The Implementation of a CDC Guideline Using an Evidence-Based Risk Assessment Tool to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Patients.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Jaime L Musone
{"title":"The Implementation of a CDC Guideline Using an Evidence-Based Risk Assessment Tool to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Patients.","authors":"Jaime L Musone","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2024-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Over the years, colorectal cancer (CRC) has been diagnosed in younger adults less than 50 years of age, most common in those with Lynch syndrome. In turn, CRC has become the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths. According to Sinicrope et al. it is imperative in identifying inherited syndromes, Lynch syndrome being the most recurrent. <b>Objective:</b> This quality improvement project aimed to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care patients by implementing a CDC guideline and risk assessment tool. The implementation of an evidence-based risk assessment tool during primary care visits will improve the identification of patients who should be referred for CRC screening. <b>Methods:</b> For this quality improvement project, 25 patients were selected at random during their well-visit encounter, between the ages of 45 and 50, male or female, who did not have a current diagnosis or history of CRC. Over a 2-week period, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline and the evidence-based risk assessment tool were implemented during these patient encounters. Following implementation, there was a vigorous chart review to further determine which of those individuals were at risk for CRC based on the risk assessment tool. If the evidence identified a patient at risk for CRC, a colonoscopy was ordered. <b>Results:</b> The following week after implementation, a chart review was performed on all 25 of these individuals, which further identified who was at risk for CRC. The female patient accounted for only 4% of the total charts reviewed, whereas the remaining 24 male patients were calculated at 96% of the total. The only female patient indeed had CRC risk factors based on the risk assessment tool; in turn, a colonoscopy was ordered. For the remaining 24 male patients, it was identified that 7 of these individuals had CRC risk factors based on the risk assessment tool, and the remaining 17 did not. It was further identified that three out of the seven male patients, or 42.86%, were overdue for a colonoscopy. <b>Conclusion:</b> This means that approximately 29.167% of the male patients were identified as having CRC risk factors, and 70.833% were not. After patient discussion, a colonoscopy was ordered for all seven male individuals. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> In relation to these project findings, it is imperative that the nursing community continues to have leaders who will educate and promote the health and well-being of patients. As nurses continue to provide effective patient education, this will positively impact the overall patient health care delivery. By using risk assessment tools, such as the tool used for this project, nurses have the ability to prevent cancers and other disease states.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2024-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the years, colorectal cancer (CRC) has been diagnosed in younger adults less than 50 years of age, most common in those with Lynch syndrome. In turn, CRC has become the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths. According to Sinicrope et al. it is imperative in identifying inherited syndromes, Lynch syndrome being the most recurrent. Objective: This quality improvement project aimed to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care patients by implementing a CDC guideline and risk assessment tool. The implementation of an evidence-based risk assessment tool during primary care visits will improve the identification of patients who should be referred for CRC screening. Methods: For this quality improvement project, 25 patients were selected at random during their well-visit encounter, between the ages of 45 and 50, male or female, who did not have a current diagnosis or history of CRC. Over a 2-week period, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline and the evidence-based risk assessment tool were implemented during these patient encounters. Following implementation, there was a vigorous chart review to further determine which of those individuals were at risk for CRC based on the risk assessment tool. If the evidence identified a patient at risk for CRC, a colonoscopy was ordered. Results: The following week after implementation, a chart review was performed on all 25 of these individuals, which further identified who was at risk for CRC. The female patient accounted for only 4% of the total charts reviewed, whereas the remaining 24 male patients were calculated at 96% of the total. The only female patient indeed had CRC risk factors based on the risk assessment tool; in turn, a colonoscopy was ordered. For the remaining 24 male patients, it was identified that 7 of these individuals had CRC risk factors based on the risk assessment tool, and the remaining 17 did not. It was further identified that three out of the seven male patients, or 42.86%, were overdue for a colonoscopy. Conclusion: This means that approximately 29.167% of the male patients were identified as having CRC risk factors, and 70.833% were not. After patient discussion, a colonoscopy was ordered for all seven male individuals. Implications for Nursing: In relation to these project findings, it is imperative that the nursing community continues to have leaders who will educate and promote the health and well-being of patients. As nurses continue to provide effective patient education, this will positively impact the overall patient health care delivery. By using risk assessment tools, such as the tool used for this project, nurses have the ability to prevent cancers and other disease states.

使用循证风险评估工具在初级保健患者中增加结直肠癌筛查的CDC指南的实施
背景:多年来,结直肠癌(CRC)被诊断为年龄小于50岁的年轻人,最常见于Lynch综合征患者。反过来,结直肠癌已经成为癌症死亡的第四大原因。根据Sinicrope等人的研究,确定遗传性综合征是必要的,Lynch综合征是最常见的。目的:本质量改进项目旨在通过实施CDC指南和风险评估工具提高初级保健患者的结直肠癌筛查。在初级保健就诊期间实施基于证据的风险评估工具将改善对应转诊进行结直肠癌筛查的患者的识别。方法:在这个质量改善项目中,随机选择25例患者,年龄在45至50岁之间,男性或女性,目前没有CRC的诊断或病史。在两周的时间内,在这些患者接触期间实施了疾病控制和预防中心指南和循证风险评估工具。实施后,根据风险评估工具进行了有力的图表审查,以进一步确定哪些人有患CRC的风险。如果有证据表明患者有患结直肠癌的风险,则要求进行结肠镜检查。结果:实施后一周,对所有25名患者进行了图表审查,进一步确定了谁有患CRC的风险。女性患者仅占所审查的总图表的4%,而其余24名男性患者占总数的96%。根据风险评估工具,唯一的女性患者确实存在结直肠癌危险因素;接着,医生给她做了结肠镜检查。对于其余24例男性患者,根据风险评估工具确定其中7例具有CRC危险因素,其余17例没有。进一步确定,7名男性患者中有3名(42.86%)逾期未做结肠镜检查。结论:约29.167%的男性患者存在结直肠癌危险因素,70.833%的男性患者不存在结直肠癌危险因素。在患者讨论后,对所有7名男性患者进行了结肠镜检查。对护理的启示:与这些项目发现有关,护理界必须继续拥有能够教育和促进患者健康和福祉的领导者。随着护士继续提供有效的患者教育,这将对整体患者医疗保健服务产生积极影响。通过使用风险评估工具,例如本项目使用的工具,护士有能力预防癌症和其他疾病状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书