabbar, Rod Oskouian, Jens Chapman
{"title":"The Impact of Preoperative Central Sensitization and Novel Mitigation Strategies on Outcomes Following Spinal Surgery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.","authors":"Mohsen Karami, Hagay Amster Kahn, Mina Fakhrzadegan, Amir Abdul-Jabbar, Rod Oskouian, Jens Chapman","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central sensitization (CS) is heightened central nervous system responsiveness to nociceptive input and contributes to the transition from acute to chronic pain. Although increasingly recognized as a predictor of suboptimal outcomes after spinal surgery, no prior review has been synthesized the associations between preoperative CS, underlying mechanisms, and potential perioperative mitigation strategies in spine surgery. This narrative review searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through September 2025 for studies examining preoperative CS-primarily diagnosed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), or related tools-in adults undergoing elective spinal surgery. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, spanning from lumbar disk herniation to cervical myelopathy. Higher preoperative CSI scores (especially ≥40) and abnormal QST findings (reduced pressure pain thresholds, increased temporal summation, impaired conditioned pain modulation) were consistently associated with worse postoperative outcomes, including greater pain intensity, increased disability, poorer quality of life, elevated depressive symptoms, and longer hospital stays. However, leg pain relief after decompression appeared less influenced by CS status in some cohorts. CS prevalence ranged from 10-20% in preoperative populations, with risk factors including prolonged symptom duration, visceral adiposity, pain catastrophizing, and revision surgery. Persistent nociceptive input from degenerative pathology promotes neuroplastic amplification and impaired descending inhibition. Emerging evidence suggests CS may be modifiable: perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE) improves CS scores-particularly in high kinesiophobia subgroups-and animal models indicate that intraoperative neuromodulation may decrease postoperative CS development. Preoperative CS screening (e.g., CSI ≥40) should be included into surgical risk assessment . Targeted prehabilitation (PPNE plus exercise), weight optimization, multimodal analgesia, and exploration of intraoperative neuromodulation are promising strategies to mitigate CS related adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central sensitization (CS) is heightened central nervous system responsiveness to nociceptive input and contributes to the transition from acute to chronic pain. Although increasingly recognized as a predictor of suboptimal outcomes after spinal surgery, no prior review has been synthesized the associations between preoperative CS, underlying mechanisms, and potential perioperative mitigation strategies in spine surgery. This narrative review searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through September 2025 for studies examining preoperative CS-primarily diagnosed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), or related tools-in adults undergoing elective spinal surgery. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, spanning from lumbar disk herniation to cervical myelopathy. Higher preoperative CSI scores (especially ≥40) and abnormal QST findings (reduced pressure pain thresholds, increased temporal summation, impaired conditioned pain modulation) were consistently associated with worse postoperative outcomes, including greater pain intensity, increased disability, poorer quality of life, elevated depressive symptoms, and longer hospital stays. However, leg pain relief after decompression appeared less influenced by CS status in some cohorts. CS prevalence ranged from 10-20% in preoperative populations, with risk factors including prolonged symptom duration, visceral adiposity, pain catastrophizing, and revision surgery. Persistent nociceptive input from degenerative pathology promotes neuroplastic amplification and impaired descending inhibition. Emerging evidence suggests CS may be modifiable: perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE) improves CS scores-particularly in high kinesiophobia subgroups-and animal models indicate that intraoperative neuromodulation may decrease postoperative CS development. Preoperative CS screening (e.g., CSI ≥40) should be included into surgical risk assessment . Targeted prehabilitation (PPNE plus exercise), weight optimization, multimodal analgesia, and exploration of intraoperative neuromodulation are promising strategies to mitigate CS related adverse outcomes.

术前中枢致敏和新型缓解策略对脊柱手术后预后的影响:一项全面的叙事回顾
中枢致敏(CS)是中枢神经系统对伤害性输入的反应性增强,有助于从急性到慢性疼痛的转变。尽管越来越多的人认为CS是脊柱手术后次优预后的预测因素,但在脊柱手术中,术前CS、潜在机制和潜在围手术期缓解策略之间的关联尚未得到综合评价。本文检索了PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌Scholar,检索了截至2025年9月的研究,以检查术前cs -主要使用中央致敏量表(CSI)、定量感觉测试(QST)或相关工具诊断-在接受选择性脊柱手术的成年人中。11项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖从腰椎间盘突出到颈椎病。术前较高的CSI评分(尤其是≥40)和异常的QST结果(压痛阈值降低、时间总和增加、条件性疼痛调节受损)始终与较差的术后结果相关,包括更大的疼痛强度、残疾增加、生活质量较差、抑郁症状加重和住院时间较长。然而,在一些队列中,CS状态对减压后腿部疼痛缓解的影响较小。术前人群CS患病率为10-20%,危险因素包括症状持续时间延长、内脏肥胖、疼痛灾难化和翻修手术。来自退行性病理的持续伤害性输入促进神经可塑性放大和下降抑制受损。新出现的证据表明CS可能是可改变的:围手术期疼痛神经科学教育(PPNE)可提高CS评分-特别是在高运动恐惧症亚组中-动物模型表明术中神经调节可减少术后CS的发展。术前CS筛查(如CSI≥40)应纳入手术风险评估。有针对性的康复(PPNE加运动)、体重优化、多模式镇痛和术中神经调节的探索是减轻CS相关不良后果的有希望的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书