Palliativmedizinische Aspekte in der physiotherapeutischen Ausbildung und im Studium: Eine deutschlandweite Befragung von Ausbildungsstätten und Hochschulen

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alisa Schmitt , Christian Volberg , Tom Militzer , Anna Elisabeth Pape , Sandra Apelt , Paula Vradelis
{"title":"Palliativmedizinische Aspekte in der physiotherapeutischen Ausbildung und im Studium: Eine deutschlandweite Befragung von Ausbildungsstätten und Hochschulen","authors":"Alisa Schmitt ,&nbsp;Christian Volberg ,&nbsp;Tom Militzer ,&nbsp;Anna Elisabeth Pape ,&nbsp;Sandra Apelt ,&nbsp;Paula Vradelis","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2026.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Palliative care is becoming increasingly important, yet it is unclear to what extent it is incorporated into physiotherapy training and university education. This study systematically documents the current situation at German physiotherapy training centres and universities, analysing institutional barriers and attitudes towards future implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2024, where 278 educational institutions were contacted by mail. A standardised paper questionnaire was used to collect data on various factors, including training type, status and scope of curricular integration, teaching formats, perceived barriers, and attitudes towards future implementation. Data were evaluated descriptively; answers to open-ended questions were summarised using content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 120 institutions (43.2%) participated. Of these, 54.2% predominantly teach palliative care theoretically (98.5%), with practical (53.8%) and patient-related (24.6%) formats being used as well. The reasons for integration included legal and curricular requirements, career preparation, and improving the quality of care. Of those who did not integrate palliative care into their curriculum, 45.8% cited inconsistent nationwide legal requirements (with some federal states having no regulations), and 52.7% mentioned a lack of qualified teaching staff. Just under a third cited a lack of time in the curriculum and a lack of cooperation partners for patient-centred teaching as a reason. A total of 92.6% endorse future integration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Currently, palliative care content is included in the curriculums at only about half of the German physiotherapy training centres and universities, and implementation, scope and timing vary greatly. There is a broad consensus on the need for future integration, indicating the necessity of nation wide uniform curricula and qualified teaching staff in order to develop palliative care skills already during the training phase and remedy structural deficits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"202 ","pages":"Pages 83-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921726000553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Palliative care is becoming increasingly important, yet it is unclear to what extent it is incorporated into physiotherapy training and university education. This study systematically documents the current situation at German physiotherapy training centres and universities, analysing institutional barriers and attitudes towards future implementation.

Methodology

A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2024, where 278 educational institutions were contacted by mail. A standardised paper questionnaire was used to collect data on various factors, including training type, status and scope of curricular integration, teaching formats, perceived barriers, and attitudes towards future implementation. Data were evaluated descriptively; answers to open-ended questions were summarised using content analysis.

Results

A total of 120 institutions (43.2%) participated. Of these, 54.2% predominantly teach palliative care theoretically (98.5%), with practical (53.8%) and patient-related (24.6%) formats being used as well. The reasons for integration included legal and curricular requirements, career preparation, and improving the quality of care. Of those who did not integrate palliative care into their curriculum, 45.8% cited inconsistent nationwide legal requirements (with some federal states having no regulations), and 52.7% mentioned a lack of qualified teaching staff. Just under a third cited a lack of time in the curriculum and a lack of cooperation partners for patient-centred teaching as a reason. A total of 92.6% endorse future integration.

Conclusion

Currently, palliative care content is included in the curriculums at only about half of the German physiotherapy training centres and universities, and implementation, scope and timing vary greatly. There is a broad consensus on the need for future integration, indicating the necessity of nation wide uniform curricula and qualified teaching staff in order to develop palliative care skills already during the training phase and remedy structural deficits.
[在物理治疗培训和研究中的姑息治疗:德国范围内职业培训中心和大学的调查]。
目的:姑息治疗正变得越来越重要,但目前尚不清楚它在多大程度上被纳入物理治疗培训和大学教育。这项研究系统地记录了德国物理治疗培训中心和大学的现状,分析了体制障碍和对未来实施的态度。方法:在2024年1月至4月期间进行了全国性的横断面调查,通过邮件联系了278所教育机构。使用标准化纸质问卷收集各种因素的数据,包括培训类型、课程整合的现状和范围、教学形式、感知到的障碍以及对未来实施的态度。对数据进行描述性评价;对开放式问题的回答使用内容分析进行总结。结果:共有120家机构参与,占43.2%。其中,54.2%主要教授姑息治疗理论(98.5%),实际(53.8%)和患者相关(24.6%)格式也被使用。整合的原因包括法律和课程要求、职业准备和提高护理质量。在那些没有将姑息治疗纳入课程的学校中,45.8%的人表示全国法律要求不一致(一些联邦州没有相关规定),52.7%的人表示缺乏合格的教学人员。不到三分之一的人认为,课程时间不够,缺乏以病人为中心的教学合作伙伴是原因之一。92.6%的人支持未来的一体化。结论:目前,只有大约一半的德国物理治疗培训中心和大学将姑息治疗内容纳入课程,且实施、范围和时间差异很大。人们对未来整合的必要性达成了广泛的共识,表明有必要在全国范围内制定统一的课程和合格的教学人员,以便在培训阶段就培养姑息治疗技能,并弥补结构性缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书