Postoperative Progression of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Narrative Review Comparing Posterior Decompression with Fixation and Posterior Decompression Alone.

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-11-05 eCollection Date: 2026-03-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2025-0243
Takashi Hirai, Hiroshi Takahashi, Narihito Nagoshi, Kanji Mori, Kanichiro Wada, Satoshi Maki, Yasushi Oshima, Go Yoshida, Shiro Imagama, Masahiko Takahata, Hirotaka Chikuda, Masahiro Yoshida, Masao Koda, Motoki Iwasaki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Masashi Yamazaki, Toshitaka Yoshii
{"title":"Postoperative Progression of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Narrative Review Comparing Posterior Decompression with Fixation and Posterior Decompression Alone.","authors":"Takashi Hirai, Hiroshi Takahashi, Narihito Nagoshi, Kanji Mori, Kanichiro Wada, Satoshi Maki, Yasushi Oshima, Go Yoshida, Shiro Imagama, Masahiko Takahata, Hirotaka Chikuda, Masahiro Yoshida, Masao Koda, Motoki Iwasaki, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Masashi Yamazaki, Toshitaka Yoshii","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This narrative review compares decompression alone and decompression with fixation in the surgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in terms of postoperative progression of ossification. Using published studies, we analyzed ossification size changes at the surgical site and adjacent segments. The results suggest that fixation not only stabilizes the spine but may also suppress the progression of ossification, although neurological outcomes were comparable between decompression with fixation and decompression alone. However, the enlargement of ossification observed at the segments adjacent to the operated levels is occasionally greater in cases treated with decompression with fixation than in those treated with decompression alone. These results may be important in determining the optimal surgical strategy based on OPLL morphology and spinal alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"174-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This narrative review compares decompression alone and decompression with fixation in the surgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in terms of postoperative progression of ossification. Using published studies, we analyzed ossification size changes at the surgical site and adjacent segments. The results suggest that fixation not only stabilizes the spine but may also suppress the progression of ossification, although neurological outcomes were comparable between decompression with fixation and decompression alone. However, the enlargement of ossification observed at the segments adjacent to the operated levels is occasionally greater in cases treated with decompression with fixation than in those treated with decompression alone. These results may be important in determining the optimal surgical strategy based on OPLL morphology and spinal alignment.

颈椎后纵韧带骨化的术后进展:后路减压与单纯内固定及后路减压的比较。
这篇叙述性的综述比较了单纯减压和减压加固定在手术治疗颈后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)中的骨化术后进展情况。利用已发表的研究,我们分析了手术部位和邻近节段骨化大小的变化。结果表明,固定不仅可以稳定脊柱,还可以抑制骨化的进展,尽管减压联合固定和单独减压的神经学结果相当。然而,与单纯减压治疗相比,在减压固定治疗的病例中,在手术节段附近观察到的骨化扩大有时更大。这些结果可能是重要的,以确定最佳的手术策略为基础的OPLL形态和脊柱对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书