National trends in lumbar facet cyst surgical management: Rising fusion utilization without improved five-year outcomes over decompression alone.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joshua G Sanchez, Julian Smith-Voudouris, Katie M Zehner, Anthony E Seddio, Scott J Halperin, Sahir S Jabbouri, Jeremy K Ansah-Twum, Raj Gala, Jonathan N Grauer
{"title":"National trends in lumbar facet cyst surgical management: Rising fusion utilization without improved five-year outcomes over decompression alone.","authors":"Joshua G Sanchez, Julian Smith-Voudouris, Katie M Zehner, Anthony E Seddio, Scott J Halperin, Sahir S Jabbouri, Jeremy K Ansah-Twum, Raj Gala, Jonathan N Grauer","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Lumbar facet cysts can contribute to lumbar radiculopathy and stenosis. Certain patients with lumbar facet cysts may be considered for surgical intervention, which can include decompression (D) alone or decompression with fusion (D+F). However, the use of one modality versus the other remains a topic of discussion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current study utilized a large, national dataset to characterize yearly rates of D versus D+F utilization, identify factors independently associated with D+F relative to D, compare 90-day overall costs (measured by insurer-payments), and analyze 5-year survival to lumbar reoperation.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver M170 database was queried for adult patients (>17 years of age) who underwent D or D+F with a same-day diagnosis of a lumbar facet synovial cyst. Exclusion criteria included multilevel fusion, coded infection, trauma, or neoplasm related to the spine within 90 days prior to surgery, and database inactivity within 90 days following surgery.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Calendar year incidence rates of D and D+F, independent predictors of D+F relative to D, 90-day postoperative insurer-payments, and 5-year survival to lumbar reoperation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Calendar year incidence rates for both cohorts were trended with linear regression. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of D+F relative to D. Ninety-day postoperative insurer-payments were compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. To determine 5-year survival to subsequent lumbar reoperations, a 1:1 match controlling for age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), spondylolisthesis, and preoperative nicotine or tobacco use was completed for the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves for matched cohorts were created and compared with log-rank test (Mantel-Cox). Significance was defined as P < 0.0045, per Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45,380 patients with surgically managed lumbar facet cysts were identified, of which D alone was performed for 33,988 (74.9%) and D+F for 11,392 (25.1%). The relative incidence of decompression with fusion increased at a greater rate than D alone, such that D+F rose from 22.9% in 2010 to 29.4% in 2022 (β, slope = 0.58% per year, P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis found D+F to be independently more likely for those with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.18), higher ECI (OR 1.06, per 2-point increase), spondylolisthesis (OR 5.04), and treatment by an orthopaedic surgeon (OR 1.29, relative to neurosurgeon) (P < 0.0001 for all). Ninety-day overall insurer-payments were greater for D+F relative to D (median: $7,744 versus $3,731, P < 0.0001). Five-year reoperation-free survival was not significantly different after matching between D versus D+F cohrots (91.5% versus 90.6%, respectively) (P = 0.6000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with lumbar facet cysts were found to be predominantly managed with decompression alone but decompression with fusion gradually increased over the study period. Factors associated with fusion included clinical (age, sex, ECI, and spondylolisthesis) and non-clinical (orthopaedic surgeon provider) variables. With similar 5-year reoperation rates between matched cohorts, careful patient selection for those most likely to benefit from fusion may optimize outcomes and resource utilization at a national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Lumbar facet cysts can contribute to lumbar radiculopathy and stenosis. Certain patients with lumbar facet cysts may be considered for surgical intervention, which can include decompression (D) alone or decompression with fusion (D+F). However, the use of one modality versus the other remains a topic of discussion.

Purpose: The current study utilized a large, national dataset to characterize yearly rates of D versus D+F utilization, identify factors independently associated with D+F relative to D, compare 90-day overall costs (measured by insurer-payments), and analyze 5-year survival to lumbar reoperation.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: The 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver M170 database was queried for adult patients (>17 years of age) who underwent D or D+F with a same-day diagnosis of a lumbar facet synovial cyst. Exclusion criteria included multilevel fusion, coded infection, trauma, or neoplasm related to the spine within 90 days prior to surgery, and database inactivity within 90 days following surgery.

Outcome measures: Calendar year incidence rates of D and D+F, independent predictors of D+F relative to D, 90-day postoperative insurer-payments, and 5-year survival to lumbar reoperation.

Methods: Calendar year incidence rates for both cohorts were trended with linear regression. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of D+F relative to D. Ninety-day postoperative insurer-payments were compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. To determine 5-year survival to subsequent lumbar reoperations, a 1:1 match controlling for age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), spondylolisthesis, and preoperative nicotine or tobacco use was completed for the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves for matched cohorts were created and compared with log-rank test (Mantel-Cox). Significance was defined as P < 0.0045, per Bonferroni correction.

Results: A total of 45,380 patients with surgically managed lumbar facet cysts were identified, of which D alone was performed for 33,988 (74.9%) and D+F for 11,392 (25.1%). The relative incidence of decompression with fusion increased at a greater rate than D alone, such that D+F rose from 22.9% in 2010 to 29.4% in 2022 (β, slope = 0.58% per year, P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis found D+F to be independently more likely for those with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.18), higher ECI (OR 1.06, per 2-point increase), spondylolisthesis (OR 5.04), and treatment by an orthopaedic surgeon (OR 1.29, relative to neurosurgeon) (P < 0.0001 for all). Ninety-day overall insurer-payments were greater for D+F relative to D (median: $7,744 versus $3,731, P < 0.0001). Five-year reoperation-free survival was not significantly different after matching between D versus D+F cohrots (91.5% versus 90.6%, respectively) (P = 0.6000).

Conclusion: Patients with lumbar facet cysts were found to be predominantly managed with decompression alone but decompression with fusion gradually increased over the study period. Factors associated with fusion included clinical (age, sex, ECI, and spondylolisthesis) and non-clinical (orthopaedic surgeon provider) variables. With similar 5-year reoperation rates between matched cohorts, careful patient selection for those most likely to benefit from fusion may optimize outcomes and resource utilization at a national level.

腰椎关节突囊肿手术治疗的全国趋势:与单纯减压相比,融合术使用率上升,但5年预后没有改善。
背景:腰椎关节突囊肿可导致腰椎神经根病和狭窄。某些腰椎关节突囊肿患者可以考虑手术干预,包括单独减压(D)或减压融合(D+F)。然而,一种情态与另一种情态的使用仍然是一个讨论的话题。目的:目前的研究利用了一个大型的国家数据集来表征D和D+F的年利用率,确定与D+F相对于D独立相关的因素,比较90天的总成本(由保险公司支付),并分析腰椎再手术的5年生存率。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。患者样本:在2010年至2022年PearlDiver M170数据库中查询了当日诊断为腰椎小关节滑膜囊肿并接受D或D+F手术的成年患者(bb0 - 17岁)。排除标准包括手术前90天内多节段融合、编码感染、创伤或与脊柱相关的肿瘤,以及手术后90天内数据库不活跃。结果测量:历年D和D+F的发病率,D+F相对于D的独立预测因子,术后90天保险赔付,腰椎再手术的5年生存率。方法:两个队列的历年发病率采用线性回归趋势。采用多变量logistic回归来确定D+F相对于D的独立预测因素。术后90天的保险赔付采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。为了确定到随后腰椎再手术的5年生存率,对两组患者进行1:1匹配,控制年龄、性别、Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)、脊柱滑脱和术前尼古丁或烟草使用。建立匹配队列的Kaplan-Meier曲线,并与log-rank检验(Mantel-Cox)进行比较。根据Bonferroni校正,显著性定义为P < 0.0045。结果:共发现45,380例手术治疗的腰椎关节突囊肿患者,其中33,988例(74.9%)采用D+F, 11,392例(25.1%)采用D+F。减压融合的相对发生率比单纯D增加的速度更快,D+F从2010年的22.9%上升到2022年的29.4% (β,斜率 = 每年0.58%,P < 0.0001)。多变量分析发现,年龄较小(比值比[OR] 1.20,每10年下降)、女性(OR 1.18)、较高的ECI(比值比[OR] 1.06,每2点增加)、脊柱滑脱(OR 5.04)和接受矫形外科医生治疗(OR 1.29,相对于神经外科医生)的患者更可能独立发生D+F (P < 0.0001)。与D相比,D+F的90天总体保险赔付额更高(中位数:7,744美元对3,731美元,P < 0.0001)。D组与D+F组配对后5年无再手术生存率无显著差异(分别为91.5%和90.6%)(P = 0.6000)。结论:腰椎关节突囊肿患者主要采用单独减压治疗,但在研究期间减压融合逐渐增加。与融合相关的因素包括临床(年龄、性别、ECI和脊柱滑脱)和非临床(骨科医生)变量。在匹配的队列中,5年再手术率相似,仔细选择最有可能从融合中获益的患者,可以在全国范围内优化结果和资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书