Sonorheometry to detect traumatic induced coagulopathy during initial management of trauma patients: an observational, multi-center study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gary Duclos, Pierre Antoine Seube Remy, Mathieu Willig, Mohamed Boucekine, Charles Deregnaucourt, Charlotte Grosdidier, Paul Leblanc, Delphine Garrigue, Marc Leone
{"title":"Sonorheometry to detect traumatic induced coagulopathy during initial management of trauma patients: an observational, multi-center study.","authors":"Gary Duclos, Pierre Antoine Seube Remy, Mathieu Willig, Mohamed Boucekine, Charles Deregnaucourt, Charlotte Grosdidier, Paul Leblanc, Delphine Garrigue, Marc Leone","doi":"10.1186/s13049-026-01610-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In severe trauma 30% of the patients develop a trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), which is associated with higher mortality, massive transfusion and prolonged intensive care stay. Conventional coagulation assays present limitations to detect TIC, primarily due to delayed turnaround time. To enhance early management of TIC viscoelastic tests have been included into guidelines as a standard of care. The Quantra device, based on sonorheometry analysis, offers a rapid bedside assessment of coagulation but lacks validation in a trauma population. The aim of this study was to validate Quantra to detect TIC compared with standard blood coagulation test in severe trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data (January 1, 2022-December 31, 2024) across four level-1 trauma centers. Trauma patients > 16 years underwent simultaneous Quantra and standard laboratory testing at hospital admission. Diagnostic performance for prespecified thresholds-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio > 1.5, prothrombin time ratio (PTr) > 1.5, fibrinogen ≤ 1.5 g/L, and platelet concentration ≤ 50, ≤ 100, and ≤ 150 G/L-was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves in a derivation cohort, with Youden-optimized cutoffs applied to an external validation cohort to determine their specific positive and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The derivation and validation cohorts included 285 and 219 patients, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.91 [0.84-0.98] for clot time to predict an aPTT ratio > 1.5 with a best cutoff of 144.5s; 0.82 [0.75-0.90] for clot stiffness to predict a PTr > 1.5 (best cutoff 15.4hPa); 0.87 [0.81-0.93] for fibrinogen contribution to clot stiffness to predict a fibrinogen concentration < 1.5g/L (best cutoff 1.1hPa); 0.90 [0.84-0.95] for platelet contribution to clot stiffness to predict a platelets count ≤ 100G/L (best cutoff 12.4hPa). In the validation cohort, positive predictive and negative predictive values for best cutoffs were 0.67 [0.50-0.80] and 1.00 [0.98-1.00] for clot time, 0.50 [0.39-0.61] and 0.88 [0.80-0.93] for clot stiffness, 0.58 [0.44-0.70] and 0.91 [0.85-0.95] for fibrinogen contribution to clot stiffness, 0.13 [0.24-0.99] and 0.99 [0.96-1.00] for platelets contribution to clot stiffness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early Quantra analysis seems to provide rapid and reliable exclusion of TIC. Prospective investigations remain required to determine usefulness in TIC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13191944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-026-01610-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In severe trauma 30% of the patients develop a trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), which is associated with higher mortality, massive transfusion and prolonged intensive care stay. Conventional coagulation assays present limitations to detect TIC, primarily due to delayed turnaround time. To enhance early management of TIC viscoelastic tests have been included into guidelines as a standard of care. The Quantra device, based on sonorheometry analysis, offers a rapid bedside assessment of coagulation but lacks validation in a trauma population. The aim of this study was to validate Quantra to detect TIC compared with standard blood coagulation test in severe trauma patients.

Methods: We performed a multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data (January 1, 2022-December 31, 2024) across four level-1 trauma centers. Trauma patients > 16 years underwent simultaneous Quantra and standard laboratory testing at hospital admission. Diagnostic performance for prespecified thresholds-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio > 1.5, prothrombin time ratio (PTr) > 1.5, fibrinogen ≤ 1.5 g/L, and platelet concentration ≤ 50, ≤ 100, and ≤ 150 G/L-was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves in a derivation cohort, with Youden-optimized cutoffs applied to an external validation cohort to determine their specific positive and negative predictive values.

Results: The derivation and validation cohorts included 285 and 219 patients, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.91 [0.84-0.98] for clot time to predict an aPTT ratio > 1.5 with a best cutoff of 144.5s; 0.82 [0.75-0.90] for clot stiffness to predict a PTr > 1.5 (best cutoff 15.4hPa); 0.87 [0.81-0.93] for fibrinogen contribution to clot stiffness to predict a fibrinogen concentration < 1.5g/L (best cutoff 1.1hPa); 0.90 [0.84-0.95] for platelet contribution to clot stiffness to predict a platelets count ≤ 100G/L (best cutoff 12.4hPa). In the validation cohort, positive predictive and negative predictive values for best cutoffs were 0.67 [0.50-0.80] and 1.00 [0.98-1.00] for clot time, 0.50 [0.39-0.61] and 0.88 [0.80-0.93] for clot stiffness, 0.58 [0.44-0.70] and 0.91 [0.85-0.95] for fibrinogen contribution to clot stiffness, 0.13 [0.24-0.99] and 0.99 [0.96-1.00] for platelets contribution to clot stiffness.

Conclusion: Early Quantra analysis seems to provide rapid and reliable exclusion of TIC. Prospective investigations remain required to determine usefulness in TIC management.

超声测量在创伤患者初始治疗过程中检测外伤性凝血功能障碍:一项观察性多中心研究。
背景:在严重创伤中,30%的患者会出现创伤性凝血功能障碍(TIC),这与较高的死亡率、大量输血和延长重症监护时间有关。传统的凝血试验存在检测TIC的局限性,主要是由于延迟的周转时间。为了加强对TIC粘弹性测试的早期管理,已将其作为一种护理标准纳入指南。Quantra设备,基于超声分析,提供了凝血的快速床边评估,但缺乏在创伤人群中的验证。本研究的目的是验证Quantra与标准凝血试验在严重创伤患者中检测TIC的有效性。方法:我们对四个一级创伤中心的前瞻性数据(2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日)进行了多中心分析。16岁的创伤患者在入院时同时进行了Quantra和标准实验室检测。在衍生队列中,通过受试者工作特征曲线评估预先设定阈值(激活的部分凝血活素时间(aPTT)比率> 1.5、凝血酶原时间比率(PTr) > 1.5、纤维蛋白原≤1.5 g/L和血小板浓度≤50、≤100和≤150 g/L)的诊断性能,并将优登优化截断值应用于外部验证队列,以确定其特定的阳性和阴性预测值。结果:推导和验证队列分别包括285例和219例患者。在衍生队列中,凝块时间的曲线下面积(auc)为0.91[0.84-0.98],预测aPTT比为bb0 1.5,最佳截止时间为144.5s;0.82[0.75-0.90]的凝块刚度预测PTr为1.5(最佳临界值15.4hPa);0.87[0.81-0.93]纤维蛋白原对凝块硬度的贡献预测纤维蛋白原浓度结论:早期Quantra分析似乎可以快速可靠地排除TIC。仍需进行前瞻性调查,以确定在TIC管理中的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书