Dynamic Slip Comparing Upright and Supine Positions Predicts Reoperation After Lumbar Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shuhei Ohyama, Masahiro Inoue, Masaya Mizutani, Sumihisa Orita, Yawara Eguchi, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masashi Sato, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Yasushi Iijima, Noritaka Suzuki, Kosuke Takeda, Akihiro Iida, Yu Otake, Toshiaki Kotani, Shohei Minami, Yasuchika Aoki, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"Dynamic Slip Comparing Upright and Supine Positions Predicts Reoperation After Lumbar Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.","authors":"Shuhei Ohyama, Masahiro Inoue, Masaya Mizutani, Sumihisa Orita, Yawara Eguchi, Kazuhide Inage, Yasuhiro Shiga, Masashi Sato, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Yasushi Iijima, Noritaka Suzuki, Kosuke Takeda, Akihiro Iida, Yu Otake, Toshiaki Kotani, Shohei Minami, Yasuchika Aoki, Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Lumbar segmental instability is an important factor in determining surgical strategies for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Although dynamic slip comparing extension and flexion radiographs (DSEF) is commonly used, dynamic slip comparing upright and supine positions (DSUS) has been proposed as an alternative measure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the association between DSUS and postoperative outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery without fusion and to identify a DSUS threshold predictive of reoperation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A total of 188 patients who underwent initial single-level lumbar decompression surgery and were followed for at least three years.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Symptomatic reoperation, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DSUS and DSEF were measured using standing-supine imaging and flexion-extension radiographs. Patients were classified as DSUS-positive (≥3 mm) or DSUS-negative (<3 mm). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared longitudinally. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSUS and DSEF showed moderate correlation (r = 0.37) with frequent discordance. Thirty-three patients (17.6%) were DSUS-positive. DSUS-positive patients had significantly higher reoperation rates, worse postoperative ODI and VAS scores, and greater postoperative slip progression. In Cox models, DSUS independently predicted reoperation after adjustment for key covariates. ROC analysis identified 3.0 mm as the optimal cutoff (area under the curve 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSUS is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes and increased reoperation risk after lumbar decompression surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Lumbar segmental instability is an important factor in determining surgical strategies for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Although dynamic slip comparing extension and flexion radiographs (DSEF) is commonly used, dynamic slip comparing upright and supine positions (DSUS) has been proposed as an alternative measure.

Purpose: To examine the association between DSUS and postoperative outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery without fusion and to identify a DSUS threshold predictive of reoperation.

Study design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: A total of 188 patients who underwent initial single-level lumbar decompression surgery and were followed for at least three years.

Outcome measures: Symptomatic reoperation, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic parameters.

Methods: DSUS and DSEF were measured using standing-supine imaging and flexion-extension radiographs. Patients were classified as DSUS-positive (≥3 mm) or DSUS-negative (<3 mm). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared longitudinally. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.

Results: DSUS and DSEF showed moderate correlation (r = 0.37) with frequent discordance. Thirty-three patients (17.6%) were DSUS-positive. DSUS-positive patients had significantly higher reoperation rates, worse postoperative ODI and VAS scores, and greater postoperative slip progression. In Cox models, DSUS independently predicted reoperation after adjustment for key covariates. ROC analysis identified 3.0 mm as the optimal cutoff (area under the curve 0.90).

Conclusions: DSUS is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes and increased reoperation risk after lumbar decompression surgery.

动态滑移比较直立和仰卧位预测退行性腰椎疾病腰椎减压手术后再手术。
背景:腰椎节段性不稳定是决定退行性腰椎疾病手术策略的重要因素。虽然通常使用的是动态滑移比较伸展和屈曲x线片(DSEF),但已经提出了动态滑移比较直立和仰卧位(DSUS)作为替代措施。目的:探讨无融合腰椎减压术后DSUS与术后预后的关系,并确定预测再次手术的DSUS阈值。研究设计:多中心回顾性队列研究。患者样本:共有188例患者接受了初始单节段腰椎减压手术,随访时间至少为3年。结果测量:有症状的再手术、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和影像学参数。方法:采用站立仰卧位显像和屈伸片测量DSUS和DSEF。患者分为DSUS阳性(≥3 mm)和DSUS阴性(结果:DSUS与DSEF呈中等相关性(r = 0.37),但经常出现不一致。33例患者(17.6%)为dsus阳性。dsus阳性患者的再手术率明显较高,术后ODI和VAS评分较差,术后滑脱进展较大。在Cox模型中,DSUS独立预测关键协变量调整后的再手术。ROC分析确定3.0 mm为最佳截止(曲线下面积0.90)。结论:DSUS与腰椎减压手术后较差的术后预后和增加的再手术风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书