{"title":"Challenging choice: a media study of anti-abortion movements in India.","authors":"Ragini Bordoloi, Vinitha Jayaprakasan, Souvik Pyne, Alka Barua","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2026.2653891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the backlash against abortion and reproductive autonomy has grown, driven by authoritarian regimes and conservative ideologies. In 2023, CommonHealth conducted a study to identify key anti-choice entities in India, examine their global links, and analyse their narratives and strategies for shaping public opinion and influencing policy through media platforms (print and social) in three languages. Key findings were that these organisations are leveraging educational platforms and social media, co-opting campaigns against gender-based discrimination, and framing their arguments with moral and constitutional rhetoric. Their tactics include the manipulation of public perception and gaining trust by blending science, religion, and emotional appeals. Crisis helplines, educational outreach, social media campaigns, mass mobilisation efforts, and direct peer interactions are utilised to particularly influence youth and garner support against reproductive choice. The study also highlights the growing influence of international networks on these initiatives. The emerging narratives are increasingly focused on intertwining anti-abortion and broader anti-choice ideologies, emphasising fetal rights and the sanctity of life. These initiatives thus pose a significant threat to reproductive rights and autonomy by undermining access to safe and legal abortion services. To counter this evolving anti-abortion activism, it is crucial to develop context-specific interventions and strategies. This analysis aims to contribute to a nuanced understanding of the challenges, calling for interdisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders to safeguard and strengthen reproductive justice. Reconceiving abortion as a life-enhancing decision is therefore essential to advancing reproductive rights and autonomy amidst escalating anti-choice narratives.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2653891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13173564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2026.2653891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, the backlash against abortion and reproductive autonomy has grown, driven by authoritarian regimes and conservative ideologies. In 2023, CommonHealth conducted a study to identify key anti-choice entities in India, examine their global links, and analyse their narratives and strategies for shaping public opinion and influencing policy through media platforms (print and social) in three languages. Key findings were that these organisations are leveraging educational platforms and social media, co-opting campaigns against gender-based discrimination, and framing their arguments with moral and constitutional rhetoric. Their tactics include the manipulation of public perception and gaining trust by blending science, religion, and emotional appeals. Crisis helplines, educational outreach, social media campaigns, mass mobilisation efforts, and direct peer interactions are utilised to particularly influence youth and garner support against reproductive choice. The study also highlights the growing influence of international networks on these initiatives. The emerging narratives are increasingly focused on intertwining anti-abortion and broader anti-choice ideologies, emphasising fetal rights and the sanctity of life. These initiatives thus pose a significant threat to reproductive rights and autonomy by undermining access to safe and legal abortion services. To counter this evolving anti-abortion activism, it is crucial to develop context-specific interventions and strategies. This analysis aims to contribute to a nuanced understanding of the challenges, calling for interdisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders to safeguard and strengthen reproductive justice. Reconceiving abortion as a life-enhancing decision is therefore essential to advancing reproductive rights and autonomy amidst escalating anti-choice narratives.
期刊介绍:
SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.