A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Evaluating the Utility of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in Screening for Spinal Instability and Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk in Plasma Cell Neoplasm and Lymphoma Lesions.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joshua L Golubovsky, George A Crabill, Akshath Rajan, Ian Messing, Elie Massaad, Bonnie Y Hu, Claudia Hejazi-Garcia, Connor A Wathen, Michael Shost, Ali K Ozturk, John H Shin, Cara A Cipriano, Kristy L Weber, Gabrielle W Peters, Anish A Butala, Neil R Malhotra, James M Schuster
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Evaluating the Utility of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in Screening for Spinal Instability and Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk in Plasma Cell Neoplasm and Lymphoma Lesions.","authors":"Joshua L Golubovsky, George A Crabill, Akshath Rajan, Ian Messing, Elie Massaad, Bonnie Y Hu, Claudia Hejazi-Garcia, Connor A Wathen, Michael Shost, Ali K Ozturk, John H Shin, Cara A Cipriano, Kristy L Weber, Gabrielle W Peters, Anish A Butala, Neil R Malhotra, James M Schuster","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Spinal column tumors with Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores (SINS) suggesting instability often trigger referrals to spine surgeons. Plasma cell lesions and lymphoma are highly radiosensitive histologies, and may re-ossify after radiation therapy. The SINS score, designed to assess the need for surgical stabilization for spinal neoplasms, may therefore overestimate instability in patients with these radiosensitive histologies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Herein we seek to determine if the SINS score is significantly correlated with lesion instability and vertebral compression fracture progression in patients with plasma cell neoplasms or lymphoma of the spine.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with spinal plasma cell or lymphoma lesions with identifiable primary lesions were found by querying our institutional electronic medical record from 2010-2024. All patients were at least 18 years of age.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, radiation data, surgical data, and imaging data were collected. Outcomes included development of spinal instability, new or progressive vertebral compression fracture, and follow-up neurological status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate categorical outcomes, while Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess time to mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>240 patients were identified with a mean SINS of 9.79. 23 patients had lesions classified as stable (SINS 0-6, 9.8%), 183 had lesions classified as possibly unstable (SINS 7-12, 76.3%), and 34 had lesions classified as unstable (SINS 13-18, 14.2%). 27 patients underwent surgical management (2 SINS stable, 20 possibly unstable, and 5 unstable), with a 90-day reoperation rate of 11.1% and a 90-day readmission rate of 29.6%. At 3-month follow-up, factors associated with development of instability were higher total SINS score (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, p < 0.001), SINS unstable lesions compared with possibly unstable lesions (OR 2.69, p = 0.028), younger age (OR 0.98 per year, p < 0.001), and higher radiation biologically effective dose (OR 1.03, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, factors associated with new or progressive vertebral compression fracture were higher total SINS score (OR 1.45, p < 0.001), SINS unstable lesions compared with possibly unstable (OR 3.59, p = 0.002), possibly unstable lesions compared with stable (OR Stable 0.22, p = 0.029), and increased age (OR 1.01 per year, p < 0.001), while larger baseline VB height (OR 0.91, p < 0.001) and bisphosphonate or RANK-ligand inhibitor use (OR 0.61, p = 0.009) were protective. SINS was not significantly associated with follow-up neurological status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SINS is a useful prognostic factor for the development of instability and new or progressive vertebral compression fracture in patients with plasma cell or lymphoma spinal lesions. However, current thresholds used to define the possibly unstable category may not reliably reflect true instability in these radiosensitive lesions. Surgical decision-making paradigms must be carefully assessed in these patients, given the significant rates of morbidity associated with surgical management of these lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Spinal column tumors with Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores (SINS) suggesting instability often trigger referrals to spine surgeons. Plasma cell lesions and lymphoma are highly radiosensitive histologies, and may re-ossify after radiation therapy. The SINS score, designed to assess the need for surgical stabilization for spinal neoplasms, may therefore overestimate instability in patients with these radiosensitive histologies.

Purpose: Herein we seek to determine if the SINS score is significantly correlated with lesion instability and vertebral compression fracture progression in patients with plasma cell neoplasms or lymphoma of the spine.

Study design: This was a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis.

Patient sample: Patients with spinal plasma cell or lymphoma lesions with identifiable primary lesions were found by querying our institutional electronic medical record from 2010-2024. All patients were at least 18 years of age.

Outcome measures: Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, radiation data, surgical data, and imaging data were collected. Outcomes included development of spinal instability, new or progressive vertebral compression fracture, and follow-up neurological status.

Methods: Multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate categorical outcomes, while Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to assess time to mortality.

Results: 240 patients were identified with a mean SINS of 9.79. 23 patients had lesions classified as stable (SINS 0-6, 9.8%), 183 had lesions classified as possibly unstable (SINS 7-12, 76.3%), and 34 had lesions classified as unstable (SINS 13-18, 14.2%). 27 patients underwent surgical management (2 SINS stable, 20 possibly unstable, and 5 unstable), with a 90-day reoperation rate of 11.1% and a 90-day readmission rate of 29.6%. At 3-month follow-up, factors associated with development of instability were higher total SINS score (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, p < 0.001), SINS unstable lesions compared with possibly unstable lesions (OR 2.69, p = 0.028), younger age (OR 0.98 per year, p < 0.001), and higher radiation biologically effective dose (OR 1.03, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, factors associated with new or progressive vertebral compression fracture were higher total SINS score (OR 1.45, p < 0.001), SINS unstable lesions compared with possibly unstable (OR 3.59, p = 0.002), possibly unstable lesions compared with stable (OR Stable 0.22, p = 0.029), and increased age (OR 1.01 per year, p < 0.001), while larger baseline VB height (OR 0.91, p < 0.001) and bisphosphonate or RANK-ligand inhibitor use (OR 0.61, p = 0.009) were protective. SINS was not significantly associated with follow-up neurological status.

Conclusions: SINS is a useful prognostic factor for the development of instability and new or progressive vertebral compression fracture in patients with plasma cell or lymphoma spinal lesions. However, current thresholds used to define the possibly unstable category may not reliably reflect true instability in these radiosensitive lesions. Surgical decision-making paradigms must be carefully assessed in these patients, given the significant rates of morbidity associated with surgical management of these lesions.

一项评估脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分(SINS)在筛查浆细胞肿瘤和淋巴瘤病变中脊柱不稳定和椎体压缩性骨折风险中的效用的回顾性队列分析。
背景背景:脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分(SINS)提示脊柱不稳定的脊柱肿瘤通常会引起脊柱外科医生的转诊。浆细胞病变和淋巴瘤是高度放射敏感的组织学,放射治疗后可能会再骨化。因此,设计用于评估脊柱肿瘤手术稳定需要的SINS评分可能高估了这些放射敏感组织学患者的不稳定性。目的:在本文中,我们试图确定SINS评分是否与脊柱浆细胞肿瘤或淋巴瘤患者的病变不稳定性和椎体压缩性骨折进展显著相关。研究设计:这是一项回顾性单机构队列分析。患者样本:通过查询我们2010-2024年的机构电子病历,发现有可识别原发病变的脊髓浆细胞或淋巴瘤病变患者。所有患者年龄均在18岁以上。结果测量:收集了人口统计学、合并症、症状、放射数据、手术数据和影像学数据。结果包括脊柱不稳定的发展,新的或进行性椎体压缩性骨折,以及随访的神经系统状态。方法:采用多变量logistic回归评估分类结果,采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估死亡时间。结果:共检出240例患者,平均SINS为9.79。稳定23例(SINS 0-6, 9.8%),可能不稳定183例(SINS 7-12, 76.3%),不稳定34例(SINS 13-18, 14.2%)。27例患者接受手术治疗(稳定2例,可能不稳定20例,不稳定5例),90天再手术率为11.1%,90天再入院率为29.6%。在3个月的随访中,与不稳定发展相关的因素是SINS总评分较高(比值比(OR) 1.38, p < 0.001), SINS不稳定病变与可能不稳定病变相比(OR 2.69, p = 0.028),年龄较小(OR 0.98 /年,p < 0.001),以及较高的辐射生物有效剂量(OR 1.03, p < 0.001)。同时,与新发或进展性椎体压缩性骨折相关的因素有:SINS总评分较高(or 1.45, p < 0.001), SINS不稳定病变与可能不稳定病变相比(or 3.59, p = 0.002),SINS不稳定病变与可能不稳定病变相比(or稳定0.22,p = 0.029),年龄增加(or 1.01 /年,p < 0.001),而基线VB高度较高(or 0.91, p < 0.001)和双膦酸盐或rank -配体抑制剂的使用(or 0.61, p = 0.009)具有保护作用。SINS与随访神经系统状态无显著相关性。结论:SINS是预测浆细胞或淋巴瘤脊柱病变患者发生不稳定和椎体压缩性骨折的有效预后因素。然而,目前用于定义可能不稳定类别的阈值可能不能可靠地反映这些放射敏感病变的真实不稳定性。考虑到这些病变的手术治疗相关的发病率很高,必须仔细评估这些患者的手术决策范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书