{"title":"A case study comparing VMAT treatment techniques to reduce dose to femoral heads for postmenopausal women during pelvic radiotherapy","authors":"Jayne Vandervelde M.S., R.T.(T), Melissa Hodges M.S., R.T.(T), Nishele Lenards Ph.D., C.M.D., RT(R)(T), FAAMD, Ashley Hunzeker M.S., CMD, Matt Tobler C.M.D., FAAMD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2026.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a common radiation treatment technique that delivers radiation to the planning target volume (PTV) while sparing the organs at risk (OAR). One limitation of VMAT on Varian linear accelerators is the limited distance the multileaf collimators (MLCs) can travel across the x-axis of the treatment field. The researchers in this case study sought to evaluate whether a split-field technique offers improved sparing of OAR, particularly dose to the femoral heads, in postmenopausal women undergoing treatment for the endometrium and pelvic lymph nodes. In the following retrospective study, 3 patients with endometrial cancer were selected. Two plans were generated for each patient, 1 split-field and 1 full-field. The full-field plan covered the full width of the PTV in both arcs. The split-field plan was created by reducing the X1 jaw to 2.0 cm on the clockwise arc, and the X2 jaw was reduced to 2.0 cm on the counterclockwise arc. PTV coverage along with OAR doses, was evaluated for all plans. All 3 patients showed lower doses to the femoral heads in the split-field plan. Doses to the rectum, bladder, and small bowel were also lower in the split-field plan. Differences in the dose were sometimes very small between the 2 techniques. Overall, the split-field technique demonstrated improved dose reduction over the full-field technique, but more research with a larger sample size is required to confirm the split-field technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 370-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394726000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a common radiation treatment technique that delivers radiation to the planning target volume (PTV) while sparing the organs at risk (OAR). One limitation of VMAT on Varian linear accelerators is the limited distance the multileaf collimators (MLCs) can travel across the x-axis of the treatment field. The researchers in this case study sought to evaluate whether a split-field technique offers improved sparing of OAR, particularly dose to the femoral heads, in postmenopausal women undergoing treatment for the endometrium and pelvic lymph nodes. In the following retrospective study, 3 patients with endometrial cancer were selected. Two plans were generated for each patient, 1 split-field and 1 full-field. The full-field plan covered the full width of the PTV in both arcs. The split-field plan was created by reducing the X1 jaw to 2.0 cm on the clockwise arc, and the X2 jaw was reduced to 2.0 cm on the counterclockwise arc. PTV coverage along with OAR doses, was evaluated for all plans. All 3 patients showed lower doses to the femoral heads in the split-field plan. Doses to the rectum, bladder, and small bowel were also lower in the split-field plan. Differences in the dose were sometimes very small between the 2 techniques. Overall, the split-field technique demonstrated improved dose reduction over the full-field technique, but more research with a larger sample size is required to confirm the split-field technique.
期刊介绍:
Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.