Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics.

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mao Li, Shuo Wu, Xuejuan Zi
{"title":"Identification of silage bacterial clusters and analysis of their microecological characteristics.","authors":"Mao Li, Shuo Wu, Xuejuan Zi","doi":"10.1186/s40793-026-00891-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enterotypes refer to the different bacterial clusters in the gut microecosystem, which are closely related to host physiology, digestion, disease, and other phenotypes. However, whether there are clear clusters in the silage microecosystem, and the fermentation quality and characteristics of unique cluster silage remain unknown. To determine whether distinct bacterial clusters exist in the silage microecosystem and to characterize their fermentation properties, we analyzed the bacterial community composition and fermentation quality of 156 silage samples, and further explored their underlying microbial ecological features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirmed three distinct clusters in the silage microbiome, which were named according to their dominant bacterial taxa: the E-cluster (characterized by a higher abundance of unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (UG)), the P-cluster (enriched with Pseudomonas and Janthinobacterium), and the L-cluster (dominated by Lactobacillus). These microbial clusters were closely associated with fermentation quality: the L-cluster exhibited superior silage quality compared to the E- and P-clusters. Meanwhile, the microbial functional profiles differed significantly among the three clusters of silage. Numerous pathways were significantly enriched in the P-cluster, such as the Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, etc. Moreover, bacterial co-occurrence networks of three clusters silage displayed cooperative interactions mainly, P-cluster silage network was more complex and tighter, E-cluster silage has more functional microbial units and more stable. Furthermore, the assembly of microbial communities in the three silage clusters was dominated by stochastic processes. Specifically, the E-cluster and L-cluster were governed by ecological drift, while dispersal limitation was more influential in the P-cluster.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, we found in our study that the silage microbiome can be divided into three clusters, and different clusters have significant differences in fermentation quality, microbial diversity and compositions, functional profiles, microbial network characteristics and community assembly mechanisms. These results could broaden our comprehension of the silage microbial ecology processes and also provide a scientific basis on which to develop a method to precisely regulate silage quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48553,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-026-00891-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enterotypes refer to the different bacterial clusters in the gut microecosystem, which are closely related to host physiology, digestion, disease, and other phenotypes. However, whether there are clear clusters in the silage microecosystem, and the fermentation quality and characteristics of unique cluster silage remain unknown. To determine whether distinct bacterial clusters exist in the silage microecosystem and to characterize their fermentation properties, we analyzed the bacterial community composition and fermentation quality of 156 silage samples, and further explored their underlying microbial ecological features.

Results: We confirmed three distinct clusters in the silage microbiome, which were named according to their dominant bacterial taxa: the E-cluster (characterized by a higher abundance of unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (UG)), the P-cluster (enriched with Pseudomonas and Janthinobacterium), and the L-cluster (dominated by Lactobacillus). These microbial clusters were closely associated with fermentation quality: the L-cluster exhibited superior silage quality compared to the E- and P-clusters. Meanwhile, the microbial functional profiles differed significantly among the three clusters of silage. Numerous pathways were significantly enriched in the P-cluster, such as the Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, etc. Moreover, bacterial co-occurrence networks of three clusters silage displayed cooperative interactions mainly, P-cluster silage network was more complex and tighter, E-cluster silage has more functional microbial units and more stable. Furthermore, the assembly of microbial communities in the three silage clusters was dominated by stochastic processes. Specifically, the E-cluster and L-cluster were governed by ecological drift, while dispersal limitation was more influential in the P-cluster.

Conclusions: Overall, we found in our study that the silage microbiome can be divided into three clusters, and different clusters have significant differences in fermentation quality, microbial diversity and compositions, functional profiles, microbial network characteristics and community assembly mechanisms. These results could broaden our comprehension of the silage microbial ecology processes and also provide a scientific basis on which to develop a method to precisely regulate silage quality.

青贮菌群的鉴定及其微生态特性分析。
背景:肠型是指肠道微生态系统中不同的细菌群,它们与宿主生理、消化、疾病等表型密切相关。然而,青贮微生态系统中是否存在明确的簇状青贮,以及独特簇状青贮的发酵品质和特性尚不清楚。为了确定青贮微生态系统中是否存在不同的细菌群并表征其发酵特性,我们分析了156份青贮样品的细菌群落组成和发酵品质,并进一步探讨了其潜在的微生物生态特征。结果:我们在青贮菌群中确定了三个不同的集群,并根据它们的优势细菌分类群命名:e集群(以未分类的肠杆菌科(UG)的丰度较高为特征),p集群(富含假单胞菌和Janthinobacterium), l集群(以乳酸杆菌为主)。这些微生物群与发酵质量密切相关:与E-和p -群相比,l -群表现出更好的青贮品质。同时,3个青贮群的微生物功能谱也存在显著差异。p -簇中有许多途径显著富集,如其他次生代谢物的生物合成等。此外,3个青贮团簇的细菌共生网络主要表现为合作相互作用,p团簇青贮网络更复杂、更紧密,e团簇青贮的功能微生物单位更多、更稳定。此外,3个青贮群中微生物群落的聚集受随机过程支配。其中,e -集群和l -集群受生态漂移的支配,而p -集群受扩散限制的影响更大。结论:总体而言,本研究发现青贮微生物组可分为3个集群,不同集群在发酵质量、微生物多样性和组成、功能概况、微生物网络特征和群落组装机制等方面存在显著差异。这些结果可以拓宽我们对青贮微生物生态过程的认识,并为制定青贮品质的精确调控方法提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiome
Environmental Microbiome Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Microorganisms, omnipresent across Earth's diverse environments, play a crucial role in adapting to external changes, influencing Earth's systems and cycles, and contributing significantly to agricultural practices. Through applied microbiology, they offer solutions to various everyday needs. Environmental Microbiome recognizes the universal presence and significance of microorganisms, inviting submissions that explore the diverse facets of environmental and applied microbiological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书