Enhanced Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Calcium Phosphate Cement: Development of a Novel Augmentation Technique for Percutaneous Insertion.

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-12-10 eCollection Date: 2026-03-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2025-0283
Daisuke Inoue, Takayuki Fujiyoshi, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Haruo Kanno
{"title":"Enhanced Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Calcium Phosphate Cement: Development of a Novel Augmentation Technique for Percutaneous Insertion.","authors":"Daisuke Inoue, Takayuki Fujiyoshi, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Haruo Kanno","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures using implants often results in implant failure owing to poor bone quality. We developed a new augmentation technique using calcium phosphate cement (CPC) for percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs). This study evaluated the reinforcement effect of CPC on the initial fixation strength of PPSs in synthetic bone specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the X-Needle<sup>Ⓡ</sup>, developed for screw hole preparation and CPC injection, a 40 mm deep pilot hole was created in 40×40×60 mm bone specimens. A commercially available CPC (BIOPEX-R<sup>Ⓡ</sup>) was mixed at a powder-to-liquid ratio of 12 g/3.4 mL, and 0.5 mL was injected into the pilot hole 6 minutes (min) after mixing. Screws were then inserted using the standard PPS technique. Pull-out strength (N) was measured seven times in four groups: without CPC (control group), immediately after CPC injection (CPC0 group), 10 mins after CPC injection (CPC10 group), and 24 hours after CPC injection (CPC24 group). Toggle tests were conducted six times in the control and CPC24 groups to measure the number of cycles/load (N) required to achieve 2 mm screw head displacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pull-out test, the maximal pull-out strength in the CPC24 group was significantly greater than that in the control and CPC0 groups. Pull-out strength in the CPC10 and CPC24 groups increased to 121.1% and 165.1% of that of the control group, respectively. In the toggle test, the CPC24 group showed significantly higher values for both cycles and load compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The X-Needle<sup>Ⓡ</sup> enables simple, minimally invasive CPC injection into the pilot hole, facilitating PPS augmentation. Additionally, screws augmented with CPC showed increased pull-out and toggle strengths. PPS augmentation using CPC may serve as a preventive measure against implant failure in spinal surgery for patients with poor bone quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"296-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures using implants often results in implant failure owing to poor bone quality. We developed a new augmentation technique using calcium phosphate cement (CPC) for percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs). This study evaluated the reinforcement effect of CPC on the initial fixation strength of PPSs in synthetic bone specimens.

Methods: Using the X-NeedleⓇ, developed for screw hole preparation and CPC injection, a 40 mm deep pilot hole was created in 40×40×60 mm bone specimens. A commercially available CPC (BIOPEX-RⓇ) was mixed at a powder-to-liquid ratio of 12 g/3.4 mL, and 0.5 mL was injected into the pilot hole 6 minutes (min) after mixing. Screws were then inserted using the standard PPS technique. Pull-out strength (N) was measured seven times in four groups: without CPC (control group), immediately after CPC injection (CPC0 group), 10 mins after CPC injection (CPC10 group), and 24 hours after CPC injection (CPC24 group). Toggle tests were conducted six times in the control and CPC24 groups to measure the number of cycles/load (N) required to achieve 2 mm screw head displacement.

Results: In the pull-out test, the maximal pull-out strength in the CPC24 group was significantly greater than that in the control and CPC0 groups. Pull-out strength in the CPC10 and CPC24 groups increased to 121.1% and 165.1% of that of the control group, respectively. In the toggle test, the CPC24 group showed significantly higher values for both cycles and load compared to the control group.

Conclusions: The X-NeedleⓇ enables simple, minimally invasive CPC injection into the pilot hole, facilitating PPS augmentation. Additionally, screws augmented with CPC showed increased pull-out and toggle strengths. PPS augmentation using CPC may serve as a preventive measure against implant failure in spinal surgery for patients with poor bone quality.

磷酸钙水泥增强椎弓根螺钉的固定强度:一种新型经皮插入增强技术的发展。
导言:脊柱手术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折时,由于骨质量差,常常导致植入物失败。我们开发了一种新的经皮椎弓根螺钉增强技术,使用磷酸钙水泥(CPC)。本研究评估了CPC对合成骨标本中PPSs初始固定强度的增强作用。方法:使用用于螺钉孔制备和CPC注射的x针Ⓡ,在40×40×60 mm骨标本上形成40 mm深的导孔。将市售CPC (BIOPEX-RⓇ)以粉液比12 g/3.4 mL混合,混合后6分钟(min)将0.5 mL注入先导孔。然后使用标准PPS技术插入螺钉。在未注射CPC(对照组)、注射CPC后立即(CPC0组)、注射CPC后10分钟(CPC10组)、注射CPC后24小时(CPC24组)四组中测量7次拔出力(N)。在对照组和CPC24组中进行了6次切换试验,以测量达到2mm螺钉头位移所需的循环次数/负载(N)。结果:在拔牙试验中,CPC24组最大拔牙强度显著大于对照组和CPC0组。CPC10组和CPC24组的拔拔强度分别提高到对照组的121.1%和165.1%。在切换测试中,与对照组相比,CPC24组在循环和负荷方面都显示出显着更高的值。结论:X-NeedleⓇ能够在先导孔内进行简单、微创的CPC注射,促进PPS增强。此外,添加CPC的螺丝显示出更高的拉出和拨动强度。使用CPC进行PPS增强可以预防脊柱手术中骨质量差的患者植入物失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书