Do medical professional identities and identification predict organisational performance? Comparing senior psychiatrists in two mental health trusts.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Graeme Martin, Harry Staines, Christian Hosker
{"title":"Do medical professional identities and identification predict organisational performance? Comparing senior psychiatrists in two mental health trusts.","authors":"Graeme Martin, Harry Staines, Christian Hosker","doi":"10.1136/leader-2025-001481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical engagement is critical to high-performing organisational cultures in healthcare. However, the current literature on medical engagement is under-theorised and fails to take into account the role and impact of medical professional identities and identification in explaining organisational culture and performance in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We provide and test an alternative theoretical explanation of medical engagement as professional identity and identification problems, rooted in doctors' responses to changing configurations of institutional logics in healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, exploratory survey study comparing two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts with contrasting Care Quality Commission (CQC) ratings. Senior psychiatrists (n=119) employed at both trusts; 61 (Trust A) and 58 (Trust B) completed the survey (response rate: ~50% in both). Doctors' perceptions of institutional logics, medical professionalism, senior leadership and organisational identification were assessed using a questionnaire previously validated across senior doctors in all specialties in the UK. Organisational identification scores were compared across trusts, and predictors identified using multiple regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychiatrists in the CQC higher-rated trust reported significantly greater acceptance of hybrid (managerial, financial and political) logics in decision-making, higher confidence in medical and managerial leaders and stronger organisational identification (each p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis (<i>R²</i>= 0.662) indicated doctors' identification with their trusts was independently associated with positive views on leadership quality, a balance between clinical and managerial priorities and willingness to integrate evolving definitions of medical professionalism into their identities. Importantly, psychiatrists in the higher-rated trust were also more likely to recommend their employer as a good place to build a medical career (p<0.01), which is a strong indicator of behavioural identification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical professional identities and identification with their organisations enable high-performing mental health trusts by encouraging senior psychiatrists to integrate hybrid institutional logics and leadership roles into their professional identities. Leadership quality and organisational culture are also key mechanisms linking identification and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2025-001481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical engagement is critical to high-performing organisational cultures in healthcare. However, the current literature on medical engagement is under-theorised and fails to take into account the role and impact of medical professional identities and identification in explaining organisational culture and performance in healthcare.

Aim: We provide and test an alternative theoretical explanation of medical engagement as professional identity and identification problems, rooted in doctors' responses to changing configurations of institutional logics in healthcare.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, exploratory survey study comparing two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts with contrasting Care Quality Commission (CQC) ratings. Senior psychiatrists (n=119) employed at both trusts; 61 (Trust A) and 58 (Trust B) completed the survey (response rate: ~50% in both). Doctors' perceptions of institutional logics, medical professionalism, senior leadership and organisational identification were assessed using a questionnaire previously validated across senior doctors in all specialties in the UK. Organisational identification scores were compared across trusts, and predictors identified using multiple regression.

Results: Psychiatrists in the CQC higher-rated trust reported significantly greater acceptance of hybrid (managerial, financial and political) logics in decision-making, higher confidence in medical and managerial leaders and stronger organisational identification (each p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis (= 0.662) indicated doctors' identification with their trusts was independently associated with positive views on leadership quality, a balance between clinical and managerial priorities and willingness to integrate evolving definitions of medical professionalism into their identities. Importantly, psychiatrists in the higher-rated trust were also more likely to recommend their employer as a good place to build a medical career (p<0.01), which is a strong indicator of behavioural identification.

Conclusions: Medical professional identities and identification with their organisations enable high-performing mental health trusts by encouraging senior psychiatrists to integrate hybrid institutional logics and leadership roles into their professional identities. Leadership quality and organisational culture are also key mechanisms linking identification and performance.

医学专业身份和鉴定能预测组织绩效吗?比较两家精神卫生信托机构的高级精神科医生。
背景:医疗参与是关键的高绩效组织文化在医疗保健。然而,目前关于医疗敬业度的文献理论不足,未能考虑到医疗专业身份和身份在解释医疗保健组织文化和绩效方面的作用和影响。目的:我们提供并检验了医疗敬业作为职业认同和认同问题的另一种理论解释,其根源在于医生对医疗保健制度逻辑结构变化的反应。方法:我们进行了一项横断面的探索性调查研究,比较了两个英国国家卫生服务(NHS)的精神卫生信托和不同的护理质量委员会(CQC)评级。两家信托机构均聘用了资深精神科医生(n=119);61家(信托A)和58家(信托B)完成了调查(两者的回复率约为50%)。医生对机构逻辑、医疗专业精神、高层领导和组织认同的看法是通过之前在英国所有专业的高级医生中验证的问卷来评估的。组织识别分数进行了跨信托比较,并使用多元回归确定了预测因子。结果:在CQC高评级的信任中,精神科医生对决策的混合(管理、财务和政治)逻辑的接受程度显著更高,对医疗和管理领导者的信心更高,组织认同更强(各pR²= 0.662),表明医生对其信任的认同与对领导质量的积极看法独立相关。在临床和管理优先事项之间取得平衡,并愿意将不断发展的医学专业定义融入他们的身份。重要的是,在高评级信任中的精神科医生也更有可能推荐他们的雇主作为建立医疗事业的好地方(结论:医学专业身份和对其组织的认同,通过鼓励高级精神科医生将混合制度逻辑和领导角色整合到他们的职业身份中,从而使精神健康信托获得高绩效。领导素质和组织文化也是联系认同和绩效的关键机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书