Individualized decitabine dosing for post-HSCT maintenance in MDS and secondary AML from MDS: long-term outcomes from the PODAC trial and matched controls.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2026-04-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406207261432568
Silvia Park, Suein Choi, Seunghoon Han, Yoo-Jin Kim
{"title":"Individualized decitabine dosing for post-HSCT maintenance in MDS and secondary AML from MDS: long-term outcomes from the PODAC trial and matched controls.","authors":"Silvia Park, Suein Choi, Seunghoon Han, Yoo-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1177/20406207261432568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a major clinical challenge in higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Although hypomethylating agents have been evaluated as posttransplant maintenance therapy, their efficacy remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of individualized decitabine maintenance therapy following HSCT in patients with MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective comparative study based on a long-term follow-up of the phase I PODAC trial, which individualized posttransplant decitabine maintenance dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen PODAC participants were included in the treatment group and compared with 52 matched control patients selected through target trial emulation using identical eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 19 PODAC participants, a median of 6 cycles was administered, starting at 5 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day and escalating to a median maintenance dose of 7 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day. After a median follow-up of 11.4 years in the PODAC group and 9.7 years in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.90), no significant differences were observed between the two groups in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival, or the incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and grades II-IV acute GVHD. However, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD was significantly lower in the PODAC group and decitabine maintenance emerged as an independent predictor for longer chronic GVHD-free relapse-free survival (cCRFS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decitabine maintenance using an adaptive dosing approach enabled prolonged treatment and was associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD and improved cGRFS. However, it did not improve survival or relapse outcomes compared to the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"17 ","pages":"20406207261432568"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207261432568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a major clinical challenge in higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Although hypomethylating agents have been evaluated as posttransplant maintenance therapy, their efficacy remains uncertain.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of individualized decitabine maintenance therapy following HSCT in patients with MDS or secondary acute myeloid leukemia from MDS.

Design: This was a retrospective comparative study based on a long-term follow-up of the phase I PODAC trial, which individualized posttransplant decitabine maintenance dosing.

Methods: Nineteen PODAC participants were included in the treatment group and compared with 52 matched control patients selected through target trial emulation using identical eligibility criteria.

Results: For the 19 PODAC participants, a median of 6 cycles was administered, starting at 5 mg/m2/day and escalating to a median maintenance dose of 7 mg/m2/day. After a median follow-up of 11.4 years in the PODAC group and 9.7 years in the control group (p = 0.90), no significant differences were observed between the two groups in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival, or the incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and grades II-IV acute GVHD. However, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD was significantly lower in the PODAC group and decitabine maintenance emerged as an independent predictor for longer chronic GVHD-free relapse-free survival (cCRFS).

Conclusion: Decitabine maintenance using an adaptive dosing approach enabled prolonged treatment and was associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD and improved cGRFS. However, it did not improve survival or relapse outcomes compared to the control group.

个体化地西他滨剂量用于MDS和MDS继发性AML的hsct后维持:来自PODAC试验和匹配对照的长期结果
背景:同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后复发仍然是高风险骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDS)的主要临床挑战。虽然低甲基化药物已被评估为移植后维持治疗,但其疗效仍不确定。目的:我们旨在评估MDS或MDS继发性急性髓系白血病患者HSCT后个体化地西他滨维持治疗的长期临床结果。设计:这是一项基于I期PODAC试验长期随访的回顾性比较研究,该试验个体化移植后地西他滨维持剂量。方法:将19名PODAC患者纳入治疗组,并与52名匹配的对照患者进行比较,通过目标试验模拟,采用相同的资格标准。结果:对于19名PODAC参与者,中位给予6个周期,从5mg /m2/天开始,逐渐增加到7mg /m2/天的中位维持剂量。PODAC组中位随访11.4年,对照组中位随访9.7年(p = 0.90),两组在总生存期、无复发生存期、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)无复发生存期、复发发生率、非复发死亡率和II-IV级急性GVHD方面无显著差异。然而,PODAC组中重度慢性GVHD的发生率显著降低,地西他滨维持成为更长的慢性GVHD无复发生存期(cCRFS)的独立预测因子。结论:采用自适应给药方法维持地西他滨能够延长治疗时间,并与慢性GVHD发病率降低和cGRFS改善相关。然而,与对照组相比,它并没有改善生存或复发结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书