{"title":"Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Receipt of Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Meng-Han Tsai, Steven S Coughlin, Jorge Cortes","doi":"10.1177/10732748261433621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo examine disparities in receipt of the first course of treatment modality used among individuals diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer, focusing on sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality differences.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing national data from the 2006-2020 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program among adults aged 20-49. Key factors included sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality. Our main outcomes were whether patients started treatment, and which types they received. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed.ResultsOf total 82,427 patients, males (54.9%, p=0.097), racial minorities (0.8%-23.3%, p<0.001), and patients in all urban areas (70.7%; p<0.001) had higher rates of no treatment. Adjusted analysis showed that male patients had16%-19% lower odds of receiving surgery regardless of rurality (p<0.05) compared with female patients. In all/mostly urban areas, Black patients were found to had 17%-41% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (p<0.05); Hispanic patients had 11%-24% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (mostly urban: OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) or surgery alone (all urban: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95) compared with White patients. In rural areas, 33% and 34% lower odds of receiving radiation treatment were found among American Indian (AI)/Alaska Native (AN) (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98) and Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) patients (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99) compared with White patients, respectively.ConclusionsDisparities in receipt of surgery treatment were observed in males regardless of rurality. Black and Hispanic patients in urban areas had lower treatment use, while AI/AN and Asian/PI patients in rural areas were less likely to start radiation. Targeted approaches for specific groups are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261433621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13087340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261433621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeTo examine disparities in receipt of the first course of treatment modality used among individuals diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer, focusing on sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality differences.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing national data from the 2006-2020 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program among adults aged 20-49. Key factors included sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality. Our main outcomes were whether patients started treatment, and which types they received. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed.ResultsOf total 82,427 patients, males (54.9%, p=0.097), racial minorities (0.8%-23.3%, p<0.001), and patients in all urban areas (70.7%; p<0.001) had higher rates of no treatment. Adjusted analysis showed that male patients had16%-19% lower odds of receiving surgery regardless of rurality (p<0.05) compared with female patients. In all/mostly urban areas, Black patients were found to had 17%-41% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (p<0.05); Hispanic patients had 11%-24% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (mostly urban: OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) or surgery alone (all urban: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95) compared with White patients. In rural areas, 33% and 34% lower odds of receiving radiation treatment were found among American Indian (AI)/Alaska Native (AN) (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98) and Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) patients (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99) compared with White patients, respectively.ConclusionsDisparities in receipt of surgery treatment were observed in males regardless of rurality. Black and Hispanic patients in urban areas had lower treatment use, while AI/AN and Asian/PI patients in rural areas were less likely to start radiation. Targeted approaches for specific groups are needed.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.