Optimizing perioperative care in esophagectomy: a narrative review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2026-03-31 Epub Date: 2026-03-16 DOI:10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2175
Tessa C M Geraedts, Misha D P Luyer
{"title":"Optimizing perioperative care in esophagectomy: a narrative review.","authors":"Tessa C M Geraedts, Misha D P Luyer","doi":"10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Perioperative management of esophageal cancer surgery is continuously evolving. Advances in patient preparation, surgical techniques, and the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have collectively improved postoperative outcomes and recovery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been widely adopted due to its association with reduced surgical trauma, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and, in some studies, lower complication rates. Despite these advances, esophagectomy remains a high-risk procedure with substantial morbidity, underscoring the need for continued optimization of perioperative care. This review focuses on recent developments in perioperative care and their impact on outcomes in esophageal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review provides an overview of the literature on perioperative optimization in esophageal cancer surgery, with emphasis on developments from the past several years, and is structured around key domains including prehabilitation, surgical techniques, ERAS protocols, and emerging experimental strategies.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Structured prehabilitation programs combining physical training, psychological support, and nutritional optimization have demonstrated complementary benefits in enhancing functional reserve and surgical tolerance. Current clinical practice increasingly focuses on technical refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy, with growing adoption of robot-assisted techniques to enhance surgical precision and postoperative outcomes. Within ERAS, postoperative nutritional management is one of the least consistently implemented components, although direct oral feeding after minimally invasive esophagectomy has been shown to be safe and feasible and may enhance recovery and even long-term outcomes. In parallel with these advances, experimental strategies have been explored to further attenuate perioperative inflammation. Neuromodulation of the sympathetic nervous system has shown potential to modulate the postoperative immune response and holds promise for further improving postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perioperative care for esophagectomy has evolved towards a multimodal and patient-centered approach. Optimization of prehabilitation, minimally invasive (including robotic) techniques and ERAS-based perioperative care may further improve postoperative outcomes. Neuromodulation may represent a promising adjunct but requires further clinical validation. Continued refinement of perioperative pathways may contribute not only to faster recovery, but also to improved long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"18 3","pages":"251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2025-aw-2175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Perioperative management of esophageal cancer surgery is continuously evolving. Advances in patient preparation, surgical techniques, and the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have collectively improved postoperative outcomes and recovery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been widely adopted due to its association with reduced surgical trauma, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and, in some studies, lower complication rates. Despite these advances, esophagectomy remains a high-risk procedure with substantial morbidity, underscoring the need for continued optimization of perioperative care. This review focuses on recent developments in perioperative care and their impact on outcomes in esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods: This narrative review provides an overview of the literature on perioperative optimization in esophageal cancer surgery, with emphasis on developments from the past several years, and is structured around key domains including prehabilitation, surgical techniques, ERAS protocols, and emerging experimental strategies.

Key content and findings: Structured prehabilitation programs combining physical training, psychological support, and nutritional optimization have demonstrated complementary benefits in enhancing functional reserve and surgical tolerance. Current clinical practice increasingly focuses on technical refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy, with growing adoption of robot-assisted techniques to enhance surgical precision and postoperative outcomes. Within ERAS, postoperative nutritional management is one of the least consistently implemented components, although direct oral feeding after minimally invasive esophagectomy has been shown to be safe and feasible and may enhance recovery and even long-term outcomes. In parallel with these advances, experimental strategies have been explored to further attenuate perioperative inflammation. Neuromodulation of the sympathetic nervous system has shown potential to modulate the postoperative immune response and holds promise for further improving postoperative outcomes.

Conclusions: Perioperative care for esophagectomy has evolved towards a multimodal and patient-centered approach. Optimization of prehabilitation, minimally invasive (including robotic) techniques and ERAS-based perioperative care may further improve postoperative outcomes. Neuromodulation may represent a promising adjunct but requires further clinical validation. Continued refinement of perioperative pathways may contribute not only to faster recovery, but also to improved long-term outcomes.

食管切除术围手术期护理的优化:叙述性回顾。
背景与目的:食管癌手术围手术期管理不断发展。患者准备、手术技术的进步以及术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案的实施共同改善了术后结果和恢复。微创食管切除术因其手术创伤小、出血量少、住院时间短以及在一些研究中并发症发生率低而被广泛采用。尽管取得了这些进展,但食管切除术仍然是一种高风险的手术,发病率很高,因此需要继续优化围手术期护理。本文综述了食管癌手术围手术期护理的最新进展及其对预后的影响。方法:本文综述了食管癌手术围手术期优化的文献,重点介绍了过去几年的进展,并围绕康复、手术技术、ERAS协议和新兴实验策略等关键领域进行了综述。主要内容和发现:结合体能训练、心理支持和营养优化的结构化康复计划在增强功能储备和手术耐受性方面具有互补的优势。目前的临床实践越来越关注微创食管切除术的技术改进,越来越多地采用机器人辅助技术来提高手术精度和术后效果。在ERAS中,尽管微创食管切除术后直接口服喂养已被证明是安全可行的,并可能提高恢复甚至长期预后,但术后营养管理是最不一致实施的组成部分之一。与这些进展并行,实验策略已被探索进一步减轻围手术期炎症。交感神经系统的神经调节已显示出调节术后免疫反应的潜力,并有望进一步改善术后结果。结论:食管切除术围手术期护理已发展为多模式和以患者为中心的方法。优化康复、微创(包括机器人)技术和基于erass的围手术期护理可以进一步改善术后预后。神经调节可能是一种很有前途的辅助手段,但需要进一步的临床验证。持续完善围手术期路径不仅有助于更快的恢复,而且有助于改善长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书