Timing of Thromboprophylaxis in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A TQIP Study in 15,960 Patients.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aazad Abbas, Robert Koucheki, Jay Toor, Robert Fowler, Avery B Nathens, Albert Yee, Stephen Lewis, Jefferson R Wilson, Christopher D Witiw, Michael G Fehlings, Cari Whyne, Jetan Badhiwala
{"title":"Timing of Thromboprophylaxis in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A TQIP Study in 15,960 Patients.","authors":"Aazad Abbas, Robert Koucheki, Jay Toor, Robert Fowler, Avery B Nathens, Albert Yee, Stephen Lewis, Jefferson R Wilson, Christopher D Witiw, Michael G Fehlings, Cari Whyne, Jetan Badhiwala","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Optimal timing of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is unclear. Most guideline recommendations are consensus-based and lacking in primary large-scale data. This study evaluated an ideal timeframe for delivery of thromboprophylaxis in acute SCI.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the ideal timeframe for initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis in the setting of acute SCI.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. North American trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2022).</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Adults (≥ 16 years) with acute SCI secondary to blunt trauma who underwent surgical decompression within 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Primary: in-hospital venous thromboembolism. Secondary: in-hospital return to the operating room, death during admission and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Restricted cubic splines identified an inflection point defining early versus late thromboprophylaxis initiation, which was used for propensity score-matched comparisons. Covariates for propensity matching included patient, injury, treatment, and hospital characteristics. Effect size was calculated using risk difference (RDs) and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for linear outcomes with associated 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15,960 patients across 511 trauma centres were included. Spline analysis indicated increasing risk after 24-48 hours from surgery. In propensity-matched cohorts for postoperative day 1 (i.e. early <48 hours; late ≥48 hours) (N=6,867 per group), early thromboprophylaxis was associated with lower VTE rates (4.7% vs 5.9%; P=0.002; OR 1.26 [95%CI: 1.09, 1.46]), fewer returns to operating room overall (2.2% vs 2.9%; P=0.004; OR 1.38 [95%CI 1.11, 1.71]), no difference in return to operating room for same-level spine procedure (0.7% vs 1.0%; P=0.07; OR 1.4 [95%CI 0.98, 2.02]), lower mortality (4.0% vs 4.9%; P=0.003; OR 1.28 [95%CI: 1.09, 1.51]), and shorter length of stay (15.8 vs 16.9 days; P<0.001; MD 1.06 days [95%CI: 0.47, 1.65]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thromboprophylaxis by postoperative day 1 after was associated with a decreased risk of venous thromboembolism, decreased returns to the operating room, no increased return to the operating room for related spine procedure, decreased risk of death, and decreased length of stay. Administration of thromboprophylaxis by postoperative day 1 for acute SCI patients may represent a new clinical standard for optimal patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Optimal timing of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is unclear. Most guideline recommendations are consensus-based and lacking in primary large-scale data. This study evaluated an ideal timeframe for delivery of thromboprophylaxis in acute SCI.

Purpose: Determine the ideal timeframe for initiation of chemical thromboprophylaxis in the setting of acute SCI.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study. North American trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2022).

Patient sample: Adults (≥ 16 years) with acute SCI secondary to blunt trauma who underwent surgical decompression within 24 hours.

Outcome measures: Primary: in-hospital venous thromboembolism. Secondary: in-hospital return to the operating room, death during admission and length of stay.

Methods: Restricted cubic splines identified an inflection point defining early versus late thromboprophylaxis initiation, which was used for propensity score-matched comparisons. Covariates for propensity matching included patient, injury, treatment, and hospital characteristics. Effect size was calculated using risk difference (RDs) and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for linear outcomes with associated 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: 15,960 patients across 511 trauma centres were included. Spline analysis indicated increasing risk after 24-48 hours from surgery. In propensity-matched cohorts for postoperative day 1 (i.e. early <48 hours; late ≥48 hours) (N=6,867 per group), early thromboprophylaxis was associated with lower VTE rates (4.7% vs 5.9%; P=0.002; OR 1.26 [95%CI: 1.09, 1.46]), fewer returns to operating room overall (2.2% vs 2.9%; P=0.004; OR 1.38 [95%CI 1.11, 1.71]), no difference in return to operating room for same-level spine procedure (0.7% vs 1.0%; P=0.07; OR 1.4 [95%CI 0.98, 2.02]), lower mortality (4.0% vs 4.9%; P=0.003; OR 1.28 [95%CI: 1.09, 1.51]), and shorter length of stay (15.8 vs 16.9 days; P<0.001; MD 1.06 days [95%CI: 0.47, 1.65]).

Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis by postoperative day 1 after was associated with a decreased risk of venous thromboembolism, decreased returns to the operating room, no increased return to the operating room for related spine procedure, decreased risk of death, and decreased length of stay. Administration of thromboprophylaxis by postoperative day 1 for acute SCI patients may represent a new clinical standard for optimal patient outcomes.

急性脊髓损伤患者血栓预防的时机:15960例患者的TQIP研究
背景背景:急性创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的药物血栓预防的最佳时机尚不清楚。大多数指南建议是基于共识的,缺乏主要的大规模数据。本研究评估了急性脊髓损伤患者提供血栓预防治疗的理想时间框架。目的:确定急性脊髓损伤患者开始化学血栓预防的理想时间框架。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。参加美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划(2017-2022)的北美创伤中心。患者样本:成人(≥16岁)急性脊髓损伤继发于钝性创伤,并在24小时内行手术减压。主要指标:院内静脉血栓栓塞。次要因素:住院返回手术室、住院期间死亡和住院时间。方法:限制三次样条确定了一个定义早期和晚期血栓预防起始的拐点,用于倾向评分匹配比较。倾向匹配的协变量包括患者、损伤、治疗和医院特征。使用风险差(RDs)和二分结果的优势比(OR)计算效应大小,使用具有相关95%置信区间(CI)的线性结果的平均差(MD)计算效应大小。结果:511个创伤中心共纳入15960例患者。样条分析显示手术后24-48小时风险增加。在术后第1天的倾向匹配队列中(即早期)得出结论:术后第1天的血栓预防与静脉血栓栓塞的风险降低、返回手术室的次数减少、返回手术室进行相关脊柱手术的次数不增加、死亡风险降低和住院时间缩短相关。急性脊髓损伤患者术后第1天给予血栓预防治疗可能代表了最佳患者预后的新临床标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书