Fulcrum Side-Bending Radiographs as Predictors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

IF 1.6 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2026-03-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2025-0226
Tetsutaro Abe, Masashi Miyazaki, Noriaki Sako, Nobuhiro Kaku
{"title":"Fulcrum Side-Bending Radiographs as Predictors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.","authors":"Tetsutaro Abe, Masashi Miyazaki, Noriaki Sako, Nobuhiro Kaku","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2025-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) is a cosmetically and psychologically significant complication following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). While commonly studied in thoracic curve patterns, its occurrence in Lenke type 5 curves remains under-investigated. This study aimed to identify radiographic predictors of PSI in Lenke type 5 AIS, with particular emphasis on preoperative fulcrum side bending (FSB) flexibility assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 21 patients with Lenke type 5C AIS (mean age 14.6±2.6 years) who underwent posterior spinal fusion using all-pedicle screw constructs. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were analyzed, including Cobb angles of proximal thoracic, main thoracic (MT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL) curves. Flexibility was assessed with active side bending (ASB) and FSB radiographs. ΔASB and ΔFSB were calculated as the difference from the standing Cobb angles. PSI was defined as a coracoid height difference ≥9 mm or a clavicle angle ≥2°.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSI occurred in 7 patients (33.3%). The PSI group showed significantly greater ΔFSB in the TL curve (41.7°±5.7 vs. 35.3°±2.2, p=0.01), smaller ΔFSB in the MT curve (p=0.04), and a higher TL correction rate (p=0.03). Logistic regression identified ΔFSB in TL (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, p=0.03) and TL correction rate (OR 1.15, p=0.04) as independent predictors of PSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative FSB radiographs are valuable not only for estimating curve flexibility but also for identifying patients at risk of PSI in Lenke type 5 AIS. Surgeons should consider not only the absolute flexibility of each curve but also the relative flexibility between TL and MT segments when determining correction magnitude; intraoperative moderation of TL correction may be warranted when the MT segment demonstrates limited compensatory flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"244-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2025-0226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) is a cosmetically and psychologically significant complication following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). While commonly studied in thoracic curve patterns, its occurrence in Lenke type 5 curves remains under-investigated. This study aimed to identify radiographic predictors of PSI in Lenke type 5 AIS, with particular emphasis on preoperative fulcrum side bending (FSB) flexibility assessment.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 21 patients with Lenke type 5C AIS (mean age 14.6±2.6 years) who underwent posterior spinal fusion using all-pedicle screw constructs. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were analyzed, including Cobb angles of proximal thoracic, main thoracic (MT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL) curves. Flexibility was assessed with active side bending (ASB) and FSB radiographs. ΔASB and ΔFSB were calculated as the difference from the standing Cobb angles. PSI was defined as a coracoid height difference ≥9 mm or a clavicle angle ≥2°.

Results: PSI occurred in 7 patients (33.3%). The PSI group showed significantly greater ΔFSB in the TL curve (41.7°±5.7 vs. 35.3°±2.2, p=0.01), smaller ΔFSB in the MT curve (p=0.04), and a higher TL correction rate (p=0.03). Logistic regression identified ΔFSB in TL (odds ratio [OR] 1.21, p=0.03) and TL correction rate (OR 1.15, p=0.04) as independent predictors of PSI.

Conclusions: Preoperative FSB radiographs are valuable not only for estimating curve flexibility but also for identifying patients at risk of PSI in Lenke type 5 AIS. Surgeons should consider not only the absolute flexibility of each curve but also the relative flexibility between TL and MT segments when determining correction magnitude; intraoperative moderation of TL correction may be warranted when the MT segment demonstrates limited compensatory flexibility.

支点侧弯x线片作为Lenke 5型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后肩部不平衡的预测指标。
摘要:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)手术矫正后,术后肩部失衡(PSI)是一种美容和心理上显著的并发症。虽然通常在胸部弯曲模式中研究,但在Lenke 5型弯曲中发生的情况仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在确定Lenke 5型AIS中PSI的影像学预测因素,特别强调术前支点侧弯(FSB)柔韧性评估。方法:对21例Lenke 5C型AIS患者(平均年龄14.6±2.6岁)行全椎弓根螺钉后路融合术进行回顾性分析。分析术前和术后影像学参数,包括近段胸椎、主胸椎(MT)和胸腰椎(TL)曲线的Cobb角。通过主动侧弯(ASB)和FSB x线片评估柔韧性。ΔASB和ΔFSB作为与站立Cobb角的差值计算。PSI定义为喙突高度差≥9 mm或锁骨角≥2°。结果:7例患者发生PSI,占33.3%。PSI组TL曲线ΔFSB(41.7°±5.7比35.3°±2.2,p=0.01)、MT曲线ΔFSB (p=0.04)、TL矫正率(p=0.03)均显著增高。Logistic回归发现ΔFSB在TL(比值比[OR] 1.21, p=0.03)和TL校正率(OR 1.15, p=0.04)是PSI的独立预测因子。结论:术前FSB x线片不仅对估计Lenke 5型AIS的曲线柔韧性有价值,而且对识别有PSI风险的患者也有价值。在确定矫正幅度时,外科医生不仅要考虑每条曲线的绝对柔韧性,还要考虑左、右节段之间的相对柔韧性;当MT节段代偿灵活性有限时,术中适度矫正TL是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书