Does Exsanguination Enhance Skin Microcirculation in Remote Ischemic Conditioning Using a Tourniquet? A Randomized Controlled Trial on 50 Healthy Subjects.

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS Pub Date : 2026-03-27 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2779-2935
Carola Rist, Jens Rothenberger, Adrien Daigeler, Andrea Wenger
{"title":"Does Exsanguination Enhance Skin Microcirculation in Remote Ischemic Conditioning Using a Tourniquet? A Randomized Controlled Trial on 50 Healthy Subjects.","authors":"Carola Rist, Jens Rothenberger, Adrien Daigeler, Andrea Wenger","doi":"10.1055/a-2779-2935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) improves cutaneous microcirculation in free flap surgery. As no universal RIC protocol exists, refinements have mainly focused on cycle duration and number. We aimed to assess whether ischemic stimulus intensity, using a tourniquet with additional exsanguination, affects cutaneous microcirculation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 50 healthy volunteers were randomized into two groups (25 each). Both underwent an RIC protocol of three cycles of 10-minute ischemia followed by 10-minute reperfusion. In the control group (Tourniquet, T), ischemia was induced with a surgical tourniquet inflated to 250 mm Hg on the right upper arm. In the experimental group (Tourniquet with exsanguination, T <sup>e</sup> ), the arm was additionally exsanguinated using an Esmarch bandage. Cutaneous microcirculation parameters (oxygen saturation [SO <sub>2</sub> ], blood flow [BF], and relative amount of hemoglobin [rHb]) were assessed non-invasively with the oxygen to see (O2C) device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant changes in all microcirculatory parameters compared with baseline. Although SO <sub>2</sub> and BF values tended to be higher during reperfusion in the experimental group (T <sup>e</sup> ), overall differences were not statistically significant (except at the end of the first reperfusion phase in BF [T <sub>mean</sub> 1.33 ± 0.54 vs. T <sup>e</sup> <sub>mean</sub> 1.93 ± 0.91; <i>p</i>  = 0.017] and at the beginning of the second reperfusion phase in SO <sub>2</sub> [T <sub>mean</sub> 1.05 ± 0.18 vs. T <sup>e</sup> <sub>mean</sub> 1.13 ± 0.17; <i>p</i>  = 0.045], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exsanguination, in addition to tourniquet application, does not enhance cutaneous microcirculation in RIC protocols. The relatively small sample size remains a limitation and restricts generalizability. Future studies should confirm these findings in larger and more diverse cohorts and explore potential clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","volume":"53 2","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2779-2935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) improves cutaneous microcirculation in free flap surgery. As no universal RIC protocol exists, refinements have mainly focused on cycle duration and number. We aimed to assess whether ischemic stimulus intensity, using a tourniquet with additional exsanguination, affects cutaneous microcirculation.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 50 healthy volunteers were randomized into two groups (25 each). Both underwent an RIC protocol of three cycles of 10-minute ischemia followed by 10-minute reperfusion. In the control group (Tourniquet, T), ischemia was induced with a surgical tourniquet inflated to 250 mm Hg on the right upper arm. In the experimental group (Tourniquet with exsanguination, T e ), the arm was additionally exsanguinated using an Esmarch bandage. Cutaneous microcirculation parameters (oxygen saturation [SO 2 ], blood flow [BF], and relative amount of hemoglobin [rHb]) were assessed non-invasively with the oxygen to see (O2C) device.

Results: Both groups showed significant changes in all microcirculatory parameters compared with baseline. Although SO 2 and BF values tended to be higher during reperfusion in the experimental group (T e ), overall differences were not statistically significant (except at the end of the first reperfusion phase in BF [T mean 1.33 ± 0.54 vs. T e mean 1.93 ± 0.91; p  = 0.017] and at the beginning of the second reperfusion phase in SO 2 [T mean 1.05 ± 0.18 vs. T e mean 1.13 ± 0.17; p  = 0.045], respectively).

Conclusion: Exsanguination, in addition to tourniquet application, does not enhance cutaneous microcirculation in RIC protocols. The relatively small sample size remains a limitation and restricts generalizability. Future studies should confirm these findings in larger and more diverse cohorts and explore potential clinical applications.

止血能促进远端缺血条件下皮肤微循环吗?50名健康受试者的随机对照试验
背景:远程缺血调节(RIC)可改善游离皮瓣手术中皮肤微循环。由于没有通用的RIC协议存在,改进主要集中在周期持续时间和数量上。我们的目的是评估是否缺血性刺激强度,使用止血带额外放血,影响皮肤微循环。方法:将50名健康志愿者随机分为两组,每组25人。两例患者均接受了3个周期10分钟缺血后10分钟再灌注的RIC方案。在对照组(止血带,T)中,在右上臂用膨胀至250 mm Hg的外科止血带诱导缺血。实验组(止血带加放血,T),另用Esmarch绷带放血。皮肤微循环参数(血氧饱和度[so2]、血流量[BF]和血红蛋白相对量[rHb])采用氧见(O2C)装置无创评估。结果:与基线相比,两组微循环指标均有显著变化。虽然实验组在再灌注过程中so2和BF值有升高的趋势(T e),但总体差异无统计学意义(除了第一次再灌注期结束时BF值[T均值1.33±0.54 vs. T均值1.93±0.91;p = 0.017]和第二次再灌注期开始时so2值[T均值1.05±0.18 vs. T均值1.13±0.17;p = 0.045])。结论:在RIC方案中,除止血带外放血并不能增强皮肤微循环。相对较小的样本量仍然是一个限制,并限制了普遍性。未来的研究应该在更大、更多样化的人群中证实这些发现,并探索潜在的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书